Beneficial Animal Testing
Animal testing has always been plagued with controversy on its ethical issues by animal activist groups and supportive scientists. Is it morally just to experiment and sacrifice laboratory animals on behalf of human research? Dr. Gina Solomon MD wrote her article regarding the benefits of animal testing to protect the human race and all other species. Her article “The Lesser Evil” shows the beneficial and positive aspects of animal experimentation. She approves the notion for animal testing but requests greater regulation and gentler methods of testing when scientifically possible. Dr. Solomon’s article was published in the Earth Island Journal, Autumn 2002, v17, i3, pg 47.
Dr. Gina Solomon MD works for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). She is a senior scientist and physician of the Health and Environment program. Dr. Solomon’s article is trustworthy and credible because she is a licensed practitioner of medicine and a chief scientist. She relies on personal experience and scientific data to justify the use of animal testing. She works for a reputable nonprofit organization whose opinions are valued for the protection of human life. Dr. Solomon focuses her article toward those who are undecided or opposed to animal testing. She hopes to persuade her audience of the scientific human advantage gained by animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is essential for the protection from harmful chemicals and pesticides for all living creatures on Earth. The animal research allows scientist to better recognize and distinguish poisonous materials for humans and wildlife. Animal activist agencies, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), are trying to abolish the use of animal testing for scientific knowledge. If these groups were to succeed in their quest for eliminating animal experimentation, unregulated consumer products would be allowed to sell on the market. These products may contain toxic chemicals that cause serious health side effects. Dr. Solomon writes about these issues in the temporal context. Her article is written about the present opinions and controversies caused by animal testing.
Dr. Solomon uses a mixture of denotative and connotative language in her article. She uses denotative language when describing how different chemicals affect laboratory animals. She also uses denotative language when explaining the various organizations and legislation passed by Congress in favor of public safety laws. Dr. Solomon writes connotatively when explaining the necessity of animal testing to better understand the chemical effects on humans and wildlife. Industries “would love to manufacture and profit from chemicals without worrying that the public will find out its products may case serious health effects. The chemical manufactures would love not to worry about EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) using scientific...