Beneficial Animal Testing Essay

1056 words - 4 pages

Beneficial Animal Testing

Animal testing has always been plagued with controversy on its ethical issues by animal activist groups and supportive scientists. Is it morally just to experiment and sacrifice laboratory animals on behalf of human research? Dr. Gina Solomon MD wrote her article regarding the benefits of animal testing to protect the human race and all other species. Her article “The Lesser Evil” shows the beneficial and positive aspects of animal experimentation. She approves the notion for animal testing but requests greater regulation and gentler methods of testing when scientifically possible. Dr. Solomon’s article was published in the Earth Island Journal, Autumn 2002, v17, i3, pg 47.

Dr. Gina Solomon MD works for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). She is a senior scientist and physician of the Health and Environment program. Dr. Solomon’s article is trustworthy and credible because she is a licensed practitioner of medicine and a chief scientist. She relies on personal experience and scientific data to justify the use of animal testing. She works for a reputable nonprofit organization whose opinions are valued for the protection of human life. Dr. Solomon focuses her article toward those who are undecided or opposed to animal testing. She hopes to persuade her audience of the scientific human advantage gained by animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is essential for the protection from harmful chemicals and pesticides for all living creatures on Earth. The animal research allows scientist to better recognize and distinguish poisonous materials for humans and wildlife. Animal activist agencies, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), are trying to abolish the use of animal testing for scientific knowledge. If these groups were to succeed in their quest for eliminating animal experimentation, unregulated consumer products would be allowed to sell on the market. These products may contain toxic chemicals that cause serious health side effects. Dr. Solomon writes about these issues in the temporal context. Her article is written about the present opinions and controversies caused by animal testing.

Dr. Solomon uses a mixture of denotative and connotative language in her article. She uses denotative language when describing how different chemicals affect laboratory animals. She also uses denotative language when explaining the various organizations and legislation passed by Congress in favor of public safety laws. Dr. Solomon writes connotatively when explaining the necessity of animal testing to better understand the chemical effects on humans and wildlife. Industries “would love to manufacture and profit from chemicals without worrying that the public will find out its products may case serious health effects. The chemical manufactures would love not to worry about EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) using scientific...

Find Another Essay On Beneficial Animal Testing

Animal Rights Essay

856 words - 3 pages Animal Testing: Right or wrong? A topic that has always been close to many people hearts is the one of animal testing. Some believe that it is right completely, some that it is right but only under certain circumstances and others that believe that all animal testing is wrong and will go to extraordinary lengths to stop it. There are many organisations that are against animal testing and that arrange protest marches and demonstrations against

Without Sacrifice We Can Gain Nothing

719 words - 3 pages found out how to treat diabetes, smallpox, measles, and many other cures by animal testing. Many surgeries have been perfected by animal research. These medical advances also help other animals with. Many surgeries, cures, and procedures can be used on animals and humans. Therefore, the animal testing we do is beneficial to more than just mankind. The question is, save one animal from a lab or save many animals and humans all over the world with

Moral Rights: A Cry for Help

1321 words - 5 pages “Life is as dear to a mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not die, so do other creatures.”, is a quote by His Holiness The Dalai Lama, in regards for animals. Animal testing, also known as animal research, refers to the use of nonhuman animals in scientific experimentation. Vertebrate animals, including mice, birds, fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs and cats are annually used

The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

1315 words - 5 pages and tested on animals (Breen)? Understanding the body’s functions requires scientific discoveries from animal research, and because humans and animals share more than 250 common illnesses, testing on animals is extremely beneficial to humans. Opponents of animal testing advocate alternative means such as using computer models in experiments. They cite differences in the genetic makeup of common lab animals from humans as evidence that


937 words - 4 pages animal research could be misleading and could damage the health of humans. While animals are being tortured every day and the results are often inaccurate when used by humans, there are other ways to conduct research that lead to beneficial results. Alternatives to animal testing are efficient, dependable, cruelty-free, take less time to complete, and are cheaper than using animals for testing. Human skin cells that are grown in test tubes are

The Issues of Animal Testing?

1128 words - 5 pages nameless diseases some time in the future. Of course, we also should be concerned about how animals are treated in laboratories, and we should all work to minimize the number of animals who suffer. After all, animal testing would be more beneficial if it required less suffering of animals.

Case Study: The Benefits of Animal Testing

1757 words - 7 pages consumers.  Though some may disagree, animal testing is both beneficial and practical to the well being of both humans and animals. Animal testing saves countless lives and plays a practical role in medical advances. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. In 2009, heart disease claimed the lives of some 616,067 people (“FastStats”). However, due to the continuous

Use of Animal in Scientific Research

1584 words - 6 pages turn out to be more harmful than beneficial in the final product. Death could occur in taking a certain type of medicine, yet the drug could pass through animal testing. Animal testing is unsafe. Genetically, animals are not the same as humans. “Animals In Science” declares, “Animal models of disease are an outdated and inadequate methodology for predicting what treatments are safe and effective for humans” (“Animals In Science”). Moreover

Silent Pain

1038 words - 4 pages testing does not always give accurate, dependable results. The results conducted from animal research could be misleading and could damage the health of humans. While animals are being tortured every day and the results are often inaccurate when used by humans, there are other ways to conduct research that lead to beneficial results. Alternatives to animal testing are efficient, dependable, cruelty-free, take less time to complete, and are cheaper

Animal Testing

769 words - 4 pages would disgrace our humanity much more if we tested it on kids and adults. Even though we did do that; since our life span if longer than animals like rabbits and rats, it would take much more time to see the potential effects. Animal testing is cheap. There is a large quantity. Also, they are easily bred. The cost of human testing would be high. This justifies the question, and again proves that animal testing is beneficial. To conclude, the

The Effects of Animal Experimentation

1879 words - 8 pages structures between an animal and a human are different, and “In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used” (“Should Animals”). Human cells would be much more efficient being the product will be aimed toward humans. Researchers have also been updating computer systems. The growth of computer technology has been very beneficial to

Similar Essays

The Controversy Of Animal Testing Essay

1302 words - 5 pages used to develop alternatives to certain types of animal testing, such as the testing of cosmetics. I think that this is a great use of money. Rather than spend this money on the military or something else that is not beneficial, the money is being contributed to help save the lives of animals. It would be great if Canada and other countries would follow in the footsteps of Europe and try to find alternatives to animal

Animal Testing Essay

885 words - 4 pages . National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) too, used animal testing to learn more about moon and outer space by sending space monkeys. Animal testing is not only beneficial for human but to animals as well. Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) and Feline Leukemia virus (FeLV) infections are the major cause of deaths in cats. The disease was cured with the animal testing which led to the founding of vaccine. This is considered one of the revolutionary success in the veterinary science. Animal testing is not cruel, it helps the human race and animals survive and prosper.

Research Essay

759 words - 4 pages never use or consume. Also people are supporting animal research because they are considered similar to humans. When in reality this is false, animals are different than people, thus their testing results are not always useful or practical for human comparisons. Everyone thinks a lot of good things can come out of animal research but that is not the case. Animal research is not beneficial, for us or the animals. With this in mind, I would

Animal Testing And People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals

1307 words - 5 pages computer technology when processing drug development and testing. The scientists believe the discovery process is more efficient with human tissue. “If you have more information on human genes, what’s the point of going back to animals?” (Pharmagene Cofounder Gordon Baxter) It is crazy how places like England can realize alternative methods are more beneficial that animal tests. This message from Pharmagene needs to spread around the world. The