This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Campaign Financing Essay

2601 words - 10 pages

The first main attempt to regulate campaign financing occurred in 1971 with the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). The act set requirements for disclosure of contributions to federal campaigns, both presidential and congressional. The main regulation to financing occurred though after its amendment in 1974. After reports of big financial abuses in the 1972 presidential election and the Watergate scandal, people wanted more constraints on financing particularly those from special interest groups. The act required strict disclosure of campaign donations. Candidates had to name all contributors who donated more than $200 a year. They also set up contribution limits and expenditure limits. Individuals could not contribute more than $1,000 to a candidate and political action committees (PACs) could not contribute more than $5,000. There were also limits on expenditures from a candidate’s personal fund and on total campaign expenditures (The FEC, 2011).
For presidential elections, the FECA instituted a public financing system to level the playing field and limit the amount of money spent on campaigning. During the primaries, there is a matching program where the government will match up to $250 of each contribution made to eligible candidates. In return, they agree to limit their spending. The other program is during the general election; the president receives a lump sum of money and in return they do not accept any further private donations.
The major provision to the FECA that resulted from the misuse of money and Watergate scandal is the prohibition of donations directly from corporations, labor organizations, and national banks. There were also prohibitions against donations from government contractors, foreign nationals, cash contributions over $100, and contributions in the name of someone else (The FEC, 2011). The last thing the FECA established was the Federal Election Commission to ensure the laws of the act are followed.
In 1976, the Supreme Court heard the case of Buckley v. Valeo challenging the Federal Election Campaign Act. The main question was if the limits placed on electoral expenditures by the act violated the First Amendment’s freedom of speech and association clauses (The Oyez Project). The Court came to two conclusions. First it said the restrictions on individual contributions to campaigns and candidates did not violate the First Amendment. It actually said that it enhances the system of representative democracy by capping large contributions that could be potentially corrupting. The Court found that the FECA did violated the First Amendment in its restriction of independent expenditures in campaigns, expenditures by candidates from their personal resources, and on total campaign expenditures in both presidential and congressional elections. Since they found no harm or potential for corruption in these areas they did not deem it warranted to restrict free speech and association. In their decision, the Court came to...

Find Another Essay On Campaign Financing

Money's Influence in Presidential Elections Essay

1243 words - 5 pages passed. It banned almost all forms of soft money. Within this act, the FEC has to regulate campaign financing. This involved financing for president, senate, and representative elections. It also set a contribution limit for individuals of $2,000 for Senate and House primary elections. There was also a limit of $5,000 from PAC per candidate in primary elections and a limit of $5,000 from PAC per candidate in general elections (Trautman, 2013

Trash or Treasure? The evaluation of a website. (whitehouseforsale.com)

993 words - 4 pages organizations that will benefit from presidential decisions to finance a presidential campaigns, and to gain public support for public campaign financing, but also to persuade viewers to stand against the problems involved with presidential campaigns. While this site focus mainly Bush's campaign, it covers Dean and Kerry's campaigns also. This site only focuses on these candidates, because they are the only ones that have opted out of the public

Campaign Finance: How Much is Too Much?

1527 words - 6 pages campaign simply because of the fact they spent more on it. In the 2008 election President Obama paved the way for future elections by being the first major –party candidate to opt out of accepting the public financing system since it was created after the Watergate scandal. “Obama promised last year(2007) that, provided his Republican rival would too, he would abide by the election funding scheme set up after the 1974 Watergate scandal. The scheme

Campaign Finance Reform

1980 words - 8 pages right of free speech is the main combat against campaign finance reform. Opponents say that limiting the amount of money that people can contribute in support of their candidates impedes on free speech rights. But these bills do not completely restrict free speech. They simply impose restrictions on campaign financing to ensure that elections remain a fair, democratic process. If anything, allowing unlimited large contributions from individuals

Presidencial Election

1146 words - 5 pages that this plan would provide universal health care and lower costs should appeal to both sides. Regardless, it is clear that the Democratic Party’s message is intended for its supporters. State Party vs 1928 National Party (Campaign Financing Laws) Another prominent issue being brought to light is campaign financing reform. The Democratic Party platform of 1928 condemned the “improper and excessive use of money in elections as a danger

Campaign Finance

1834 words - 7 pages provisions of the FECA violated freedom of political speech, as it pertains to the First Amendment. Since then, the financing of Congressional campaigns has evolved toward "soft money", unregulated money that goes directly to state and local parties. Soft money has, in effect, changed the way campaigns are financed and the role of interest groups in campaigns (Berry p. 161, '97).Today, campaign finance is a hot issue. In the twenty years since the

Campaign Finance Reform Literature Review

2224 words - 9 pages using combined contributions in the evaluation of the effectiveness of campaign finance legislation, and shows the need for further limitations on campaign financing. Doctor of law, Andrew Spencer, has ideas for a clean election system that will reshape Political Elections without reformatting the unsuccessful Campaign finance Reform Act. A clean election is one that is run with just public funds, with the exception of matching funds provisions

This essay is about what a person has to go through a campaign for the presidency of the US

1186 words - 5 pages . Since the PAC money came from voluntary contributions for union members, rather than from union treasuries, it was not prohibited by previous laws(Smith,1995, no. 238). This was later overturn by the Taft-Hartley Act which banned these types of contributions. In 1971, FECA, or the Federal Election Campaign Act, was created and with it brought about comprehensive framework regulations of federal campaign financing of primaries, runoffs, and general

Campaign Finance Reform

1650 words - 7 pages ). While it may be a violation of freedom of speech to limit television ads, many of today’s candidates have made a mockery of the existing legislature regarding campaign financing. Ex-president Bill Clinton bent the rules and laws more than possibly any elected official ever, and certainly farther than anyone since Richard Nixon. Thad Cochran, a veteran Republican senator from Mississippi, stated, “Clinton used his own party and had it operated out

Should Campaign Spending Be Limited?

2520 words - 10 pages Should Campaign Spending Be Limited?The same day I was given the handout on the exploratory essay I happened to walk by a poster telling people to boycott Coke. At first, I thought it was just some naturalist upset that people would spend millions of dollars on drink that is bad for them. But, after closer inspection, I found the reason for the boycott was because Coke was a major sponsor of Bush's 2000 campaign, therefore supporting the war in

Terrorism Financing Through Charities

2959 words - 12 pages Terrorist Financing." Council on Foreign Relations. Council on Foreign Relations, n.d. Web. 9 June 2014. . "International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism." UN News Center. UN, 9 Dec. 1999. Web. 9 June 2014. . Kampeas, Ron. "Holy Land founders get life sentences." Jewish Telegraphic

Similar Essays

The Problem With Campaign Financing Essay

1452 words - 6 pages campaign financing system is in serious need of reform because it disenfranchises voters and candidates themselves. The fact of the matter is, today’s election campaigns are dominated by corporations and billionaires. The “Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission” supreme court decision has resulted in the rise of mega-donations (amounting to greater than 2000 dollars) to political candidates. The Citizens United decision states that

“The Lonely Death Of Public Campaign Financing” Summary And Critical Response

1382 words - 6 pages process are evident. Still, there is faith in having rule of the people, and only by the people. Works Cited Esenberg, Richard (2010). “THE LONELY DEATH OF PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCING.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 33(1), 283-332. Peoples, Clayton (2013). “Campaign Finance and Policymaking: PACs, Campaign Contributions, and Interest Group Influence in Congress.” Sociology Compass. 7(11), 900-913. Spencer, Andrew (2012). “CLEANING ELECTIONS.” Arizona Law Review. 54(1), 277-309. Teachout, Zephyr (2011). “Facts in Exile: Corruption and Abstraction in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 42(1), 295.

Campaign Finance Essay

1745 words - 7 pages in order to be successful. Campaign financing has become extremely controversial particularly since the 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC. While many believe that the money should be taken out of politics, at this point in time it is impossible to run a successful campaign without a large amount of financing. Candidates who try to do so aren’t able to successfully spread their message and get their name out there and are also destroyed by

Political Fundraising Corruption: Its Effects On Today's Voters

953 words - 4 pages responsible to the voters themselves. A political campaign has an ever-expanding roster of expenditures, including travel expenses, campaign consulting fees, and the alarmingly high cost of communicating with the voters via print advertisements and the media. The fact that Abraham Lincoln nearly impoverished himself by financing his own campaign seems to be nothing more than a charming anecdote from a bygone era. No candidate wishes to bankrupt himself