Arizona’s Immigration Law Essay

1634 words - 7 pages

It is clear that illegal immigration has gotten out of control and constringent measures need to be taken to protect the United States borders. The local Government of Arizona recently decided to take control of the situation, by passing the “Support our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act” {House Bill 2162}. This bill gives law enforcement officers and agencies the authority, to lawfully stop, detain and arrest anyone who appears to look like an illegal alien. The bill out-right condones racial profiling and it violates civil rights, as well!
Home Land security statistics on immigration verifies that there are approximately 11 million illegal immigrants who reside in the United States. In Arizona, there is an estimate of 460,000 unauthorized immigrants in 2009. (United States). Arizona borders with Mexico and it is implied that the majority of the illegal immigrants are of a Mexican background. These figures are understandable disturbing to Arizona’s local government primarily and the nation as a whole. The large influx of illegal immigrants is causing severe economic and social problems. Prisons, schools, and hospitals are the institutions that receive the direct blows of the state’s immigration problems. For these reasons, law makers in the State of Arizona justify their new “suspicious” immigration law (Matthews Mark K).
The strong voices of Arizona’s new immigration law are, Governor Jan Brewer, State Senator Russell Pearce (R), and the infamous lawyer Kris Kobach. Legal Director of Southern Poverty Law Center {SPLC}, Mary Bauer, states that some of the personalities behind Arizona’s new immigration law are highly suspicious. State Senator Russell Pearce (R), in 2006 forwards an email to his neo-Nazi supporters discriminating against Latinos and Jews. The email also scorns at media for promoting multiculturalism (Beirich Heidi).
In addition, State Senator Russell Pearce (R) seems to be quite friendly with J.T Ready who is known member of the Neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement. His association to the White Supremacist, J. T Ready has caused citizens to question his motivation behind the new immigration law (Beirich Heidi).
Kris Kobach the main legal mind behind Arizona’s new immigration law, in the past has been associated with racial profiling. Kobach was U.S Attorney John Ashcroft’s leading Advisor on immigration. He invented the “National Security Entry-Exit Registration System” {NSEERS}. The program was developed to closely observe Arab and Muslim Men; and sometimes U.S citizens. On December 1 2003, NSEERS was suspended. The termination was due to allegations of racial profiling and discrimination which violates civil rights. In April 2010, Kris Kobach and Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, was accused of racial profiling. These allegations led to a federal grand jury investigation. Kris Kobach is currently an attorney for legal arm for the Federation of American Immigration Reform {FAIR}. FAIR is listed as...

Find Another Essay On Arizona’s Immigration Law

Illegal Immigration and Its Effects on the United States

1488 words - 6 pages immigrants under the premise of reasonable suspension”(“Arizona’s Immigration Law Is Racist.”). One could say that this law is racist because it triggers racial profiling. In fact, it was so controversial that it even gained the attention of president Barrack Obama. President Obama invited the governor of Arizona to the White House to discuss this “misguided law” (“Arizona’s Immigration Law Is Racist.”). When you look at the other side of this

War on Immigration Essay

908 words - 4 pages favor the Arizona law while Liberal Progressives dismiss them as being racists. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement, "Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility," His department added that Arizona’s state law hampered the authority of the Obama administration to enforce national immigration policy and usurps federal authority to protect U.S. borders and American citizens

History of Immigration in the United States

1958 words - 8 pages taken it upon themselves to pass legislation for their state. For example, in 2009 the state of Arizona. Arizona’s Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act(Arizona SB 1070). This law directs law enforcement officials in the state of Arizona to question immigration documentation. This almost allows law enforcement to run rampant just because. Although, the police can only ask about an individuals immigration status if they are

Illegal Immigration and Equal Rights

1657 words - 7 pages . Furthermore; the effect of such restrictions is to cut the economic contribution immigrants can make. In most U.S. states, public agencies are forbidden by law from asking about a person’s immigration status. In California controversy over Proposition 187 is still a public issue, the key elements of the law are; all law enforcement agents who suspect that a person who has been arrested is in violation of immigration laws must investigate the

SB 1070; Is It The Right Law or Not?

1331 words - 5 pages Immigration is an issue that some sought to resolve in both violant and nonviolent manners. most of the time people think the government does not take the measures to tackle the problem at hand. “The responsibility that the state has toward the rights of its citizens. Illegal immigration directly violates some of these rights.” (The Police Should...) In order to enforce the law, police and other law enforcement groups must push to protect the

Immigration

1841 words - 8 pages these undocumented individuals in the country is seen to have a negative impact on the economic opportunities for Americans with verifiable legal citizenship. The economic arguments against alien workers include the cost to taxpayers in the form of ‘illegal’ and ‘criminal’ facets of illegal immigration, such as the law enforcement costs, border patrol and security systems, measures to deter, detain and deport the unauthorized, and related crimes

The Issue of Immigration in America

1083 words - 4 pages and have-nots are obvious. Although some argue that immigrants take full advantage, even more than they should of opportunities here in America, it does not change what the decision makers say. In 2011, Arizona state immigration laws got the whole nation in uproar. Some say the controversial law left much up to interpretation. Others believe the law has no business being in effect due to the racism and discrimination that many believe the bill

Immigration in Cobb County

1930 words - 8 pages topic or problem. Many peoples’ opinions stem from either economic or cultural fears of immigration so if law makers know their constituents reasons for being against immigration, they will be better able to make laws that address those concerns. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this quantitative survey is to determine public opinion in Cobb County as to why people are against immigration in order to better inform law makers about the

Profiling Immigration in the U.S

2438 words - 10 pages Immigration profiling has become a recent issue in the United States. This is primarily due to the fact that “the immigrant population in the United States grew considerably over the past 50 years” (Garcia 1). States are enacting laws that grant law enforcement the right to profile any one person that they believe is an illegal immigrant. On April 23, 2010, Arizona’s “Governor Brewer issued Executive Order 2010-09 requiring the Arizona Peace

Immigration Case Study

2157 words - 9 pages departments to work in tandem in an enforcement capacity that used to be solely the role of federal agents. Such enforcement not only raises the cost of doing business, but places business owners in a position to make decisions that reflect discriminatory practices in the name of cost effectiveness. As a result of this immigration reform, businesses are regrettably incentivized to either 1) circumvent the law, 2) decrease their profitability, 3

Undocumented Students

764 words - 3 pages outrage and discuss the following that corresponds to it. • Definition of the term “ Undocumented Students” • The three main obstacles for higher education (admission, tuition, and financial aid) • Arizona’s new immigration law • The D.R.E.A.M act The term “undocumented students” is given to the children of foreign nationals who entered the United States legally with their families, but remained without an authorization. In some cases they

Similar Essays

Illegal Immigration In Arizona Essay

1011 words - 4 pages state cost with immigration laws. Arizona is not alone in the battle of illegal immigration. Texas and California also deal with illegal immigration but Arizona is the only state to pass a new immigration law. Arizona is leading the way to fight illegal immigration and provide a safe environment for Arizona citizens. Many states are considering adding Arizona’s new immigration law also. What needs to happen before people see this issue as a real

Immigration Reform's Domino Effect Essay

1639 words - 7 pages unbiased deliverance of both the positive and negative of the immigration law reform and its effects. Wilson in this article discusses the debate over economic struggles and whether or not immigration is helping or hurting the state. It is said in this article that opinions from all over the state vary, with many saying that illegal immigration is taking away from the economy by offering cheap labor that depreciates the value of other workers and

Illegal Immigration: The Mexico U.S. Issue Essay

967 words - 4 pages consultancy fee. The DREAM Act, according to a study by the Center for American Progress (CAP), would “’add $329 billion to the U.S. economy by 2030’” (FAIR). Some states have begun to implement laws and other processes to stop illegal immigration. The E-Verify database and Arizona’s controversial SB-1070 law are two examples (CILE). According to Citizens for Law.org, the E-Verify method of 2010 helped businesses crosscheck the social security of

Arizona Law Essay

2478 words - 10 pages who are in favor of the new law believe that it should be enforced in order to curtail the influx of illegal immigrants into the United States as they believe it is the cause of an acute loss of jobs for legally present United States residents and United States Citizens alike. According to Arizona v. United States (11-182, “[the] state of Arizona maintains that it faced rampant illegal immigration, which increased crime and harmed Arizona’s