Authority is a basic element in the structure of social life. It is more or less effective in any human interrelation. It is functional in a spectrum from a small group of individuals to a whole population of a society.
Some aspect of authority is a requirement of all communal living, and it is only the individual dwelling in isolation that is not forced to respond, with defiance or obedience, to the commands of hierarchy. In a general view, authority couples with obedience and both of them seem to be two components of one package.
The legal and moral aspects of obedience are of enormous important, but we know very little about how most people behave in incoherent situations. This is the reason authority can be abused and turned into illegal and immoral sacred.
The dilemma inherent in obedience and authority is ancient, as old as the story of Abraham, but the question of whether one should obey when commands conflict with conscience has not been argued because the commands are allegedly sacred.
So, the term “sacred” can be a holy command, a holy person, or even an animal, an object. It is “sacred” because its rationality and originality cannot be proved.
Sacred as such is not necessarily a classified religion or sect. Prior to religion, the term “sacred” had been a primitive phenomenon inspiring ancient rituals: for example, sacrificing an individual or animal for the sake of “sacred” gods.– the package of sacrifice / sacred was mostly accompanied by bloody and ceremonial acts of rituals such as amputation, genital severing, cannibalism, and many other types of ritual acts from which traces have been discovered in archaeological works.
So, a series of various sacred figures, objects, places, or concepts connect themselves with the supernatural, or the divine. These can greatly revere with a deep respect and veneration because of a complete lack of request on the vital question of rationality. This process is due to the people’s need to find the meaning of life in a most sacred interpretation.
When sacred is a leader, he does not intend to help people without expecting blind submission in return. The followers’ submissiveness, at least, is the reward for his help; a form of help in which the ultimate goal, of the helper, is to increase his own sacredness.
For his docile followers, a sacred leader is a wolf clad in a sheep clothes but when the sheep are not docile, the sacred turns into his real nature, a vicious wolf. Rarely, he can be a shepherd.
The sacred is necessarily neither a competent leader nor a hero on any occasion. At best, he incarnates a Hollywood picture; his inner emptiness is compensated by his bogus charisma.
His personality can be at the same time a maladapted emptiness for psycho-criminology, though he would be regarded as a sacred guide by his blind followers.
The sacred is believed to be morally and spiritually excellent, but his best quality is his skill to provide role models of what some others would like to...