Both Sides Of The Gun Control Issue Which Side Of The Barrel? The Right To Bear Arms.

976 words - 4 pages

Which Side of the Barrel?The right to bear arms in the 2nd Amendment has been debated before the ink on the Bill of Rights was dry. Both sides of the gun control issue have been passionate about their point of view. Both sides argue about what they feel are legitimate concerns about this controversial issue. A person who is still undecided on which side he should be on, will have his head spin while both sides spew out a myriad of facts and statistics to support their argument. From a Mother Jones article, writer Josh Sugarmann makes a compelling argument for gun control in this country, comparing guns to consumer products that need to be regulated. From the National Review, writer John Derbyshire uses recent examples why gun ownership helps to quell criminal activity. These two writers represent both liberal and conservative ideas that can be seen in the two dominate political parties in our country today.The Democrats in Congress have supported gun control for several decades. They pushed through the Brady Bill and claimed the bill has had an impact on the reduction of gun violence. If the Democrats had their way, all the guns owned by Americans would be taken away. Republicans, on the other hand believe that gun ownership is a right that the founding fathers wanted us to have to protect us from a tyrannical government or enemy invasion. The battle lines are clearly drawn, the Democrats and Republicans have both chosen their side of the battlefield, and to be undecided in this debate is just about impossible. Lets us see how the liberal and conservative points of view play out in the two articles.In Mother Jones magazine, Sugarmann chooses to classify guns as dangerous consumer products that should be regulated like other potentially dangerous consumer products such as pesticides and prescription drugs. He believes a Czar should be appointed to oversee the design and production of the gun industry in the same manner in which the FDA now regulates prescription drugs. We know that for a drug to be approved for consumer consumption it can take anywhere from three to four years, sometimes longer. If a gun Czar were to oversee the gun industry it would have a tremendous impact on it. The economic toll that gun violence has in America according to Sugarmann is staggering, $14.4 billion in 1985 for hospital, rehabilitation, and lost wages. He asks why other consumer products such as lawn darts and the Dalkon shield, which have been banned for a miniscule number of deaths, while guns were involved in 15,377 murders in 1990, according to the FBI, are still on the market. Sugarmann states "that gun violence is not a crime issue but a public health...

Find Another Essay On Both sides of the gun control issue -Which Side of the Barrel? The right to bear arms.

The Right To Bear Arms Essay

1073 words - 5 pages Your life is at stake here, would you prefer to have a gun in your hand or the police on the phone? Which is more promising? I believe that law-abiding citizens should be allowed to bear arms for the sake of their life. People should be allowed to own guns because it is a tool of protection from outlaws, tyranny of government, and it decreases the rate of crimes committed. Some may say that owning a gun is a crime itself, and that it will lead

The Right to Bear Arms Essay

1435 words - 6 pages availability of weapons for criminals. And thus, the debate over the right to bear arms continues, again. Gun ownership is a hot topic in this country. The United States has almost always been a country know for its’ lenient gun laws. “Gun Ownership is a civil liberty protected by the Second Amendment of The Constitution” (Roth 1). The Constitution says that we can “bear arms”, which in turn, makes it very complicated to make a simple change/addition of

The Right to Bear Arms

2044 words - 9 pages statement, you will see that “a well-regulated” means firmly controlled, or held to high standards. A militia is a group militant citizens. Next, the phrase “being necessary to the security of a free State,” means we have permission defend our rights to being a free country. Following, we have “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed,” which explains our entitlement to acquire firearms. Secondly, guns are used for more

The Bill of Rights and the Right to Bear Arms

1244 words - 5 pages Firearms Act and other gun control laws that were created to mitigate violence? However, the most important question is would there be more or less crimes in the world if this amendment had not been written? The second amendment does give an individual the right to bear arms. Amendment two states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” However

Analysis of "The Right to Bear Arms" by Jim Williams

1078 words - 4 pages Article: 'Bible offers remedy for nation's reaping what it has sowed', Rev. Jim Williams. Orlando Sentinel Tribune, Section: Osceola SentinelResearching the issue of the right to bear arms was somewhat difficult at first because I really did not know what to focus on. I did find this article, though, and it really interested me because of the different perspective it took on the issue. The article starts off with a quote from the Bible, so the

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms

1677 words - 7 pages bear arms has been a topic of extreme controversy in this century and can be argued equally from both sides. The first side says that it is our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. On the flip side, it is too dangerous and would increase the number of violent crimes. No matter which side is right, there has to be a middleman to regulate the extent of "the right to bear arms". Up to the 1900's people didn't even second-guess this

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1292 words - 6 pages of these gun-owners, the majority who are concerned about self-protection, 79% say guns make them feel safer. From the polls, we see that security is a serious issue, one whose answer lies in carrying guns as a form of protection, a right of the people given by the 2nd Amendment. If we take away this right, the unarmed people will not be as able to protect themselves against an armed criminal. Both those for and against carrying concealed

Keeping the Right to Bear Arms Alive

1731 words - 7 pages creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations. (Barack Obama)." The president disagreed with a law our founding fathers created. It says in The 2nd Amendment; ” A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Why would we as Americans throw away what our founding fathers fought so hard for us to

The Security of a Free State: This essay points out some of the major flaws in the argument for strict gun control and argues for the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms

1081 words - 4 pages The possession and use of firearms is a source of much debate in the United States. Some people favor stringent gun control laws, while others are staunch supporters of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Both sides of the issue have many voters in agreement with them. For example, the "Million Mom March" is an organization (which incidentally, has only about 750,000 members) that supports stricter gun laws, believing that will make

The Meaning of the Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

1234 words - 5 pages “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(understand) comes from the United States constitution. It has for the last decade or so been a topic of an ongoing debate between the people of this nation. It all depends on how you interpret the 27 words. Most people believe that it gives United States citizens the right to bear arms. The

The Right to Bear Arms is a Human Right

760 words - 4 pages Michael Bross 28 May 2014 American Government John Burton Dangerous Freedom or Peaceful Slavery? “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the securing of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Those are the words of the seconds amendment to the Constitution of the United States. These words were written by the man who laid the foundation of our government today. As a constitutional right our

Similar Essays

The Right To Bear Arms Essay

1397 words - 6 pages equally with assault weapons. Such a measure is in the interests of the arms manufacturers, but there is additional burden on the federal budget. Even within the ruling Democratic Party, there is no unity on the Gun Control issue. Millions of ordinary Americans consider the right to possess weapons to be their sacred Constitutional right. Today, supporters and opponents of Gun Control are in conflict. Both sides have same goal - reducing the number

The Right To Bear Arms Essay

2039 words - 8 pages including both gun activists and people who don’t own gun to reach a common goal.” In my opinion, I am genuinely encouraging the government to enact the law that could give the safety and wellbeing to the citizens especially for the children. Yes, I am totally agreed that the ancestors of the Americas had to bear arms to survive and to battle with the England, the Native Americans, French and the Spanish. Moreover, there were various kinds of

The Right To Bear Arms Essay 565 Words

565 words - 2 pages After our Constitution was ratified in 1789 some congressmen were still unhappy. They demanded that some changes or "amendments" needed to be made. These changes were listed in what became the Bill of Rights. An issue that the early Americans found very relevant and important at this time was the right to bear arms. As a result they ratified the second amendment to our constitution which reads "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the

The Right To Bear Arms Essay 1575 Words

1575 words - 7 pages In 1791 the United States government added the second amendment to the constitution. As stated in the Constitution, this amendment states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. In the early years of the United States it was common for people to walk around with their rifles or revolvers. Nobody really gave a second look or glared at them like they were doing something wrong. Openly carrying a firearm was