This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Bowers V Hardwick Supreme Court Case

1028 words - 4 pages

Bowers v. Hardwick
United States Supreme Court Opinion

This case, Bowers v. Hardwick, originated when Michael Hardwick was targeted by a policer officer for harassment in Georgia. A houseguest of Hardwick's let the officer into his home, where Hardwick was found engaging in oral sex with his partner, who was another male. Michael Hardwick was arrested and charged of sodomy. After charges were later dropped, Hardwick brought his case to the Supreme Court to have the sodomy law declared unconstitutional.
Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court. Justice Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, and O'Conner joined, filing concurring opinions. In Justice White's opinion, or while delivering it, he mentioned a lot of steps that were taken by Michael Hardwick to have his case at the Supreme Court. Justice White also mentioned and compared past court cases that might had relevance or helped make his opinion more valid. The key issue that was focused on by Justice White was whether or not the Federal Constitution grants a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy. There were still laws in many states that made sodomy illegal, and have been in place for a very long time.
When making his way to presenting his opinion of the Supreme Court, Justice White went through prior cases such as Loving v. Virginia, Roe v. Wade, Eisenstadt v. Baird, and many more; because the Court of Appeals and Hardwick claimed that these cases construed the Constitution to grant a right of privacy that stretch forth to homosexual sodomy. After reviewing prior cases and accepting the decisions in those cases, Justice White thought none of the rights announced in the previous cases bears any relevance or relation to Hardwick's claim that it is a constitutional right of homosexuals to engage in acts of sodomy. Due to sodomy being a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the first 13 states when they approved the Bill of Rights, Justice White found it impossible to grant a fundamental right to homosexuals to engage in acts of consensual sodomy. Hardwick relied on Stanley v. Georgia to affirm that the result should be different where homosexual conduct occurs in the privacy of the home. Since Stanley v. Georgia had support from the first amendment Hardwick thought he had another claim. However, as seen by Justice White, illegal conduct is not always immunized when it happens inside the home. For example, possession and use of illegal drugs, do not escape the law when committed at home. Since Justice White was unpersuaded that the sodomy laws of the states should be invalidated based on the claims and he did not agree, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Chief Justice Burger and Justice Powell also shared the same opinion, as Justice White read the opinion of the Court. Chief Justice Burger's view was that there is no such thing as a fundamental right to commit homosexual sodomy in constitutional terms. Although Chief Justice...

Find Another Essay On Bowers V Hardwick Supreme Court Case

Supreme Court Case: Engel v. Vitale Analysis

1305 words - 5 pages all men and women of good will, and [they] call upon all of them to aid in giving life to [the] program" ("Supreme Court Collection").D. The court case of Engel v. Vitale originated in the state of New York, and was brought to the attention of a New York State Court by the malcontented parents of their children enrolled in the public school system. Reasoning behind the case being sustained within the state of New York rests as it was the place of

Jaffree v. Wallace Supreme Court Case: Analysis

3419 words - 14 pages receiving the decision of the District Court, Jaffree then appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The Court of Appeals agreed with the decision that there was nothing unconstitutional about statute 16-2-20, but they disagreed with the decision made about statutes 16-2-20.2 and 16-2-20.2, citing that the previous Supreme Court decision Engle v. Vitale, which had decided that state laws for teacher lead

The Supreme Court case of Reno v. ACLU

549 words - 2 pages The Supreme Court case of Reno vs. ACLU was a pivotal case in American History. It took place in 1996, and was the Supreme Court's first case dealing with the issue of cyberspace. The case involves the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), which makes it against the law for minors to view "obscene or indecent" messages or images on the Internet.1 When the president signed the bill, the American Civil Liberties Union (the ACLU) filed a suit

The Supreme Court Vs. Salazar V. Buono Case

1103 words - 4 pages The Supreme Court was faced with a unique paradox during the case Salazar V. Buono; in which their ruling had to coincide with the establishment clause in the first amendment, while avoiding the dissenting opinions of thousands of veterans and their families they threatened to insult with their decision. In 1934, the VFW commissioned a white cross to be constructed on an outcropping known as Sunrise Rock in the Mojave National Preserve. In 1999

AP US History Paper on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court Case

1253 words - 5 pages Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court CaseThe Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court case in 1954 revolved around the issue of equality between black and white children in segregated schools. It was the result of a long-standing legal campaign carried on by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), to resolve the effects of Jim Crow laws

This is an overview of the landmark Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court case in 1962 regarding religion in school

895 words - 4 pages Engel v. Vitale is a landmark 1962 United States Supreme Court case which declared the inclusion of state-sponsored school prayer, even when non-denominational and voluntary, unconstitutional. This case was sparked by the adoption of a school prayer which underwent extreme scrutiny and deliberations questioning whether the First Amendment prohibits laws respecting an establishment of religion or its free exercise. This case has been monumental

United States Supreme Court in the Case of McCarve v. North Carolina in Accordance with the Eight Amendment

1296 words - 6 pages Does the motion filed in 2001 by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of McCarver v. North Carolina address the concerns of the Eighth Amendment? Does it properly demonstrate that the execution of mentally retarded individual who has been convicted of capital crime is a direct violation of this amendment? Does the motion filed in 2001 by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of McCarver v. North Carolina address the concerns of the Eighth Amendment

U.S. Supreme Court Graham v. Connor 490 U.S. 386 (1989)

822 words - 4 pages Fourth Amendment’s objective reasonableness test. In the case, U.S. Supreme Court Graham v. Connor, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution was applied. It seems that before, the standard for judging unreasonable force, or actionable force, was just whether the officer used that force out of deliberate cruelty, or whether he really meant to protect public safety. The conclusion of the Supreme Court was that this is not a good enough measure. Just because he had good intentions does not mean that the force, search, and seizure were not reasonable and that the person's rights were not violated.

The Lawrence v Texas Supreme Court Ruling on Same-sex Activities

671 words - 3 pages . Texas). Due Process and Liberty Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment protected the men’s privacy. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of Lawrence and Garner, testifying that the State of Texas had no “right to prohibit any sexual conduct between consenting adults” (Olson). Lawrence v. Texas is extremely controversial now because it poses the idea that the government should uphold the same standard for same sex marriages and other same sex acts and

Supreme Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. M.T., Plaintiff V. J.T., Defendant

784 words - 3 pages later deserted the plaintiff and failed to support her. It was the opinion of the court that if the choice is medically sound, not a whim, and irreversible surgery has been performed, "society has no right to prohibit the transsexual from leading a normal life." (M.T. v J.T.)An English case, Corbett v. Corbett, 1970, involved the validity of marriage of a post operative transsexual and a male. The court in that case held that the biological

The Supreme Court and its effects on the balance of power between federal and state. (McCullogh v Maryland, Lochner v NY, Nebbia v NY) The role of Supreme Court in relation to federalism

2020 words - 8 pages the status quo, whereas their decision would keep the majority content. In this scenario, the people [Lochner] wanted the right to contract and decide their own economic trend. This was a time of rapid economic change, and the people wanted security. As a result, the Supreme Court voted towards the trend of the majority, so that they may feel economically secure the way they wanted. The last case one needs to understand is that of Nebbia v

Similar Essays

Court Case Number 15: Bowers V. Hardwick (June 30, 1986)

561 words - 2 pages Court Case Number 15: Bowers v. Hardwick (June 30, 1986)In August of 1982, Michael Hardwick was charged with violating the Georgia statute criminalizing sodomy by committing that act with another adult male in the bedroom of Hardwick's home. Hardwick then brought suit in the Federal District Court, therefore challenging the constitutionality of the statute as it criminalized sodomy. Hardwick asserted that he was a practicing homosexual, that the

Bowers V. Hardwick (1986) Essay

924 words - 4 pages Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) In Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), the Supreme Court abandoned its previous doctrine for ruling upon an individual’s right to privacy. Written by Justice White, the opinion of the Court in this case focused on the morality of sodomy, particularly sodomy between homosexuals, rather than the constitutional question of privacy. The Court made substantial progress in defining the right to privacy in the preceding years

Kansas V. Cheever Supreme Court Case

898 words - 4 pages into jury selection, Cheever’s defense attorney became unable to proceed and the case was dismissed. In the meantime, the United States Supreme Court had reinstated the Kansas death penalty in Kansas v. Marsh, so the case was re-filed in Kansas state court. In October 2007, during Cheever’s state trial, he introduced his own expert, Dr. Evans, a psychiatric pharmacy specialist, he testified that over time, drug abuse inhibits brain functions

Supreme Court Case: Tinker V. Des Moines

823 words - 4 pages Many Supreme Court cases in the United States have reassured its citizens’ rights. One of those cases was that of the 1965 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case. This case was about five students who were suspended from school for wearing black armbands. Should the students have been suspended? The Tinker v. Des Moines case was a very controversial Supreme Court case in which the right to freedom of speech and