This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Uk's Constitution: The Rule Of Law And Parliamentary Sovereignty

2184 words - 9 pages

Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the operation of the legal system and the manner in which the powers of the state are exercised. However, since the Parliament is capable of making any law whatsoever, the concept of the rule of law poses a contradiction to the principle of parliamentary supremacy, entailing that Parliament is not bound by the Rule of Law, and it can exercise power arbitrarily.

The case of Jackson v Attorney General scrutinised the relationship between the rule of law and parliamentary sovereignty in a fresh manner, suggesting that there were restrictions to sovereignty where constitutional fundamentals were at risk . The courts were asked to examine whether the Hunting Act 2004 and Parliament Act 1949 were legal Acts of Parliament, on procedural grounds. It was argued that they did not comply with the legislative requirements mentioned in the Parliament Act 1911, and hence were invalid. Under the Act, it was an offence to hunt wild mammals with dogs except within limited conditions. The Bill was passed using a process under the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, without the approval of the House of Lords.

Refusing to make the declaration, the House of Lords upheld that the 1949 Act has been sanctioned validly using the 1911 Act, and that the Hunting Act had been approved using the modified process. It was affirmed that the courts cannot challenge the validity of primary legislation, regardless of how an Act has been passed. However, it was not an Act of the sovereign Parliament, only the outcome of a process authorised by a sovereign Parliament in the past . The reasoning behind it is that the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 aided the Crown and the House of Commons to pass laws as primary legislation, but they expressly implemented limitations at the same time, particularly excluding the right to elongate the Parliament’s lifetime.

The crucial issue may be deemed as a matter of legislative interpretation, specifically, in terms of the significance of the Parliament Act of 1911. The judges have used at least five approaches by while interpreting section 2(1) of the 1911 Act. However, Jackson discussed a broad range of matters associated with Parliamentary sovereignty, which makes it remarkable. The case raised issues of supremacy in practice, as Lord Hope stated, 'the English principle of the absolute legislative sovereignty of being qualified' . This examination of the wider issues indicates that, a deviation from orthodox opinions on the principles of the UK's constitutional mandate may be gaining support in...

Find Another Essay On UK's Constitution: The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty

Parliamentary Sovereignty and Jackson v. Attorney General

2915 words - 12 pages . The ideology of parliamentary sovereignty represents a constitutional order that acknowledges the necessary power of government, while placing legal limits and conditions upon its excise due to the Rule of Law, developed by the judiciary in cases such as Pickin v British Railways Board [1974] AC 765. The Diceyan theory represents a definition of parliamentary sovereignty. A general summary recalls that, Jackson raised the sovereignty head that

The Rule of Law Essay

714 words - 3 pages the difficulty of resolving the operation of constitutional conventions and the compatibility of parliamentary sovereignty with the rule of law. Dicey believed in the rule of law and the use of conventions as essential mechanisms against abuse, especially of discretionary power. Conventions recognised public “morality” which self-limited the power of Parliament. In the absence of any formal doctrine of separation of

The Rule of Law

1289 words - 5 pages The Rule of Law The Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1688 were attempts made by people of the time to enforce the rule of law in Britain. The rule of law is a set of values or principles that are the cornerstone of our legal system. These principles are known or readily discoverable and therefore do not change without

The Rule of Law

1375 words - 6 pages concept of the rule of law has been recognised since at least the 4th century BC when Aristotle expressed the view that the rule of law was preferable to that of any individual. His view was that those in power should be subject to some sort of 'higher' law and should govern in accordance with that law. Writing in the Victorian era Professor A V Dicey in his work The Law of the Constitution stated that the rule of law

Assess the impact that Britain's union with Europe has had on the Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty

2220 words - 9 pages The United Kingdom became a member of the EC in 1972 when it enacted the European Communities Act (1972). This has has undermined English Domestic legislation and the Supremacy of the Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty. In particular s.2(1) of the Act brings European law firmly within our domestic law and such law is to ' be enforced, allowed and followed accordingly'. s.2(4) of the Act required English Statute law ' to be construed

The UK Constitution and Its Effect on the UK's Actions in Syria

2004 words - 8 pages protected by what is known as parliamentary sovereignty and privilege. Consequently the separation of powers emphasises that parliament has no right should they instruct the judges on how to either interpret legislatures or how to apply it in courts just as the judges have no power in instructing the MP’s on we on hat law they should make and not make. The separation of powers enables close surveillance on those who have been given power to

Maintaining the Rule of Law

965 words - 4 pages The judicial court system aims to achieve justice by upholding the ‘rule of law’, in which everyone is ‘subject to the law and can rely on the law to set the bounds within which other people and governments can operate.’ However, the rule of law does not always work to prevent all injustice, and lawyers should be actively involved in developing and maintaining the rule of law to establish a civil society which can be the foundation of justice

The Meaning and Constitutional Significance of the Rule of Law

2130 words - 9 pages classes to the ordinary law of the land administered by the ordinary law courts. In this sense rule of law conveys that no man is above the law; that officials like private citizens are under a duty to obey the same laws, and there can be no Special court or administrative tribunal for the state officials. Finally - Constitution is the result of the ordinary law of the land "There is no need for a bill of rights because

Seperation of Powers and the Rule of Law

1139 words - 5 pages ‘…If you maltreat a penguin in the London Zoo, you do not escape prosecution because you are the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.’ The rule of law broadly requires; that all are equal before the law , that the government is subject to the law and must exercise its power according to the law, finally that ‘there exist fundamental individual liberties and minimum standards of justice, to which the law must conform’ . The rule of law is problematic

Absolutism and Parliamentary Rule in England

1045 words - 4 pages For a period in time, the Catholic Church held the “divine right of kings” to be all important, to be paramount. To the Catholic Church, it is a doctrine that states royal and political legitimacy. A divine right of kings affirms that a monarch is subject to absolutely no earthly authority. God had given the power and authority to a king in order that he may rule. In doing this, it consequentially gave the king the right to rule directly from

Malaysia: Rule of Law and Independence of the Judiciary

6151 words - 25 pages of 1988, which will be discussed in section 4, including the amendment to Article 121 of the Constitution removing the judicial power from the courts, undermined the doctrine of separation of powers, which is the foundation of a democracy under the rule of law. It left a chilling effect on the entire justice system. Several judicial appointments and leapfrog promotions under the previous administration of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad were

Similar Essays

The Extent To Which The Human Rights Act Of 1998 Strengthened The Rule Of Law In The U.K. Constitution

3695 words - 15 pages produced by Parliament, is generally regarded as the highest form of law within the British constitutional structure. The British Parliament, it is said, is a sovereign lawmaker. This conception of the constitution is based largely around the Diceyan theory on parliamentary sovereignty. It is a layered theory that involves both negative and positive limbs. The positive limb asserts that it is Parliament, and it alone

Parliament And Parliamentary Sovereignty Essay

1808 words - 7 pages . The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is about the relationship between those who create the Acts (Parliament) and those who must apply them (courts). When Dicey published The Law of the Constitution in 1885 he identified parliamentary sovereignty as meaning that, 'Parliament has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognized by the

Constitutional Monarchy And Parliamentary Sovereignty Essay

997 words - 4 pages . There is a resounding question, as to whether or not the Constitution is fully serving its citizens today, and whether the American government could use another paradigm shift towards Parliamentary rule. Dylan Matthews, a writer for the Washington Post, published an article that argues against the validity of the Constitution by its impacts of today’s society (10/2/13). He juxtaposes the historical culture with today’s culture, and argues that

Have The Courts Struck A Balance Between The Protection Of Individual Rights Under The Human Rights Act And Parliamentary Sovereignty?

2052 words - 8 pages Convention. However, the courts have no power to legislate themselves, and s.3 (2) goes on to state that this power does not affect the validity of legislation. Therefore, a measure of Parliamentary sovereignty is retained.In approaching their duty under s.3, the courts have taken a three stage approach. First, the statute is scrutinized in order to determine whether it is compatible with Convention rights. If it is, then s.3 (1) is not triggered