This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Bias Of The Canadan Supreme Court

916 words - 4 pages

Supreme Court AppointmentsSince most papers are owned by one company in Canada, I made sure I had an independent voice. "The Western Standard" and "Toronto Star" articles are very polar in their approach on the subject of the recent court appointments.The Star reports on the committee in parliament. The Western focuses on the subject of the judicial review committee. Both articles show the Conservative Party opinion that the appointment of Louise Charron and Rosalie Abella are just a way for the Liberal government to push forward their agenda.The Star, like this essay, stays outside the issue at hand. It is more to designed to state that a meeting did take place. The only real issues brought up are partisan politics. It totally avoids the elephant in the room. By looking at the process. Though it does say that more media attention has been brought to the issue and thus educating the public. It fails to give any relevant information. The trivial seems to interest the author. It is one step up from a Parliamentary hill gossip column. It attempts to portray the Conservative contingent, Peter Mackay and Vic Toews as whiners. It attempts to cast a sore loser feel to them. "The Tories refused to endorse the nominations of the two Ontario judges while protesting what they dismissed as 'a rubber-stamp process" The "they", shows the author feels distant from the Conservative cause.I do not know if it was done deliberately but misdirection is used. Panetta states that the conservatives issued a news release, and then starts a direct quote saying that the judges are more than qualified. For the skimmer reader it would look like or make them believe that the conservatives are hypocritical.At the end of the article is where he finally gets into the real issues. And the comments made by Vic Toews . The issue of the undemocratic nature of the procedure and the activism of the appointees seem to be a way for the Prime Minister to push ahead his agenda. The comments seem to have been kept in context. The same-sex argument has to be put in whenever the Conservative are involved. The Conservatives comments are given more air time in this article. It might be an attempt to balance the bias of the article.The article is very narrow in its approach to this. It main focus is on Peter Mackay and Vic Toews. It tries to use Colter as a comparison to balance. Colters' comments are much like the author in that they are negative towards the conservatives. The focus on these two is because they are the only ones voicing there objection to the process.The article finishes off with "The federal cabinet must still meet and give final approval...

Find Another Essay On Bias of the canadan supreme court

The Supreme Court Essay

1106 words - 4 pages The Supreme Court The Supreme Court has had many different places where it was located over the years. There has been a struggle to find a permanent home for the most powerful court of law. At first, the meetings were in the Merchant Exchange Building in New York City. The court then followed the nation's capitol to Philadelphia in 1790. In 1800 the court again relocated to Washington DC. At first they spent their time meeting in

The Political Supreme Court Essay

587 words - 2 pages The Political Supreme Court      It is nearly impossible to avoid politics during the appointments of high profile positions; therefore, the idea that Supreme Court is above politics when referring to its appointments is giving to much credit to that entity. The appointments of the Supreme Court, as with any political body, correlate no only to the media's portraying, but also to interest group the President wishes to

The Quasi-Legislative Effect of the Supreme Court of Canada

2636 words - 11 pages The Quasi-Legislative Effect of the Supreme Court of Canada Daniele Zerbo 300119020 25 March 2014 INTRODUCTION The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982 symbolized a new era for Canada. Championed by Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the charter entrenched the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian society, and allowed for those rights to be enforced by any individual should they be infringed upon. The enactment of the Charter of Rights and

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Supreme Court

765 words - 4 pages Court Invalidates..”) The Supreme Court decision was that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is no longer relevant since states do not judge based on voting discrimination since the Civil right Era. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. stated, “our country has changed” in a 5-4 court ruling. As the Supreme Court finds that the Congress has exceeds itself under the 15th amendment, which guarantees that voting rights cannot be denied based on race. As of

The United States Supreme Court

670 words - 3 pages The laws of the United States of America are governed by the Constitution which is broken down into three main branches. These branches are the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch of the government is made up of the Supreme Court, Circuit court of Appeals, Specialized Courts and District Court. Congress passes laws, the President either passes or vetoes these laws, but the Supreme Court decides if

The United States Supreme Court

1975 words - 8 pages THE UNITED STATESSUPREMECOURTI've chosen to research on the Supreme Court and it's Justices. This seemed like an interesting topic to me, because someday I want to be a part of the legal system.The Supreme Court of the United States, composed of a chief justice and eight associate justices, is at the apex of the U.S. judicial system. Provisions for the making of the Supreme Court were made in Article III of the U.S. Constitution. In addition to

Path to the Supreme Court

1145 words - 5 pages Article III of the Constitution of the United States vests judicial power in “one supreme Court”. With incredible adaptability, the Constitution has stood the test of time. Largely due to the limited specificity as to the application of its words, the Constitution has allowed the character of the Court to be historically defined by the individuals who have held the position of “Chief Justice of the United States”. The ideology and individual

A Brief History of the US Supreme Court

1044 words - 5 pages John Jay took his vows on October 19, 1789. John Rutledge took both pledges in open court on August 12, 1795. Oliver Ellsworth took both vows in open court at the sitting of the Supreme Court of the United States on March 8, 1796. John Marshall took his promises on February 4, 1801. Roger B. Taney took both promises of office on March 28, 1836. Salmon P. Pursue took both vows on December 15, 1864. Morrison R. Waite took both promises on

U.S. Supreme Court and the Impact of Sentencing

1753 words - 7 pages . The judge made him sign a pledge, pay $3.76, be industrious, and become a sober man. Since this time there have been many conditions set on this type of agreement with the court. This type of penance, and proof of good behavior, kept a convict from jail or prison and is now called probation. Due to the many variations of sentenced conditions, there were court cases which where brought up to and addressed by the many State Supreme Courts. Many

The Supreme Court case of Reno v. ACLU

549 words - 2 pages The Supreme Court case of Reno vs. ACLU was a pivotal case in American History. It took place in 1996, and was the Supreme Court's first case dealing with the issue of cyberspace. The case involves the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), which makes it against the law for minors to view "obscene or indecent" messages or images on the Internet.1 When the president signed the bill, the American Civil Liberties Union (the ACLU) filed a suit

The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade

1819 words - 7 pages The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade In 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Roe V. Wade. Jane Roe was a single mother trying to raise one child on a limited income. She was living in Dallas Texas when she became pregnant with another child. There were no medical issues that would have prevented her from carrying this child to full term. The lack of income and already having a child was her deciding factor. In

Similar Essays

Judicial Process Of The Supreme Court

1167 words - 5 pages Nature’s Judicial Process in the Supreme Court consists of decision-making; based on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Although the Supreme Court has the capability to decide all extended cases; it also has the power to ascend under the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court its jurisdiction in the Judicial Branch of government. The Judicial Process interpret the laws that are established in the Supreme Court; thus, allowing the

The Supreme Court Opinions Of Clarence Thomas

1805 words - 7 pages The Supreme Court has embraced its objective to assist the government in its framework and structuring through law as well as the interpretation of the law. However, plenty of their work has remained a mystery to the general public. Jeffrey Toobin enlightened the audience in The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court; however, most curious to me was the manner in which Jeffrey Toobin speculates that Justice Thomas, a Justice he has

Important Cases Of The Us Supreme Court

731 words - 3 pages Important Cases of the US Supreme Court The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the constitutional guarantees contained in amendments to the constitution. Among these Guaranteed rights are the freedoms of religion, speech, and press, along with the right of protection against illegal search and seizure, equal protection under the law, and the right to counsel. These rights all contained in the first amendment to the constitution are

The Supreme Court Essay

1067 words - 4 pages In 1787 Article three of the constitution created the Supreme Court, but not until 1789 was it configured. The way it was originally set up was with one Chief Justice and five associate judges, with all six members being appointed for life. This court serves as the “supreme law of the land”, it has the power to determine if state or federal laws are in conflict with how the Court interprets the constitution.      Presently the supreme