This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Bowman Vs. Fels Court Case Comments

1090 words - 5 pages

Bowman v Fels [2005] EWCA Civ 226, [2005] 1 WLR 3083

It has been stated that “a person commits an offence if he enters into or becomes concerned in an arrangement which he knows or suspects facilitates (by whatever means) the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person.” In Bowman v Fels, the courts concluded that this section of the act was not interpreted in a way by which it intended to cover or affect the ordinary conduct of litigation by legal professionals, which was the issue that arose here.

The facts of the case are somewhat straightforward. Jennifer Mary Bowman, the claimant, lived with the defendant, William John Fels, over a span of ten years between the period of May 1993 and April 2003. The premise they were residing in was registered in the defendant’s sole name. After the relationship between the claimant and the defendant ended, the claimant asserted a right to a beneficial interest in the said property they had jointly occupied. The claimant held that she rightly had an authority over the house as before it was purchased, the defendant had expressly agreed to share the purchase of the premise with her. This argument was brought before the House after the defendant had gone back on his word, to which legal proceedings started.

In preparing for the trial, Bowman’s solicitors had suspicions that Fels had wrongly included certain expenses to be business costs in his accounts as well as VAT returns carried out at the premises. Bowman’s solicitors notified the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) of this by their assumed obligation under section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, but consequently had to seek to delay the trial as the consent required from the NCIS to allow them to proceed with the litigation would not be ready in time. They did not, during that period, inform Fels’ solicitors of the reasons of seeking an adjournment.

His Honour Judge Cowell found that Bowman’s solicitors were in the wrong for doing so. It was said that they should have rightfully explained to Fels' solicitors the reason by which they were seeking for an adjournment. Furthermore, their adamancy of refusing to prepare for trial whilst awaiting permission from NCIS was uncalled for. This is where we can begin to identify and analyse the various legal issues brought up here.

It has not been properly determined whether or not family lawyers can be found guilty for having committed the offences created by the section or whether charges brought against them for criminal liability would be deemed unsuccessful by virtue of the Act’s incompatibility with the privilege(s) given to the legal profession as well as the Human Rights Act 1998.

An issue to be determined here is whether or not section 328 objectively implied that a lawyer acting for a client in legal proceedings who discovers or suspects anything that may help or facilitate the proceeding should immediately...

Find Another Essay On Bowman vs. Fels Court Case Comments

The Supreme Court Vs. Salazar V. Buono Case

1103 words - 4 pages The Supreme Court was faced with a unique paradox during the case Salazar V. Buono; in which their ruling had to coincide with the establishment clause in the first amendment, while avoiding the dissenting opinions of thousands of veterans and their families they threatened to insult with their decision. In 1934, the VFW commissioned a white cross to be constructed on an outcropping known as Sunrise Rock in the Mojave National Preserve. In 1999

Religious Freedom: Supreme Court Case Oregon Vs Smith

2155 words - 9 pages .804)In 1987 the state of Oregon appealed the states supreme court decision to the U.S Supreme Court, arguing that its criminal laws against the consumption of Peyote were relevant to the states interest in denying compensation benefits and Smith and Black's first amendment claims. The U.S Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Oregon Supreme Court because the court did not rule on whether the use of peyote for sacramental use was allowed

Supreme Court Case Analysis American Express Company, et al. vs. Italian Color

1311 words - 6 pages ruled in favor of American Express and dismissed the case. Italian Colors appealed the decision of the district court. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court. It holded that the plaintiffs showed enough proofs “that arbitration would not allow it to effectively vindicate its antitrust claim” (Legal Information Institute).A long procedural intermezzo ensued: When American Express first sought certiorari, the

Nixon vs. The United States of America. Explains all aspects of the case and the reasons why the Supreme court decided as they did

714 words - 3 pages In this case, the court is asked to decide if the president had knowledgeinvolvement in the Watergate robberies and if he had the right to invoke Executive Privilege.FactsDuring the campaign of President Nixon's second term, a group of burglars working for the committee to re-elect the President broke into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate office-apartment complex in Washington DC, apparently in search of

Quota Hiring Case Study

911 words - 4 pages The merit system standards case is based on Congressman Wally Herger’s comments regarding the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) civil rights program (Reeves, 2006). In an attempt to persuade the House of Representatives that change was necessary, Herger quoted several United States Forest Service job announcements that included language such as “only unqualified applicants may apply” and “only applicants who do not meet Office of

NYPD Whistleblower Retaliation – Detective Labeled A Rat

788 words - 4 pages individually. This case study will analyze the incident, whistleblower laws and the ethical challenges involved. While Griffin does not reveal information that endangers public health or safety, he does disclose illegal and inefficient activities within his own organization. Bowman states the ideal case for a whistleblower to reveal such information would be when the cause is just and where all administrative appeals have been exhausted (Bowman, 1980). In

Miranda v. Arizona

1293 words - 6 pages court would not use the confession that he made without being informed of his rights. Although this was important, it did not mean that Miranda was let go. During the retrial, the Supreme Court addressed whether or not people arrested should know their rights already, or if they have to be told their rights. Justice Earl Warren made many comments on this point. First, Warren explained that there are subtle ways to make people being interrogated

Sexual Harassment is No Joke

1060 words - 4 pages harmful. An example is Harris vs. Forklift System Inc., in this case Teresa Harris charges her manager Charles Hardy with sexual harassment in the form of dirty jokes and obscene comments. The Supreme Court as well as other lower courts rejected her claim because there was no mental damage done (Jones 19). The severity of harassment should not matter. The point is that a woman felt assaulted by her employer's crude jokes and nothing was brought

Nationalism After the War of 1812 and Important Court Cases of the Time

565 words - 2 pages case was the famous Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which established the right of the court to declare the actions of local, state or federal governments invalid if they violate the Constitution. This process of declaring actions void was called Judicial Review and it made the Court equally as powerful as the legislative and executive branches of government. Another important case was Martin vs. Hunter's Lessee in 1816. The ruling by Marshall declared

Rocky Mountain Fitness Center

1059 words - 4 pages ). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 8Writing Persuasive Messages, Bowman, J.P Beason, Ethos and Error: How Business People React to ErrorsCollege Composition and Communication. September 2001. V. 53(1), 33-64.Rocky Mountain Mutual, TUI, BUS303 module 2, case,

Judicial Process of the Supreme Court

1167 words - 5 pages Supreme Court. For instance, Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954 was one of the most controversial cases that the Supreme Court had to resolve; it violated the Equal Protection clause of the fourteenth Amendment. The case that violated an individual right was the case of Gideon vs. Wainwright in 1963, which violated the Sixth Amendment in a criminal case for the defendant. The case of Miranda vs. Arizona in 1966 is another

Similar Essays

Attorney Client Privilege In The Bowman V. Fels Case

1583 words - 7 pages Introduction The concept of attorney – client privilege has been a long withstanding foundation of the English legal system. It is arguably among the basic principles of justice. This is why when this doctrine is under threat we must pay close attention. Such was the case in Bowman v Fels, where the entire principal was possibly under major reform. The discussion of this paper will critically analyze the decision reached in this case, and the

U.S Vs. Microsoft Court Case Essay

853 words - 3 pages U.S vs. MicrosoftThe current pending case against Microsoft involves the U.S department of Justice anti-trust Division and Attorney generals from 19 U.S states. The topic of the case is whether or not Microsoft has violated and Anti-Trust laws by using its monopoly in the Windows operating system to eliminate competition and harm consumers. By creating higher prices and downgrading software quality they Federal government has stated that

The Supreme Court Case Of Roe Vs. Wade

1819 words - 7 pages The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade In 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Roe V. Wade. Jane Roe was a single mother trying to raise one child on a limited income. She was living in Dallas Texas when she became pregnant with another child. There were no medical issues that would have prevented her from carrying this child to full term. The lack of income and already having a child was her deciding factor. In

How The Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Spurred The Supreme Court To Specifically Outline The Necessary Aspects Of Police Warnings To Suspects

1215 words - 5 pages believe in the American constitution, and it's main purpose to preserve the rights and the liberties of the people of the United States. Subsequent appointments of several new members in recent years, has produced a Supreme Court decidedly more cautious in protecting the rights of accused persons.In conclusion, the Miranda versus Arizona case made a significant difference in the police and court system in the United States. The case of Miranda vs