This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

California's Supreme Court Weighs In On Proposition 8

511 words - 2 pages

Since 1911 Californians have played an important role in shaping California's Constitution. Then Governor Hiram Johnson began his term by giving the citizens of California a tool in which they could use to adopt laws and constitutional amendments without the support of the Governor or the Legislature. California became the 10th State to adopt the initiative process (Secretary of State Debra Bowen, 2002).In 2008 the citizens of California introduced Proposition 8, a ballot initiative written to overturn an earlier court decision legalizing same sex marriages. Proposition 8 eliminated the right of same sex couples to marry in California. It also provided that only marriage between a man and woman would be recognized in California. With both sides of the issue weighing in the measure was put to the voters on November 4, 2008. The ballot measure passed with 52.3% saying yes and 47.7% saying no (CBS Broadcasting Inc. (CBS). The State immediately adopted the measure on November 5, 2008 and challenges to its constitutionality have been on going through the legal system.While thousands demonstrated outside; the California Supreme Court listened to arguments on the constitutionality of proposition 8. Gay rights advocates are seeking to overturn Prop 8 citing the initiative was put before the voters improperly; specifically that changes to the state constitution must be approved by the state legislature before being put on the ballot. Proponents of the Prop 8 are arguing that the initiative was approved correctly and in a free election the voters choose to exercise their right to change the constitution. Arguing for Prop 8, Ken Starr stated "it would be a...

Find Another Essay On California's Supreme Court Weighs in on Proposition 8

Short summaries on select important Supreme Court Cases

595 words - 2 pages state encroachments.7)Scott vs. Sandford 1857 - case involved Dred Scott, a slave, who sued in federal court for his freedom. Scott contended, in part, that he became free when he was taken into the free portion of the Louisiana territory where Congress had prohibited slavery. The Supreme Court dismissed the suit on jurisdictional grounds. Chief Justice Taney explained that the parties were not citizens of different states because the Constitution

Supreme Court Cases on Separation of Church and State Clauses

2424 words - 10 pages friends and peers were partaking in such a matter. It shows that sometimes maybe the law is on your side, but other times it may not be. These cases could have easily been denied due to the fact of such religious rights on the Supreme Court Justice members, but it was dealt with carefully. Whether it is prayer or student’s rights, a prayer is always in need, but that does not justify the right to have prayer at the beginning of the school day. In

The Supreme Court and its effects on the balance of power between federal and state. (McCullogh v Maryland, Lochner v NY, Nebbia v NY) The role of Supreme Court in relation to federalism

2020 words - 8 pages notes ignoring Maryland law. The Maryland courts decided against him, but after taking his case to the Supreme Court, under the hands of Justice Marshall, the Maryland law was declared to be unconstitutional and void. In order to address this case, two separate powers need to be looked at. The first power is the necessary and proper clause of Article II Section 8, and the second power is the tenth amendment of the Constitution. The necessary and

Were the Supreme Court Cases in the 1890's fair?

1462 words - 6 pages and, therefore, required him to sit in the "colored" car.(Liberman pg 67)Plessy went to court and argued that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution." The judge, a Massachusetts lawyer, was John Howard Ferguson. He had previously declared the Separate Car Act "unconstitutional on trains that traveled through several states." However, in regards to the Plessy trial, he stated that Louisiana could

Argues in favor of the right to marry for same sex couples or homosexuals based on the fourteenth amendment and precedents set in past supreme court cases

3941 words - 16 pages southerners did was strengthen their miscegenation laws. In the 1940's a majority of the states banned interracial marriage because they considered it immoral and 'unnatural' in the same way people consider same-sex marriages immoral and 'unnatural'. In 1878, the Supreme Court of Virginia declared a marriage between a black man and a white woman invalid based on the rationale of 'unnaturality' of interracial marriages. "The purity of public morals," the

AP US History Paper on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court Case

1253 words - 5 pages Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court CaseThe Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Supreme Court case in 1954 revolved around the issue of equality between black and white children in segregated schools. It was the result of a long-standing legal campaign carried on by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), to resolve the effects of Jim Crow laws

The Lawrence v Texas Supreme Court Ruling on Same-sex Activities

671 words - 3 pages based on more than simple moral disapproval of homosexuals (Lindenberger 2008). Currently, there are 19 states with gay legal marriage. In conclusion the Lawrence v Texas Supreme Court ruling of 6-3 not only defined the rights of all citizens concerning intimate acts, heterosexual or homosexual, as protected under the Liberty Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It has in turn started a gay rights movement nationwide. Courts still have unfavorable rulings for some cases but the gay rights community is now making headway for equal treatment in all things.

Brief Biography on Earl Warren, a United States Supreme Court Chief Justice

712 words - 3 pages The "Superchief"Earl Warren is one of the most famous Chief Justice's to have ever served on the United States Supreme Court. His decisions made in court are those that still affect us to this very day. Throughout his life he held many offices of power. Besides being Chief Justice on the Supreme Court, he was the 30th Governor of the state of California and was also the California District Attorney.Earl Warren was born in Los Angeles, California

Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker

967 words - 4 pages The significant impact Robert Dahl’s article, “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker” created for our thought on the Supreme Court it that it thoroughly paved the way towards exemplifying the relationship between public opinion and the United States Supreme Court. Dahl significantly was able to provide linkages between the Supreme Court and the environment that surrounds it in order for others to better

The Role of the Supreme Court in the Civil Rights Movement

1933 words - 8 pages public schools with white children’2. This demonstrates that, although the Supreme Court was working for Civil Rights, it was still unable to force change. Rathbone agrees, saying the Supreme Court ‘did not do enough to ensure compliance’3. However, Patterson goes on to say that ‘the case did have some impact’4. He explains how the ruling, although often ignored, acted ‘relatively quickly in most of the boarder states’5 and that it prompted ‘laws

Role of the United States Supreme Court in obtaining equality for Blacks during Reconstruction

1595 words - 6 pages what rights Blacks should have. With the end of the American Civil War, Blacks were granted their freedom however they were still inferior to whites with legal enactments such as the Black Codes. As time went on, Blacks were continually discriminated against, especially in states south of the Mason Dixon Line (the Southern states that had believed in slavery). As time progressed and more liberal thinkers were added to the Supreme Court, Blacks

Similar Essays

California's Proposition 8 Essay

943 words - 4 pages Supreme Court ruled that same sex couples had a right to marry one another according to the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution of the United States. This overruled earlier legislation known as Proposition 22, which was in fact the same as Proposition 8, but was a part of California’s Family Code, and not written into the constitution. Because the Constitution was given precedence over the Family Code in the Supreme Court’s ruling

Supreme Court In 2000 Election Essay

972 words - 4 pages . Finally Bush took the case to the Supreme Court on the grounds that federal law was being broken.The question arose: Did the United States Supreme Court have jurisdiction in the resent US election in Florida? The first opinion that we will be exploring today states: I. This was a federal issue and therefore the Supreme Court had jurisdiction.Bush's attorneys argued that federal law was being broken. They stated that the laws governing the counting of

The Supreme Court In American Politics

1386 words - 6 pages were entirely redefined in the Supreme Court case of Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). Brandenburg was the leader of the Ohio Ku Klux Klan. He was convicted under a Ohio state law for advocating racial violence at a rally. He made comments not only of racial threats, but also of threats to government officials, which was caught on camera. In a unanimous vote by the Supreme Court Brandenburg’s conviction was overturned. This surprising outcome was

Do Politics Have An Influence On The Supreme Court?

1915 words - 8 pages dominant political ideas of the time and if the courts just follow those ideas and that is the topic I plan to address, but I also wish to address that politics are not the only influence on the Supreme Court and its decisions. I do feel that the court has been influenced because with so many views and beliefs it’s hard not to have an opinion even in such political matters. Although situations in political vary so do the opinions of those in the court