This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Army Problem Solving Model And The Rapid Decision Making And Synchronization Process

1858 words - 7 pages

Military leaders make decisions and solve problems every day. Some need a decision quickly while others can take time. The US Army has several decision-making methods to assist leaders. The Army Problem Solving Model (Process) (PSM) is a systematic approach to identifying the best possible solution to an issue or problem and a deliberate method of decision-making (FM 6-0, 2009). Leaders use it to solve a problem when time is not critical and they can put some thought into different solutions. The solution must be objective and based on facts in order for the decision to be relevant and practical. The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process (RDM) is a decision-making and synchronization technique typically used during the execution phase of an operation (FM 5-0, 2010). Besides its use during execution, this style of decision making is quick and focuses on the ability to modify the plan, due to changing circumstances, and synchronize those changes with subordinate elements. Determining which method to apply requires an understanding of the similarities and differences of both techniques.
Although the process a staff uses to solve a problem may differ, the foremost thing about the two methods is that they are systematic and proven ways to determine solutions. The military uses these methods to solve their problems or to identify ways to accomplish missions, even though the names are comparatively new. By using these approaches, new personnel can easily integrate into a planning process and have a good understanding of what is going on. Problem solving uses assumptions in order to develop solutions and RDM uses intuition. Intuition is a gut feeling and assumptions are educated guesses, they are essentially the same since both base identified information on experience or known facts. Neither one actually gives definitive information but this info is used because it is a normal occurrence or typical in the situation.
Obviously, both techniques are a process to make decisions based on relevant facts, with guidance from the commander, in order to achieve the desired end state. Although the steps may differ between the methods, the final step, implementation, is the same. A decision is worthless if not implemented. The process used may not be the same but in order to achieve the end state subordinates need to receive orders and directions. Another way that PSM and RDM are alike is with the use of Course of Action (COA) development. Both develop a solution that is capable of arrive at the desired end state; the difference is the number of COAs developed and the process by which they are approved or judged.
Understanding the differences helps to ensure the appropriate method to use. The most notable and important difference is the length of time each takes. PSM is time consuming due to the analytical process used to arrive at a viable solution whereas RDM is quicker because it relies more on a combination of intuition and...

Find Another Essay On Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process

Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization

1478 words - 6 pages 1. Compare and Contrast the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) with the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process. (C100) If we draw a parallel between the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process, which are in basic different methods, we can see a lot of similarities and equivalences. In the first place, the most important common feature for the Army Problem Solving Model

The Army Problem Solving Model Essay

917 words - 4 pages Military leaders make decisions and solve problems every day. Some need a decision quickly while others can take time. The US Army has several decision-making methods to assist leaders. The Army Problem Solving Model (Process) is a systematic approach to identifying the best possible solution to an issue or problem and a deliberate method of decision-making. (FM 6-0, 2009) Leaders use it to solve a problem when time is not critical and they

Decision Making Process Model

1776 words - 7 pages most senior executives and experts to search. One other factor is the legitimate power allocated to positions of authority in the hierarchy. Power holders may choose to behave in ways which further their own or others interests. There are some behavioral factors that can lead to the deviation from the rational model of decision making process. Decisions fail because behavioral factors weaken problem-sensing or effective development and

Decision Making and Planning Process

1195 words - 5 pages Running head: Decision Making and Planning ProcessDecision Making and Planning ProcessAndrea JonesUniversity of PhoenixDecision Making and Planning ProcessDecision making and planning are a critical processes in any organization. Decision making is the foundation of planning. All organizations engage in planning activities, but no two organizations plan in exactly the same manner. The purpose of strategic management is to develop an effective

MGT 350 Critical Thinking and Decision Making: Decision Making Model

1439 words - 6 pages Decision-Making ModelUniversity of PhoenixMGT 350: Critical Thinking: Strategies in Decision MakingJuly 22, 2004Decision-Making ModelAfter doing some research on the Internet and reading some articles, I found the Josephson Institute of Ethics Seven-Step Path to Better Decisions. This model, found in the book Making Ethical Decisions, by Michael Josephson, closely resembles the process I utilize on a daily basis. I work for a professional hockey

The Decision-Making Process

2363 words - 10 pages is decision making, half of the decisions made by managers within organizations ultimately fail. Therefore, increasing effectiveness in decision making is an important part of maximizing your effectiveness at work. Traditional Decision-Making Process There are five basic steps in the traditional decision-making process: 1. Problem recognition, 2. Information search, 3. Construction of alternative, 4. Choice, and 5. Implementation (Adler, 2008

Problem Analysis and Decision Making Techniques

3907 words - 16 pages Corp. Human Resources Department ] departments and managers alike to recognize these problems before they escalate into more serious issues. When a problem is brought to the manager's attention, one of the goals must be to narrow the issues down and identify the specifics of the problem. Management cannot solve a problem unless first they understand the root cause. Jean Sawyer, in her article "Problem-solving success tips" indicates that it is

Problem Analysis and Decision-Making Techniques Paper

2059 words - 8 pages Part III: Problem AnalysisTake a moment and think about your personal care routine. Take a shower,wash your hair, and brush your teeth. Pretty standard. When you go to thestore to purchase your family's personal products, do you just assume thatthe products will not harm you? If it is on the store shelf, it must be safe, right. WrongDid you know that nearly all the mainstream personal care products sold inmost stores contain carcinogens, toxins

Problem Analysis and Decision-Making Technique

1061 words - 4 pages In this paper, we will be analyzing the two alternative solutions to our continuing problem. We have utilized the Decision-Making Tools and Techniques that we have studdied to analyze each alternative, and will selected what we think is the best idea and option. Finally, after examining the alternative solution, we will identify three influences on our choice.The Helping HandOne of the alternative solutions is the helping hand provided by

Problem analysis and decision making technique

1378 words - 6 pages IntroductionFollowing the announcement for this year's "Employee of the Year" there have been many changes. Working relationships are strained and communication is poor. Envy and jealousy have caused team members to draw away from their leaders. After several days spent framing the problem, Team B held a brainstorming session identifying three alternatives to produce a solution. The pros and cons of each alternative were discussed and documented

An Analysis of Bateman and Snell Decision-Making Model: MGT 350 Decision Making Model Analysis paper

909 words - 4 pages introduce you to Bateman and Snell's decision-making model. In their model they state, "the ideal decision making process moves through six steps: (1) identify and diagnose the problem, (2) generate alternative solutions, (3) evaluate alternatives, (4) make the choice, (5) implement the decision, and (6) evaluate the decision" (Bateman and Snell, 2004, p. 87). Many people use decision-making models in their everyday lives, they do not always realize they

Similar Essays

The Army Problem Solving Model And The Rapid Decision Making And Synchronization Process

1468 words - 6 pages Compare and contrast the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) with the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process. (C 100) The Army Problem Solving Model (APSM) as well as the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process (RDSP) are the forms of decision-making process or techniques with a systematic, logical approach to problem designed for commanders to help make better decision and to find better solution as problem occur

The Army Problem Solving Model And The Rapid Decision Making And Synchronization Process

1123 words - 4 pages 1. Compare and Contrast the Army Problem Solving Model Process with the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process. (C100) The Army’s Problem solving model is a seven-step process where leaders take a systematic approach to define a problem, develop possible solutions to solve the problem, arrive at the best solution, and implement the solution. This process will identify the problem, gather information, develop criteria, develop

The Army Problem Solving Model And The Rapid Decision Making And Synchronization Process

1832 words - 7 pages Compare and Contrast the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) with the Rapid Decision making and Synchronization Process. (C100) The Army Problem Solving Model, and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process (RDSP) are systems that commanders use to solve issues that may arise. Both systems require time to complete. Commanders use Army problem solving when the problem is the pressing issue, and time is secondary. Commanders and

The Army Problem Solving Model And The Rapid Decision Making And Synchronization Process

1986 words - 8 pages Compare and Contrast the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) with the Rapid Decision making and Synchronization Process. (C100) The Army Problem Solving Model, and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process (RDSP) are systems that commanders use to solve issues that may arise. While both systems are effective tools that commanders and their staff can use to solve problems, each system has strengths and limitations. The Army