Campaign Spending Essay

2447 words - 10 pages

Lawn signs, television advertisements, billboards, and political rallies are some of the key components of a successful political campaign. A political campaign is an organized effort which seeks to influence the democratic public that is voting for its elected officials. These seemingly trifling parts of a campaign cost money. Money equals power, is the political mantra in today’s society. Campaigning can cost millions of dollars, and it is logical to believe that only those with the means have the ability to participate in the race for leadership. In a democratic society such as ours, every person has the right to vote and stand up for what they believe is right. Every person, from Donald Trump to the regular middle class citizen, has the right to be a part of our democratic system, which means having the right to run in an election. Not all the funds for a political campaign come from the politician’s wallet, of course. A politician’s goal is to get his ideas and beliefs out there in ways that can create alliances with groups that are willing to donate to help fund his campaign. In order to generate these agreements, one must have a social network that is prominent in the political atmosphere, and to be a part of a social network that is active politically would also require sufficient funding. In more local races it may be possible for a candidate to win based on his notoriety within his constituency, but how does one go about getting this notoriety? This leads me to my research question: Is it justifiable to say that politicians spending more on their political campaigns have a higher likelihood of being elected? With this research question, I plan to demonstrate the relationship between those politicians with the means to produce a strong, wealthy campaign front as opposed to those who do not have the finances to support a campaign, but could be an equally equitable candidate. This is important because as a democratic society everyone should have an equal opportunity to be a part of our government. The outcomes of elections are certainly not set in stone, but we can tell from opinion polls and early voting polls who is the likely candidate to win. If we see that a candidate that is winning in the polls has a lot of financial support behind him then we can assume that he has the greater chance of winning.
In order to find a relationship between the amount a politician spends on his campaign and the greater likelihood of him being elected, I have created the following hypothesis:
H1: The more money a politician spends on his campaign, the greater the chance he has of being elected as opposed to other politicians, who have less funding towards their campaigns.
In this hypothesis, the logic presented is that, the more a politician can spend on his campaign, the more his name and ideas will get out to the public; therefore the greater his chance of being elected. The independent variable is the amount a...

Find Another Essay On Campaign Spending

Campaign Finance: How Much is Too Much?

1527 words - 6 pages the presidential candidates are able to raise and spend on their campaigns. The presidential candidates have far too much money at their disposal and it has greatly affected the way elections are ran and who gets elected to the highest office position. A solution to this problem could possibly be implementing a spending cap on how much money a candidate is allowed to spend on their entire campaign. That would not only even out the playing field

Campaign Finance Reform Essay

1980 words - 8 pages individuals and political committees could contribute to a single campaign and further instituted "public funding." In presidential primaries, individuals could donate up to one thousand dollars to a candidate and the government would match these funds up to $250 (FEC). The catch is that if the candidate chooses matching funds, he or she must abide by specific spending limits (FEC). In the general election, presidential candidates have the option

Presidential Campaign ads of 1968, 1984 and 1996: The Evolution of Campaigns

1279 words - 5 pages During the presidential campaigns of 1968, 1984 and 1996, democrat campaign themes have become increasingly simplistic giving rise to the importance of image. In 1968, a great deal of time and energy is given to the various issues from Social Security, Medicare and family values. In the 1984 campaign the primary focus was to attack Reagan's deficit spending. In 1996 the democratic campaign no longer emphasized issues, instead they used big

Problems Within Political Campaigns

681 words - 3 pages campaign promises to get into office and then do not keep their promises. This is a common practice in politics and people are used to it and that is a problem, when a candidate promises to lower taxes, cut federal spending, or anything else and when they don't they should be held accountable. They need to only make promises they can keep, because some official can make all of these campaign promises that sound really good but they have no

Campaign Finance

1745 words - 7 pages amendments and court rulings. The first of these reform efforts was made through the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which limited direct campaign contributions from individuals and Political Action Committees (Berman 1986). The FECA’s primary goal was to limit campaign spending as the amount of money being spent on political campaigns was increasing drastically (Burton 2004). The issue of controversy that has been being debated for

Campaign Finance

1834 words - 7 pages In the short history of the United States, political campaigns have gone through major changes. Since 1925, Federal laws have limited campaign spending; in 1971, Congress passed the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in reaction to the Watergate affair, revising the limits on campaign spending and contributions. Congress drastically revised this act in 1974. In 1976, the Supreme Court ruled in the Buckley v. Valeo decision that some of the

Political Fundraising Corruption: Its Effects on Today's Voters

953 words - 4 pages governor, is supported by Our Destiny PAC. Super PAC events can be very lucrative for candidates, as proven when Mitt Romney appeared at a Restore Our Future event in July 2011, where millions of dollars were raised. Of course, in adherence to the laws, he did not make any direct appeals for donations. Without true, meaningful campaign spending reforms, the slippery manner in which campaign financing continues to be conducted will further chip away

Marketing Defined

713 words - 3 pages two cities, the marketing campaign was stopped but not before one individual was arrested. "In the zeal to appear cool, IBM gave itself a black eye. Guerilla marketing can be successful and exciting, but not if it appears on every street corner" (Keith Boswell. April, 2001).The focus of a marketing strategy is important. MBNA found this area of marketing important. "MBNA was spending 98 percent of its marketing dollars on getting new customers

Citizens United v. FEC: United We Stand, Corporations and All

1095 words - 5 pages corporations—to spend without limit in…elections” —effectively and surreptitiously overturned Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and portions of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, struck down the corporate spending limits imposed by Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, and extended free speech rights to corporations. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief historical overview of campaign finance law in the United States, outline the

Trash or Treasure? The evaluation of a website. (

993 words - 4 pages information on presidential campaign spending.With Bush spending almost two hundred million dollars in the primaries, with no Party opponents, there has been some major concern regarding the great amounts of money spent on presidential campaigns. Because of that concern, public interest group, Public Citizen, has created the Web site, Not only to inform the average American about the problems with allowing people or

This essay is about what a person has to go through a campaign for the presidency of the US

1186 words - 5 pages the early part of the last century. Over the last 30 years though, the fight for campaign finance reform has intensified ten-fold. They have accomplished with primarily by limiting contributions to and the spending by campaigns. There are many debates deliberating if these, so-called campaign finance regulations have actually accomplished anything. Furthermore, if they have accomplished the objectives that they have originally set out to control

Similar Essays

Should Campaign Spending Be Limited? Essay

2520 words - 10 pages Should Campaign Spending Be Limited?The same day I was given the handout on the exploratory essay I happened to walk by a poster telling people to boycott Coke. At first, I thought it was just some naturalist upset that people would spend millions of dollars on drink that is bad for them. But, after closer inspection, I found the reason for the boycott was because Coke was a major sponsor of Bush's 2000 campaign, therefore supporting the war in

Corporate Political Campaign Spending: Is Democracy For Sale?

1822 words - 8 pages official definition of bribery is as follows: “The act of accepting or offering something of value, such as money, in return for a certain action or influence on a government official.” Now, looking back at the first question, what is the difference between bribery and corporate political campaign spending? The answer, at this point, should seem blatantly obvious; nothing. Bribery is an extremely serious offence in America; offenders, who are found

Article Review Not All Money Is Equal: The Differential Effect Of Spending By Incumbents And Challengers In Gubernatorial Primaries

634 words - 3 pages conclusion on whether or not campaign spending has a significant effect on gubernatorial primaries. Bardwell also discusses the variables that make a difference in the primary elections such as state size, incumbent recognition, past political experience of the challenger and state campaign spending limits. After dealing with these issues, he goes on to hypothesize about the chances a challenger has in defeating an incumbent and how often that

Regulations On Campaigns: Campaign Finance Reform

940 words - 4 pages Madness is finishing something again and again, however, needing an alternate consequence. That really well depicts campaign fund change in America. The more awful the framework gets, the more the U.S. manages it. The more America directs it, the more regrettable it gets. Everything began in 1974, when Congress capped campaign contribution limits and spending. Reason for the cap was that more diminutive gifts and less spending