This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki: Was It Justified?

823 words - 3 pages

The United States dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan on August 1945. They claimed that it was to end World War II without risking the death of hundreds of thousands American lives during a planned invasion of the Japanese mainland. The President at the time, Harry Truman had other reasons in mind when dropping the bombs like, to justify the tremendous cost of testing and researching the bombs, to intimidate and impress the U.S.S.R., and to get even with the Japanese for bombing Pearl Harbor. I believe that the United States was not justified in dropping two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.World War II ended only days after the bombs were dropped, on August 15, 1945; Japan accepted the Potsdam Declaration by the Allied Powers, thereby surrendering unconditionally. "We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such action." (Declaration) The bombing on Japan did end World War II.One thing that I do agree with Truman is his thought that it will save American lives to bomb Japan instead of having a land invasion. I am very patriotic and pro life. I agree with President Truman, the land invasion would have cost America many soldiers. But that does not mean that I agree with him dropping the bombs. It is unknown previously how many lives could have been saved because it was all estimations and guesses. The main people that were involved with the bombing were the captions of the planes that flew over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Those people were not over the area long enough to get radiation so they were not effected by the bombing.The atomic bombs were unnecessary for victory in World War II and were used primarily as a tool to impress and contain the Russians. (Long) The United States wanted to win this war without aid from the Soviets. They didn't want to be known as the nation that sought help from a communist nation. Truman was worried about the spread of communism, particularly in Eastern Europe and Asia, areas that he thought Joseph Stalin would seek to control since he helped the Allies win the war. For President Truman the atomic bomb provided the perfect excuse to keep Russia and communism out of Western Europe and Asia. Truman impressed the Soviets with the bomb, telling them that the...

Find Another Essay On Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Was it Justified?

Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Necessary to save American lives

1900 words - 8 pages two ever used in wartime. The two bombings were in a three day span with Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. The Japanese then surrendered on August 15, 1945. The death count for both of the bombings were a large number, but it was necessary so that our nation would not come under Axis control. In Hiroshima, around 140,000 people were killed, not including deaths later on from the bomb's radiation. In Nagasaki, about 75,000

Hiroshima & Nagasaki: Justified? Essay

1669 words - 7 pages This attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is first ever use of a weapon of mass destruction. The target was an empire with its own secret weapon: the suicide bomber. On the 6th of August, 1945, a bomb unlike any other fell from the skies above Hiroshima. The bomb was designed by some of the world’s finest scientists. Using it was one of the most momentous political decisions ever made. The entire city of Hiroshima was annihilated in just a few

Was Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki Necessary to End World War 2?

1892 words - 8 pages that the United States when talking about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were for intentional purposes. The evidence clearly states that the bombing was unenviable. Many believe that after the incident happened or possibly during as well, that it was unnecessary and that the U.S. knew that Japan was simply weak at this point. Plus, Japan was running out of critical resources such as food, oil making armory and soldiers which were hard to

Discuss: "bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was an immoral act, a war crime against humanity."

673 words - 3 pages In August of 1945 nuclear weapons were released upon the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Soon after Japan surrended, consequently ending WWII. But was dropping the bomb justified, or an immoral act?After the attack of Pearl Harbour in December of 1941 American military started work on the Manhattan project in secret. During the time of the development of the bomb president Roosevelt died, President Truman succeeded him and continued

The United States was Justified in Dropping the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

970 words - 4 pages The United States was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki for many reasons. First of all, just to start out, the bombings had nothing to do with Japan, it was about the Cold War and the real reason America used these weapons was to show Russia that the US possessed them. Second, the war in the Pacific had been raging for almost four years. The two battles immediately preceding the bomb decision were Iwo Jima and

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Justified End to an Endless War

1090 words - 5 pages Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Justified End to an Endless War On December 7th, 1941 the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor by the Empire of Japan. This unprovoked assault on our nation’s soil forced Congress to take action with a formal declaration of war on Japan. With the country’s entry into World War II, a secret venture was implemented by the government. The clandestine project would employ some of the greatest scientific minds in

Was the atomic bombing on Nagasaki necessary?

1396 words - 6 pages Japanese didn't want to have a war against the U.S in the first place and as discussed above, if the first bomb dropped on Hiroshima was necessary to make Japan surrender, it was definitely unnecessary for the seconding bombing of Nagasaki. In my opinion, dropping the atomic bombs on two cities full of civilians is an act of genocide. The dropping of the two a-bombs was not only unnecessary, but it puts the US government in the same category as

Was the Second Bombing on Nagasaki Necessary? List three reasons why or why not. I Said it wasn't and then listed three reasons

844 words - 3 pages ambassador in Moscow to work on peace negotiations with the Allies. Japanese leaders had begun talking of surrender a year before this, and the Emperor himself had begun to suggest, in June 1945, that alternatives to fighting to the end be considered. Even though it was justified to use atomic power to put an end to the war, the second bomb on Nagasaki was unnecessary. It came only three days after the first bomb hit Hiroshima. This was not

What was the reason the U.S Dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima And Nagasaki? Find out some of the reasons why this happen and how it got started. DBQ

563 words - 2 pages Why Did the U.S Dropped the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?On August 6 and 9, 1945 the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by the first atomic bombs used in warfare. The United States decision to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima was strictly military measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post-Second-World-War era rather than a strictly diplomatic measure designed to force Japan's unconditional surrender. The

Morality of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

953 words - 4 pages civilians. Meaning that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary and immoral. The proposed alternate solution would have been useless because of the Japanese strong conviction and the fact that they were already used to being attacked with bombs since they were being attacked constantly in the Kanto area by air raids. Another reason why it was justified to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki was because they were legitimate military targets

Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

1224 words - 5 pages Hiroshima. Nagasaki. From the bombing of Pearl Harbor to D-day, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki will be a triumph for the US by nuclear achievements and ending a war, but a tragedy for the all of the innocent Japanese victims. I decided to research this topic because I was interested in what happened in World War Two and wanted to learn more about this special occurrence. I believe this topic is important in history because when we need

Similar Essays

Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

1153 words - 5 pages bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the the best possible way to end the war as soon as possible, with minimal cost of human lives.Bibliography1)Ambrose, E. Stephen, Americans at War (Jackson, The Berkeley Publishing Group, 1997).2)"Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?" "Rate it All" Douglas, "Was it Neccessary?"

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay

1903 words - 8 pages Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki In August of 1945, both of the only two nuclear bombs ever used in warfare were dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These two bombs shaped much of the world today. In 1941, The United States began an atomic bomb program called the “Manhattan Project.” The main objective of the “Manhattan Project” was to research and build an atomic bomb before Germany could create and use one against

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay

628 words - 3 pages decision. It is very unclear for the exact reasons behind using the bomb, even by reading his personal diary and researching articles. It was likely a combination of many reasons, obvious and unobvious ones. However, it is clear that his choice did save lives. Many Japanese lost their lives in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but an invasion of Japan would possibly have taken millions of Japanese and American lives.Work CitedQuote- "Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S Truman, 1945", pg. 212

The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

2090 words - 9 pages the twentieth century, Japan had become “one of the world’s leading economies.” After the war, reporters asked whether the decision to drop the two bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a “morally difficult [decision] to make.” Though many citizens of the U.S. were not happy. Citizens of the U.S had known about the bomb after the it was dropped on Hiroshima. Many citizens were flabbergasted. In Time magazine wrote that the U.S has “ become the new