This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Aristotle's Argument For People's Actions Essay

654 words - 3 pages

Aristotle's Argument for People's Actions

Aristotle argues things people do aims at some end or end. The highest end to all of these things is attaining happiness. I maintain that it is impossible for a human being to be happy according to Aristotle's definition due to the fact that he sets strict conditions of perfect virtue thus happiness.
Aristotle suggests that happiness is not a state, but rather we count happiness as an activity. He argues that happiness is an activity of the soul in accordance with perfect virtue. This cannot be true, because if one, at anytime, acts outside of perfect virtue than he has undermined the whole "activity." Aristotle argues that happiness is not found in amusement for it is too incongruous to end in amusement, and that our efforts and sufferings would be aimed at amusing ourselves. I argue that happiness can be found in amusement. When one is amusing himself he is said to be happy. But this does not agree with Aristotle's theory of perfect virtue. Aristotle contests that the happy life seems to be in accord with virtue, which involves serious actions, not amusing ones. Thereby Aristotle is saying that things taken seriously provide happiness as opposed to funny things that provide amusement not happiness. I maintain that one cannot act in continuous perfect virtue, consistently take things seriously, and engage in serious action. This would make for an impossible doing by a human being. For one cannot act in perfect virtue all the time. Does this mean he will never attain happiness?

Aristotle's definition of happiness is utilitarian. What Aristotle is arguing is theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible balance of pleasure over pain or the greatest happiness for the greatest number, the most virtuous. To become virtuous, one...

Find Another Essay On Aristotle's Argument for People's Actions

The Good Man Based on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

1504 words - 6 pages The Good Man Based on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Plato believed that a man could only become good by knowing the truth, and he could not know the truth without being good. This shows to be somewhat of a paradoxical argument. On the other hand, Aristotle had a different theory regarding the goodness of man. Aristotle claimed that the good man was the norm and the measure of ethical truth. Pertaining to Aristotle's definitions, in this

Aristotle and The Human Good This is an essay on Aristotles arguement that happiness is the highest end of human good. I argue against his points and give details why

1179 words - 5 pages even small children) can be considered happy because happiness is action in accordance with reason. Aristotle is contradicting himself in that he argues that what sets man apart from animal is reason and the ability to perform actions that only humans can perform. Yet, he is arguing that children to not have reason hence he is basically putting them at the level of animals and proving his own argument faulty.He does not leave room for error in his

Critically Examine Aristotle's Understanding of the Good and its Relationship to Human Function

1050 words - 4 pages someone's life due to good or bad fortunes.One criticism of this argument would be to ask, could it be that humans don't actually have a function? Aristotle seems to argue that animals cannot perform certain functions that humans can, such as thinking, or playing chess for example. However, you might see that acts such as thinking can be seen in some animals, and are not characteristically human according to Aristotle's definition, which would make

Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle:Morals and Ethical Codes

1160 words - 5 pages use reason that sets humans apart from the other animals. According to Aristotle, human virtue means virtue of the soul and not the body, just like human happiness means happiness of the soul.There is a point in Aristotle's argument that can be contradictory. Aristotle's search for "the good" is a search for the "highest good". He assumes that the highest good, whatever it turns out to be, has three characteristics- it is desirable for itself, it

Aristotle's Characteristics in the Crucible

2576 words - 10 pages acceptable, it does arouse people's feeling and emotions, they just keep wondering about the reason for this unpredictable change of fortune.Furthermore, "wicked men should not pass from misfortune to having good fortune" (Aristotle 100), and that is because poetic justice will not be preserved, as in tragic plays the bad or wicked character must be punished at the end. For his terrible actions to satisfy the audience that are waiting to see justice

Magnanimity

1757 words - 7 pages honors the magnanimous man claims for himself do not benefit himself alone, for those honors necessarily entail exertion on behalf of the political community. On the basis of Aristotle's argument in book 2 of the Nicomachean Ethics, one must conclude that the great-souled man does owe his virtue in large part to someone else. A magnanimous man's moral excellence, and hence his worthiness of great honors, can be said to be to a great extent the

Hamlet and Oedipus: A Comparison

2070 words - 8 pages is someone who is “amply capable of making choices – capable too of accepting the consequences” (“Aristotle's” 858). Oedipus at least meets this characteristic. It can be argued that Hamlet does as well. For Hamlet, the reversal is not initially brought about by his own actions. Rather, his actions are a response to the initial evil, though they carry dark consequences of their own. For example, his confounding treatment of Ophelia

Matthew Arnold versus Aristotle's Poetics

3851 words - 15 pages The value of imitation: a vision of Aristotle's Poetics Aristotle wrote his Poetics thousands of years before Matthew Arnold's birth. His reasons for composing it were different from Arnold's reasons for using it as an element of his own poetic criticism. We can safely say that Arnold was inclined to use the Poetics as an inspiration for his own poetry, and as a cultural weapon in the fight for artistic and social renewal. Aristotle, by

Science Background reseach paper

576 words - 2 pages when we learn new information about that topic. For example, how do we prove that all swans are white? An inductive argument could be that all of the swans I saw have all been white, but when I learn that there are swans in Australia which are black the fact changes.I have used Plato's thought while watching sports games and believed that my favorite team will always win. I have also used Aristotle's thought in many situations when I was younger

"Oedipus Rex", Aristotle's Tragic Hero

744 words - 3 pages understanding!" (725, Oedipus the King) Aristotle also states that the character's actions and persona should be appropriate to the character. He uses the example that it would may be possible for a character to be brave, but not towards a woman. "...for it is possible for a character to be brave, in inappropriately to a woman." (The Poetics) Showing the appropriate frigid dignity and intellect of a king, Oedipus meets another of Aristotle's

The Problems of Good & Evil

1300 words - 5 pages omniscient, he would have seen that our world was going to be screwed. However, he created it anyway.This argument leads into the third trait of a perfect God, which is omni benevolence, or "all good". If God is omni benevolent and omniscient, why would he create a world where people experience so much pain. It is obvious that pain is not a good thing for people. Wouldn't an omni benevolent God want to create a world where people only experience

Similar Essays

Evaluate Aristotle's Argument(S) For His Claim That Happiness (Eudaimonia) Is The Goal Of Human Life

1899 words - 8 pages Evaluate Aristotle's argument(s) for his claim that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life.In evaluating Aristotle's arguments for his claim that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life, I believe it is important to recognise the true problem at hand, which can be seen to be, does Aristotle succeed arguing that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life? I believe that overall Aristotle does not succeed in arguing this

Utilitarianism Vs. Aristotelian Ethics Essay

2465 words - 10 pages are based on observations of people's actions and behavior in daily life. The inconsistencies found in Aristotle's argument""his method for defining a good or bad character, as well as the allowances he makes for one and not the other""make accepting his moral system difficult for the utilitarian. Also difficult to accept is Aristotle's teleological view of a universal order and only one moral path to take, the existence of which is supposed to be

Aristotelian Versus Kantian Ethics Essay

1780 words - 7 pages ). Most importantly, the mean is personal. That is, it relates and changes according to each person. For example, the amount of food one eats depends on size and the activity of that person (Aristotle, 1106a20-1106b10). If the mean is personal and virtue is the mean, then would not happiness, which stems from virtue, be different from each person? Therefore, Aristotle's argument of happiness is morally ethical and consistent. Kant, on the other hand

The Motionless Arrow, Aristotle's Thoughts On Zeno's Arrow Paradox

917 words - 4 pages Aristotle's thoughts on Zeno's Arrow Argument as represented in Chapter 9 of Aristotle's Physics: A Guided Study can be understood in such a way that it might not be 'next door to madness'. In this chapter, Aristotle interprets Zeno's argument of the Flying Arrow as 'missing the mark'. There are four premises for this argument, and in Aristotle's opinion, premise three can be rejected. He does not believe that time is composed of indivisible