This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Burden Of Proof Essay

4597 words - 18 pages

INTRODUCTIONEvery story has its own contents, which is the combination of various facts. Every person has to establish facts that go in his favor or against his opponent. The burden of proof (onus) means the obligation to prove a fact. As per onus probandi, the burden of proof lies upon the party who would fail upon the party who would fail if no evidence were given at all. The general principle is that the party who wish to establish the truth of certain facts must also prove them. In other words the party, who moved to the court, must prove all facts necessary for the purpose.The burden of proof is the obligation on a party to establish the facts in issue in a case to the required degree of certainty (the standard of proof) in order to prove their case.Nature of the burden of proof (onus)Once the burden of introducing is discharged to the satisfaction of the court, then the burden is shifted to the opposite party to show as to why legal action should not be taken against him. Thus, the burden of proof in the first instance, which lies on the first party, may be shifted to the other side, by proving contradiction, or facts in his favor. To conclude, it may be said that the burden of proof is an obligation of shifting nature and during trial of the case it shifts frequently. The amount of evidence required to shift upon a party, the burden displacing a party, may depend on the circumstances of each case. A presumption is not in itself evidence but only makes a prima facie case for party whose favour it exits.Burden of proof- burden of proof is the obligation to prove a fact.It is party's duty to prove a disputed assertion or charge. The burden of proof includes both burden persuasion and production termed as onus probandi. Burden of proof denotes the duty of establishing by a fair preponderance of the evidence, the truth of the operative facts upon which the issue at hand is made to turn to a substantive law.BURDEN OF PROOF- ONUS PROBANDI-Burden of Proof lies on the party who would fail if no evidence is given at all.The general principle is that the party who moved the court must prove all the facts necessary for the purpose.The burden of proof lies on the plaintiff to establish the Prima- Facie case. Once the burden of introducing is discharged to the satisfaction of the court, then the burden is shifted to the opposite party to show as to why legal action should not be taken against him.Burden of proof is an obligation of shifting nature and during the trial of the case it shifts frequently. The amount of evidence that is required to shift upon a person the burden of displaying a fact may depend on the circumstances of the case.Standard of proofThe degree or level of proof demanded in a specific case, such as "beyond a reasonable doubt" or "by a preponderance of evidence".LEGAL BURDEN OF PROOF - CIVIL CASESThe general rule is that "he who asserts must prove", i.e., the burden rests with the plaintiff (the party bringing the action).The...

Find Another Essay On Burden Of Proof

The Golden Tread Speech by Viscount Sankey: Legal Burden

3198 words - 13 pages only need to raise a defense on a burden that is merely evidential. A legal burden is one where there is an obligation to prove, which is a heavy responsibility and would generally reside on the prosecution. A judge would direct a jury as to the burden of proof and failing so or giving an incorrect direction would result in a quashed conviction. An evidential burden on the other hand is a much lighter burden, where it requires the accused to

Native American Inmates in the Alabama Department of Corrections: Knight v. Thompson

1758 words - 8 pages strict proof requirement and held that in order to meet the RLUIPA’s least restrictive means burden, prison officials are not required to show that they considered other less restrictive alternatives before adopting the policy in question. The issue of whether the RLUIPA requires prison officials to consider less restrictive alternatives has been addressed by other circuits. In Warsoldier v. Woodford, eight years prior to the Knight case, the

Driving Force Behind European Imperialism in Africa

901 words - 4 pages could supply, the European desire for power, and the European's reaction to the White Man's burden, they took control of almost every square mile in Africa through imperialization. One of the main reasons Europeans colonized Africa was for their useful resources. There are countless assets in the African landscape that were wanted by other nations. The European countries had access to some of the worlds most needed resources such as cotton

Chapter 11 in Law 12 textbook

1550 words - 6 pages action.The key elements that must be proven are duty of care, standard of care, forseeability, reasonable person, causation, actual loss and burden of proof.3. Why was the Donoghue v. Stevenson case judgment so important for today's consumers?It was established that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the buyer of a product and to most other persons who might be harmed as a result of that manufacturers negligence. It gave rise to

Chronic Kidney Disease

679 words - 3 pages to grow despite the numerous measures that have been put in place to control it. Secondly, CKD is unfairly contracted as various segments of a given population are known to be unequally affected (Couser, Remuzzi, Mendis, & Tonelli, 2011). Thirdly, there is sufficient proof that effective preventive measures could greatly reduce the burden caused by the health problem. However, the proposed preventive measures are still in process and not yet

Should the Defense Have to Prove Direct Threat of Harm?

2300 words - 10 pages I. INTRODUCTION The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and judicial expansion of the direct threat of harm to self or others defense has strengthened the employee’s position under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by applying ration standards to this defense. If an employer has false assumptions about a prospective employee’s capabilities because of his/her disability, then the employer should have the burden of proving why

COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAW

1156 words - 5 pages a civil law is broken, legal action is brought by an individual against another for some form of legal remedy, e.g. damages. In civil suits, the party initiating legal proceedings is referred to as the plaintiff and the party being sued is called the defendant. For a plaintiff to successfully seek damages from the defendant he or she needs to prove their case, this is called the burden of proof. The amount of proof required by the law is called

Automatism, Insanity and Diminished Responsibility

1823 words - 7 pages and would not protect those who killed who did not meet the M’Naghten Rules. In relation to the burden of proof when raising a defence, insanity can be raised by either the defence or prosecution. When the defence raises it, they bear the burden of proof on balance of probabilities. When the prosecution raises it, they bear the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. , Unlike insanity, diminished responsibility can only be raised by the

The Difference Between Civil Law and Criminal Law

979 words - 4 pages get punitive damages, as the plaintiffs did in the O.J. case, you have to show that the defendant acted recklessly. The burden of proof in a civil case is preponderance of the evidence -- a much lesser burden than is required in a criminal case. So, while a criminal jury might reasonably fail to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and acquit the accused, a civil jury might also reasonably find by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she acted recklessly and should be held civilly accountable for the death.

Corpus Delecti

1141 words - 5 pages . The burden of proof is on the defense to prove that they did not know about the substance and that it was the cause of the act.There are also defects that may occur at the time of the guilty act. Misadventure is when there is no way the person could conclude the result would happen. For example, a man throws a bag of garbage on a burning pile of leaves. The bag contained an empty aerosol can that explodes killing his neighbors' son. The man could

Capital Punishment Essay

560 words - 2 pages Law 12 - LG #5Capital Punishment EssayI believe that capital punishment (the death penalty) should not be reinstated in Canada. Four main reasons for this argument are on the basis of deterrence, retribution, wrongful sentencing, and prejudice towards the accused person.Those people who think that deterrence justifies sending certain criminals to their death bear the burden of proving that the death penalty is a deterrent. The conclusion from

Similar Essays

Who Bears The Burden Of Proof In Tax Litigation

3057 words - 13 pages Involved in federal civil tax litigation? Wondering who has the burden of proof in litigation? Burden of proof is the responsibility to prove the entries, deductions, or statements made on a taxpayer’s return. In order to deduct certain expenses they are substantiated by proof. When the burden of proof is on the taxpayer, the taxpayer keeps adequate records to prove their expenses or has sufficient evidence to support statements. Generally

The Burden Of Proof In English Criminal Law

2418 words - 10 pages subject also to any statutory exception”. From the Judgment of Lord Sankey, the following circumstances where the accused bears the legal burden of proof in criminal cases were established; where the accused pleads the defence of insanity, where a statute or Act of Parliament expressly imposes the legal burden of proof on the defence, and where a statute or Act of Parliament impliedly imposes the legal burden of proof on the defence. An accused

The Burden Of Proof In The Case Of Darling Vs. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital

866 words - 4 pages In the healthcare industry, medical malpractice has a history that extends way beyond the days of physicians carrying a black bag full of medication and remedies to treat patients. Health care has since evolved to digital technology that can detect and treat disease. However, before physicians had advanced machinery making medical diagnosis, doctors had their textbooks and medical judgment to rely on for treatment. Physicians are human and

"Throughout Web Of English Criminal Law One Golden Thread Is Always To Be Seen, That Is A Duty Of The Prosecution To Prove The Prisoner's Guilt". Woolmington V. Dpp (1935) Viscount Shanley

1616 words - 6 pages Before discuss, I have built a plan which helped me to organise my essay:A. What is a Presumption of InnocenceB. Four examples why presumption of innocence matters:1. Burden of Proof:(a) Evidential Burden of Proof(b) Exceptional reversal of the Legal Burden (Insanity)2. Standard of Proof3. Miscarriages of Justice4.BailC. Right to SilencePresumption of Innocence.The presumption of innocence is not explicitly stated in the Constitution but is