Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1999. Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Saxenian’s main claim is contributions made by immigrants have altered the relationship between trade, investment, and economic development for the better. Her grounds for this are how immigrant entrepreneurs have generated new jobs in the United States, increased wealth for the state, and built connections to their place of origin. She “relies on three primary sources: (1) Data on immigrants’ education, occupations, and earnings . . .; (2) the analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship is based on a customized Dun & Bradstreet database of 11,443 high-technology firms . . .; and (3) the balance of the findings reported in the study are based on more than 100 in-depth interviews with engineers, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and other key actors in the Silicon Valley and San Francisco” (Saxenian). By using data and first hand interviews, Saxenian is better able to show the affects immigrant entrepreneurs have on trade and economic development by looking at their education and revenue. She warrants that many people within the United States constitute the low labor cost as the only relevant contribution. Furthermore, those, from where the immigrants migrated, see emigration to the United States as a “’brain drain,’ which deprives their economies of their best and brightest” (Saxenian). Saxenian’s hope, along with mine, is to navigate thinkers like these to see the benefits of immigration.
“AnnaLee Saxenian is a professor of regional development in the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of California, Berkeley. She is internationally recognized for her research on technology regions in the United States and Europe. She holds a B.A. in economics from Williams College, an M.C.P. in city and regional planning from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Ph.D. in political science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology” (Saxenian). Saxenian’s credentials provide her with credibility. She is very prestigious and has clearly done her research in order to provide a highly credible secondary source by analysis of primary sources. Though Saxenians argument is revolved around Chinese and Indian emigrants, I can still use this source as a way of demonstrating the benefits of immigration. By showing the benefits, I’ll be able to create a better argument of why the United States should accept emigrants because hopefully emigrants won’t be seen as a threat but rather partners. Therefore, establishing a greater sense of community. However, communities need to be prepared for immigration in order to prevent hostility just like Jones-Correa argues.
Scott, Robert E. "The high price of ‘free’ trade." Economic Policy Institute. Economic Policy Institute, 17 Nov. 2003. Web. 14 Jan. 2014. .
Scott’s main claim is that NAFTA was created with poor...