This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Aristotle Vs. Hobbes: Equality. Essay

2365 words - 9 pages

Aristotle vs. Hobbes, constitutes a debate between two great thinkers from two profoundly different periods of time. Whereas Aristotle (384 - 322 BCE) had been a part of the Greek's and more precisely, Athens's Golden Age, Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679) had lived through the English Civil War of 1640s to become one of the most influential philosophers. Based on their own personal experiences and surroundings, both Aristotle and Hobbes had developed a view of what human equality should sustain. However, Hobbes' understanding of natural equality is preferable, as he provides society with the extra room for equality and opportunity that the subjects of a good sovereign would experience to be available to them, in comparison to Aristotle's hierarchical division of people into natural superiors, inferiors and slaves, who are given very limited achievements and opportunities.Aristotle's idea of equality would have applied to all citizens who participate in the political life of the city-state in which they live. By doing so, they would have acquired the human virtues and excellences, as well as achieve their natural telos as a "political animal" (Aristotle, p. 4). Only within a city-state, citizens are able to participate and enhance their political and practical reason, thus reach their human telos. As such, the city-state is "among the things that exist by nature" (Aristotle, p. 4), and living in one is the only possible natural outcome for humans. However, the term citizen in Aristotle's perspective would not have applied to everyone, but it would have been rather limited within the city-state.The city-state had been formed as a household, a partnership between "persons who cannot exist without one another" (Aristotle, 1252a27) and had later developed into a community of households, villages, the telos of which results in a chain of villages, city-state. It had come into existence to sustain our basic needs and it had stayed in order to support a better way of life. The household is the main structure in the city-state, which in fact provides citizens with the opportunity to perfect their human virtues. Not only is the household a subordinate to the political institution, but also within itself it is entirely formed by unequal relationships - natural ruler vs. natural slave, husband vs. wife, parent vs. child, "The slave is wholly lacking the deliberative element; the female has it but it lacks authority; the child has it but it is incomplete" (1260a11). Women had not been allowed to vote during Aristotle's time and as such their natural telos would have been different from that of the men. Together with the natural slaves, they would have in different ways from one another, provided the men with the needed basic necessities to sustain life and thus have more time to achieve their telos as a "political animal" (Aristotle, p. 4). However, natural slaves would have had no rights in comparison to the women, since the idea of an enslaved person means that...

Find Another Essay On Aristotle vs. Hobbes: Equality.

The Foundations of Political Life Essay

1259 words - 5 pages there is no requirement that the regime will fall, but that the only way chaos will return is when man himself allows it to return, because man is ultimately in charge of his own destiny. Aristotle and Socrates believed that man has the ability to reason and this sets us apart from the beast. While both Hobbes and Vico would agree with this view, and they argue this as well, only Vico would agree with Plato on his ideas of the natural order

Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Machiavelli Essay

2342 words - 9 pages true. Man, n my opinion, is only interested in achieving his own success. What hurts him, he avoids; what helps him, he befriends. Hobbes, unlike Machiavelli, sees men as equal -- equal in the capability of killing one another. He reasoned that because of this equality people would eventually come to the conclusion that they could prevent their demise by behaving toward one another in mutually beneficial ways. This, Hobbes said, is why man

Thomas Hobbes

1627 words - 7 pages opinion that the power was divided between King, Lords, and Commons (Grimke & Howells, 1998). Although it seems that Hobbes speaks mostly of two forms of government, monarchy and aristocracy, he identifies the third form of government as a democracy. Unlike early philosophers like Socrates, Aristotle, and Plato; who believed that governments can be despotic - tyranny, oligarchy, and anarchy (Grimke & Howells, 1998). To Hobbes, these terms are

Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

1867 words - 7 pages war at the expense of a far superior sacrifice which is human life. The passion of glory has left a lot of blood in the streets for the vainglory of a heightened status in reputation. .Critics of Hobbes and his theory of "war of all against all" will point to it being an exaggeration of human nature. Critics who favor the teachings of Plato and Aristotle may argue that man is a social being naturally drawn together for the desire of community life

Thomas Hobbes' Social Contract Theory

1039 words - 4 pages . Humans are like scavengers wanting more and more power. By achieving such desire, we are securing the power to live well. To make sure to secure this power, we must be able to do something about it and allow the power to grow. Sometimes we might want to achieve the same desire. Hobbes input the hypothetical idea, “From this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends. And therefore, if any two men desire the same

The Good Ghanaian Society

1490 words - 6 pages further define how this good society would be established and it is at this point that all the great thinkers whose works are sandwiched in the library between Aristotle and Weber, defined it differently. To Aristotle, the Good Society permits some of its members to live the good life. To Hobbes, it provides sufficient order to allow material progress. To Locke, it guarantees life, liberty and prosperity. To Rousseau, it preserves as much as possible

Freedom Of Expression And Action In Libya After The Libyan Uprising

2049 words - 8 pages Libyan society should protect individual rights to free expression and action, especially given its current political situation. To do this, a brief discussion about Libyan uprising put forth by Thomas Hobbes and Polybius and the concept of freedom of expression and action from the perspectives of Aristotle and Cicero will be discussed. Even before, there have been a prolonged opposition to Gaddafi in the city of Benghazi. And this later

A Futuristic interview with Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

2533 words - 10 pages Creative Essay PaperGentian ArtaksiThe following is a transcript of a televised debate betweenThomas Hobbes and John Locke, as seen on November 24, 2093, viaTime~Warp Broadcasting Inc.COM: Television commentatorMED: Mediator of the debateHOB: Thomas HobbesLOC: John LockeDebate # 3Hobbes vs LockeNovember 24, 2093COM: Good evening and welcome to the third debate of our sevendebate series featuring some of the most prominent theorists of alltime

What is the Purpose of Life?

4209 words - 17 pages faculties of body and mind as that, though there be found one man sometimes manifestly stronger in body or of quicker mind than another, yet when all is reckoned together the difference between man and man is not so considerable” (Hobbes, 74). Hobbes uses this as a proof of human equality; however, this does not resemble equality in the slightest. Instead, what is created is a sort of balance between intelligence and strength, with each

Comparative Political Philosophy

1612 words - 7 pages , a couple years ago, there was the 99% vs. the 1% strike, where the 1% held all the riches. The middle class has not grown lately in today’s times; therefore the balance of power has shifted. The rich hold the most political power, and the poor are too caught up with social issues to focus on economy issues. Thus creating strikes and an uneasiness upon society. Aristotle defines a citizen as one who can perform their civic duties, similar to Plato

John lock argument and understanding of the book - political science - essay

1388 words - 6 pages Ngemba1 Mayele Degaule Ngemba Dr. David F. Ericson PSC 341 March 30,2017 Assignment III John Locke John lock introduces a different idea than Hobbes by stating that all men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. John believed that people had the right to live and freely and own property of their own that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Most of

Similar Essays

The Ideas Of Hobbes Vs Locke

964 words - 4 pages Hobbes Vs. LockeNick CappyThomas Hobbes and John Locke were English philosophers who attended Oxford University. Hobbes was born in Westport, England and Locke was born in Wrington. These two philosophers became famous because of their ideas about politics and the understanding of human nature. Thomas Hobbes had a very negative view on human nature. He describes human nature as being constantly at war with one another. According to Hobbes

Political Philosophy Essay

1742 words - 7 pages Political Philosophy Part One (Question 2) Aristotle, Locke, and Hobbes all place a great deal of importance on the state of nature and how it relates to the origin of political bodies. Each one, however, has a different conception of what a natural state is, and ultimately, this leads to a different conception of what a government should be, based on this natural state. Aristotle’s feelings on the natural state of man is much different

Political Theory Hobbes Aristotle Essay

3806 words - 15 pages completed, when separated from law and adjudication he is the worst of all" (1253a32). Aristotle is holding a view that speech in men prevents them from wreaking havoc upon themselves and the natural world.Turning now to the political philosophy of Hobbes there is a rejection of the perceptions of the ancient idea of a common, objective social Good as seen in the writings of Aristotle. In the ancient worldview justice is the proper functioning of

Human Nature In Realism And Liberalism

2441 words - 10 pages Thomas Hobbes (1588-1683) on the other hand, redefined the concept of human nature when challenging the classical view of human nature by Aristotle as idealistic perceptive of humans controlling their desire through reason, simultaneously being moral and social animals by nature. According to Hobbes, the human being is not moral, nor social, but has: “a perpetual and restless desire of power after power, that ceases only in death” (Hobbes