The article Infection Control in Home Care was given by Emily Rhinehart in April 2001. This article is about the home care and infection control in the United States of America. This article stated that, in the past decades, the scope and intensity of home care have increased, whereas the strategies and prevention solutions of infection surveillance and control efforts have fallen behind (Rhinehart, 2001). Lack of applicable and consistent methods for surveillance and acute-care practices of prevention are needed to control infections. The article provides an understanding about the appropriate strategy and need of training to assess the infectious disease and their risk. In addition, the author has also stated the development of prevention strategies (Rhinehart, 2001).
This research study is based on a particular problem effective control measurement for home care. The researcher has developed some research questions to conduct the research study effectively. The research questions are as followed:
How can we provide high-tech home care to the patience?
What are strategies to Infection Surveillance, Prevention, and Control in Home Care?
The theoretical and conceptual foundation of the journal article was based on appropriate and sound academic literatures and concepts. Emily Rhinehart, the author of this journal article has evaluated many literatures and concept to answer the research questions. The researcher has identified that 9655 agencies in the USA, serve home care to the patients collected data. The researcher gathered this data through the basic statistic about home care, association for home care, 1999 (Rhinehart, 2001).
The researcher has used the definitions of system surveillance given by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) system. In addition, the research has also relied on the laboratory data to complete this research (Garner, Jarvis, Emori, Horan, Hughes, 1998). Information given in the article, Infection surveillance in home care: device-related incidence rates were also used by the researchers to accomplish the research.
A program given by Missouri Home Care Alliance in 1997, were also evaluated to identify the high-tech ways to provide home care to the patients (Luehm, Fauerbach, 1999). In order to analyze the strategies for the Infection Surveillance, Prevention, and Control in Home Care, some methods are also given by The Arizona Association for Home Care, which were used by Emily Rhinehart to measure the rates of urinary tract infections (Woomer, Long, Anderson, Greenberg, 1999). According to the article ‘National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): Description of surveillance methods’, which is evaluated by the researcher, laboratory and cultural tests are not practical in home care. The researcher had also taken the support of infection programs of CDC’s...