This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Article Review Of Parliamentary Vs Presidential Systems Ubc Poli 101 Essay

567 words - 3 pages

Ammar Fayyaz
ID: 32419153
POL1 101 001
Discussion L1F
TA: MAX GARDINER
Article Review: “The Institutional Foundation of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems”
Writers Terry M. Moe and Michael Caldwell describe the two most prevalent forms of democratic systems, namely parliamentary and presidential systems. They question whether a parliamentary system with “centralization of power” is better than a presidential system associated with having “separation of powers”. A literary review on the aforementioned forms of government suggest that both have their strengths and weaknesses based on how centralized authoritative power is. The writers, observing key differences in how power and bureaucracy is established in the parliamentary and presidential systems of the UK and US respectively, explain how the dynamics of choice influence the polarized structures of government in both countries.
In a presidential system, the principle of “separation of powers” arises due to several agencies using public authority towards their best interests. These interest groups challenge the authority enjoyed by the president and legislature, working against effectual organization carried out by the authorities. The leadership faces challenges due to political uncertainty triggered by opposition, political compromise in the form of checks and balances, and fear of the state. The legislators, pressurized by public authority, generally work according to the objectives of interest groups. The president, however, enjoys autonomous power to make rules and evaluate decisions but falls prey to formalization of the structure; hence, efficiency of their government is reduced.
The formulization of structure, however, helps different interest groups and legislators to hold their own political stance against the sovereign president. However, in a classic Westminster parliamentary system, the ruling political party enjoys ultimate legislative control, with no formal...

Find Another Essay On Article Review of Parliamentary vs Presidential Systems - UBC POLI 101 - Essay

What are the relative merits and drawbacks of parliamentary and presidential systems? Why have most East European countries adopted parliamentary systems?

2723 words - 11 pages separately from the legislature and members of the executive cabinet are appointed from outside any of the elected legislatures. Presidents are also forced to serve a fixed term in office, unlike a legislative cabinet, which has an ambiguous duration.While these are the two basic models of governance, this essay will also examine hybrid models, often referred to as 'semi-presidential systems', or 'presidential-parliamentary systems' . These forms of

Parliamentary vs Presidential Essay

1168 words - 5 pages (16). Of course, however, the systems also have their differences. To begin with, parliamentary systems are decisive while presidential systems are resolute. Parliamentary fosters a style of politics and policymaking that is probably more institutionalized, centered on its political parties, while presidentialism fosters a more personalized and free-floating style of leadership, centered on individual politicians and smaller, less established

Parliamentary vs Presidential

2050 words - 9 pages (16). Of course, however, the systems also have their differences. To begin with, parliamentary systems are decisive while presidential systems are resolute. Parliamentary fosters a style of politics and policymaking that is probably more institutionalized, centered on its political parties, while presidentialism fosters a more personalized and free-floating style of leadership, centered on individual politicians and smaller, less established

5% article review for a businesses 101 class - Evcc Business 101 - Essay

564 words - 3 pages Name: Title: How to join the 1%, The Economist Date of article: May 16, 2015 Word count: 566 Topic covered: Business What is the article about? What I see the main point of this article is the author is trying to show the reader that there is a 1% that is different then the other 99%. In this article the author is showing us that there is a majority of people that are living the in a situation that just go to work and make small salaries. Then

The Parliamentary system vs. The Presidential system

1455 words - 6 pages the separation of powers between the two systems. In the presidential system the powers are pretty much divided into the three branches of government which are the executive, legislature and judicial. The official serving the terms such as in the Senate or House of Representatives as well as the president serves the fixed terms but in the parliamentary system the offices in executive are basically derived from the legislature and can be dismissed

The American Presidential System vs. The Canadian Parliamentary System

1978 words - 8 pages to both systems of governments and the strengths and weaknesses to both systems of government will be examined and explained in depth for a better understanding of both the Canadian Parliamentary system and the American Presidential system.The term separation of powers refers to the separation of powers between executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. The American system of government has three separate but equal branches of

Psychology, Effects of Distraction - PSYC 101, UBC - Research Paper

1107 words - 5 pages The Varying Effects of Distraction on Memory Demonstrated Between Different Age Groups UBC Student #25110107 Word Count: 1,106 Distractions are everywhere. They can be a pop-up advertisement from a computer program, or an ambulance speeding by you at a traffic light; whatever shape they take, this form of intervening activity plays a major role in the decline of memory performance. Acting as a barrier in cognitive functioning, interference has

Types of Democratic Governmental Systems: Presidencial and Parliamentary Systems

1402 words - 6 pages For many years, politicians have argued about the preferences of two types of democratic governmental systems, presidential systems and parliamentary systems. Firstly this paper will give a brief theoretical background and then analyse the merits and demerits of both systems, and will conclude that the presidential system functions as a more effective and desirable governmental system. Political researchers such as Juan Linz, Arend Lijphart

Strenghts and Weaknesses of Presidential Systems

1252 words - 5 pages The topic of this essay is „Presidential systems – strenghts and weaknesses.“ I chose this topic because I am very interested into the comparison of presidential and parliamentary systems. For quiet a long time, I have been trying to figure out which one is better for countries. This essay might be a good stepping stone for me to figure it out. This essay will go step by step analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of presidential systems

The comparison of parliamentary political system in Sweden and semi-presidential political system in France and the results for Turkey

3339 words - 13 pages INTRODUCTIONDemocracy is spreading all around the world in different forms. Countries shape democracy according to their own needs and political structures. So, democracy as a political system is represented in different ways in the world. Two of the more common appearing style of democracy in the political structures of the countries' is presidential and parliamentary political systems. Parliamentary and presidential political systems also have

The summary of the article "The Curse of Econ 101" by James Kwak and others - UIC - Essay

843 words - 4 pages THE CURSE OF ECON 101 BY JAMES KWAK AND TWO RESPONSES Quan Tran Minh The main article “The Curse of Econ 101” was published in January 2017 by The Atlantic and written by Professor James Kwak. At first glance, the title “The Curse of Econ 101” might be confusing and triggered the curiosity of most readers. Professor Kwak spent most of his article criticizing the “economism,” which he defined as a “misleading application of basic lessons from

Similar Essays

Parliamentary And Presidential Systems Essay

1828 words - 7 pages When looking at the different political systems across the world, parliamentary and presidential systems can be seen as two eminent and highly successful democracy as used most famously by Britain the United States respectively. Due to their difference in the system of governing, the role of an Australian Prime Minister may vary from that of an American President. Thus, differentiation of the system may incur a verity of responsibility and

Parliamentary And Presidential Systems Of Government

2935 words - 12 pages unpredictability and instability of the American system. In justification to this, differences and similarities amongst both systems will be accounted for, as well as the strengths and flaws that follow in order to evaluate which system offers a better balance overall. Part I: Features of the Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government Role of the Head of State and Government: The parliamentary system of government dates back to 18th

Comparing And Contrasting Two Governmental Systems: Parliamentary Vs Presidential

763 words - 3 pages Parliamentary System versus Presidential System The way that a country is controlled by the government depends on the relationship between the legislative and executive authority. Most democratic nations, today, generally use one of two governmental systems, either a parliamentary system or a presidential system. Today most of Europe prefers to use a parliamentary system, whereas the presidential form of government is preferred in places such

The Supreme Court: Protector Of Civil Liberties Ubc/ Poli 101 Research Paper

1964 words - 8 pages notwithstanding clause, by the Parliament, would introduce bias into the intended impartiality judgment of a judge and create an imbalance of power among the branches of government. As such, the implications of parliamentary involvement in the Supreme Court suggests that it is for the best interest of both branches of government as well as our constitutional democracy that the two powers be kept separate from each other. Therefore