Bush Free Trade Diplomacy Has Corporate America Steaming

800 words - 3 pages

BUSH'S FREE-TRADE DIPLOMACY HAS CORPORATE AMERICA STEAMING Business Week; New York; Jul 7, 2003; Paul Magnusson; Mike McNamee;The Bush Administration has a new weapon in the war against terrorism: offering free-trade deals to allies from Australia and Morocco to the tiny Persian Gulf emirate of Bahrain. But the GOP's business allies aren't impressed. They complain that such grand diplomacy makes for poor trade policy. Sensing a way to mend frayed ties to well-heeled business groups, Democrats are taking up their cause.This fall, the Administration intends to start talks on a deal with Bahrain, which supported the Iraq invasion and hosts the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet. And on June 23, President Bush dispatched U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick to the Middle East to kick off a 10-year drive for a regional free-trade zone, pointedly excluding unfriendly Iran and Syria. The idea is to reward friends, enhance economies, and spread the free-market gospel.That's nice, says Big Biz, but what about the bottom line? Two-way trade between the U.S. and Bahrain was a mere $800 million last year, about what the U.S. and Canada ship to each other every 18 hours. "Now that we've given trade such a high economic priority, we shouldn't be using trade to promote other objectives," says Calman J. Cohen, president of the Emergency Committee for American Trade, which represents the largest U.S. exporters. The National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the Business Roundtable are also dismayed.Corporate America has a point. Zoellick's 135 negotiators are already spread so thinly among big multinational talks that the agency is considering teleconferences. Free-trade pacts with individual countries require months of tedious negotiations and, in the case of developing nations, a rewrite of each country's intellectual-property and investment laws -- further distracting the USTR. The deal with Chile, for example, runs to 800 pages and took more than two years to complete.Business fears that the battle to win fast-track negotiating authority for the President will have all been for naught if the Bushies don't concentrate on high-value partners. "Now, we're going to have more negotiators working on little Bahrain than on talks with China," says Howard F. Rosen, former executive director of the Competitiveness Policy Council, a Washington think tank.Dems are relishing the chance to be more pro-business than the GOP as they demand a shift in Administration priorities. "You need to get the most bang for your buck, and there are countries...

Find Another Essay On Bush Free-Trade Diplomacy Has Corporate America Steaming

President George W. Bush - A Liar, a Thief, and a Criminal

918 words - 4 pages for most Corporate Campaign donations 9.     His proposed “Free Trade” agreements would result in the loss of US jobs to foreign markets and the exploitation of third world workers 10.     He has taken 11 official executive actions to undermine reproductive rights… how long will it be before a woman is stripped of her right to choose? 11.     After sending troops off to die in an unjust and unprovoked war, he still has yet to attend any

The Free Trade Area of the Americas

582 words - 2 pages The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became effective in Canada, Mexico, and the United States on January 1, 1994. This agreement removed the tariffs and other trade barriers on goods produced and sold in North America. NAFTA forms the world's second largest free trade area. The largest free trade area is the European Economic Area, which also became effective in 1994. Talks began in late 1994 to expand NAFTA to include all Latin

Two prespectives of Bush's 2004 and JFK's 1964 State of the Union Addresses

957 words - 4 pages President must go to the United Nations. International unity can be an important factor in diplomacy. Kennedy supported the U.N. in every way like approving a new U.N. Bond issue. He also wanted to cooperate with the U.N. to go to the moon and create an International Communications Satellite system. He especially wanted the U.N.'s role in disarmament and solving the issue on nuclear testing. George Bush was the opposite when he started his war on

Public Diplomacy

1960 words - 8 pages crucial position in a global society. In Indonesia, American embassy set up the entertainment venue giving Indonesians access to the use of Free iPads that contained the electronic version of the US Constitution, while they sit and enjoy live jazz music. The center serves the purpose of public diplomacy because it directly engaged the public and increased awareness as well as liking for the United States. Mostly, public diplomacy has been

Essential elements of contemporary diplomacy

2445 words - 10 pages diplomats negotiate and discuss military, trade, economic subsidies issues, and offer information and provide technical assistance . As it is presented in this essay the representation of a state's interest is the main function of diplomacy. Diplomats could not fulfill their activities, especially the most important conducting negotiation, if they were not accredited. It is easy to understand why the qualities of a diplomat are very important since

The Sarbanese-Oxley Act and Its Importance in Business

1261 words - 6 pages president” Moreover, Bush went on to conclude that “free markets are not a jungle in which only the unscrupulous survive, nor a financial free for all guided by only greed” (New York Times). The above quotes by President Bush essentially highlight the problems of corporate business in America in the early 2000s; businesses were more concerned with making fast profits, than with ethics, responsibility and integrity. In a nutshell, the early 2000’s

The Politics of Trade in Steel Case Study MGT448

745 words - 3 pages As the world grows and advances, industrial globalization occurs. Industrial globalization affects the economies of many nations throughout the world. One industry whose globalization has affected the cost and supply of its product is the steel industry. In the last few years, the steel industry has experienced an increased demand for steel, which in turn has caused the cost of steel to increase drastically.1. Do you believe the Bush

Who to Blame for the September 11 Attacks

2065 words - 8 pages . In response to the attacks that took place on September 11, 2001, George W. Bush positively influenced and reassured the American people that America was strong and that the United States would stop at nothing to find who was responsible for such acts. There is speculation that there was an assassination attempt on George Bush the morning of the attack. When George Bush was on his morning jog, a van full of Middle Eastern men arrived at

The Politics of Trade in Steel

652 words - 3 pages president of the United Steelworkers of America, was to protect American jobs by giving the industry a chance to rebound and to give the steel manufacturers a chance to upgrade their mills so that they could compete against the more efficient foreign producers (Hill, 2005). Did the Bush administration do the correct thing? I believe that they tried, but in the end the tariffs only protected the profits of steel employees.do you htink it protected workers

American Public Policy in the Fifties: The Development of Dilemmas

2103 words - 8 pages in the American economy to maintain the American ability to defend freedom in the world: “This country could choke itself to death piling up military expenditures just as surely as it can defeat itself by not spending enough for protection” (464). America in the 1950s rested in a delicate balance between economic prosperity and recession, democracy and Communism, diplomacy and deterrence. After Truman’s initial weakening of the United Nations

War is on the tip of the Bush administrations tongue

920 words - 4 pages , because this war would be without the blessing of the United Nations, meaning they will not have many of the allies they had during the Persian Gulf War.This is an issue that has everyone across the world on the edge of his or her seats. In the United States Government this issue further divides the Democrats and Republicans. President Bush is Republican so of course, the Republicans are behind him. In the article "Aiming to Disrupt Diplomacy, Iraq

Similar Essays

Protectionism And Free Trade In America

2094 words - 8 pages the presidency, Thomas Jefferson gave America advice: "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none." Cutting ourselves off from our global neighbors is no way to promote peace or prosperity because there's only one way to tap the incredible potential that we all share, and only one way to share what each of us has to offer. The argument regarding protectionism and free trade in America can be

Free Trade In South America: Mercosur And Other Groups

1643 words - 7 pages compete on a world stage, they would need to implement a common market. South America has had plenty attempts at common markets, Latin America was first with the Central American Common Market, which they followed with Latin American Free Trade Association. The Latin American Free Trade Association included some countries from South America, making it South America’s first try at a free trade area. Soon after, a sub group called the Andean

Free Trade: America Should Not Protect Industries From Foreign Competition

861 words - 3 pages Free Trade: America Should NOT Protect Industries from Foreign Competition Many politicians oppose free international trade, trade without any restrictions, for a couple of reasons. From their point of view it would affect the United States in several ways: 1. Many USA workers would lose their jobs because factories would be moved to the country with whom the U.S. has a Free Trade Agreement, and where working force

Has The North American Free Trade Agreement Hurt The American Economy?

1005 words - 4 pages taking advantage of Mexico’s free trade agreement with the U.S. (Bethel University, 2006). Perched in his ivory tower and arguing for the defense of NAFTA is Daniel T. Griswold, who takes the view that NAFTA was both “an economic and foreign policy success” (Bethel University, 2006, p.286). Amazingly, in my view, Griswold takes the position that “NAFTA was more about foreign policy than about the domestic economy. Its biggest payoff…has been