For a long time now many people have different views about smoking in public places. Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when they want. On the other hand non-smokers feel smokers violate their rights and endanger their life. Smoking causes heart disease, lung cancer and other serious illnesses. Cigarette smoking is the number one cause of lung cancer. A substantial number of lung cancers that occur in non-smokers can be attributed to involuntary smoking. There are some parts in the United States where you can smoke in public places, on the other hand in New York there are designated areas. (1) According to Laura Blue “Smoke-Free Laws Are Saving Lives” www.healthland.time.com/smoke-free-laws-are-savings-lives the government are passing smoke free laws “According to two separate studies, recent laws that limit smoking in public places are contributing to fewer tobacco-related hospital visits and deaths. In 2009 the Institute of Medicine concluded that smoking bans contributed to fewer heart problems in areas where the policies were implemented…”
Secondhand smoking is the third leading cause preventable deaths, that being said the exposure to secondhand smoke has immediate adverse effects on the cardiovascular system and can cause coronary heart disease and stroke. “Secondhand smoke causes nearly 34,000 premature deaths from heart disease each year in the United States among nonsmokers.” Evidence is proven from the official Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website (2) “https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/health_effects/
Secondhand smoke is the combination of smoke from the burning end of a cigarette and the smoke breathed out by smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals. Hundreds are toxic and about 70 can cause cancer. About 2.5 million adults who were nonsmokers died because they breathed secondhand smoke. Secondhand smoke causes numerous health problems in infants and children, including more frequent and severe asthma attacks, respiratory infections, ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome.
Despite the growing evidence supporting their health benefits, however, critics of the laws argue that smoking bans limit the freedom of smokers to choose when and where they smoke. Smoke-free advocates often argue, in response, that restrictions are needed to protect the rights of non-smokers to remain tobacco-free and to protect the freedom of workers in bars and restaurants to avoid the potential health fall-out from their customers’ risky habits. The new evidence isn’t likely to settle this debate over personal freedoms, but, the authors hope, the results may sway more lawmakers to take the negative health effects of smoking more seriously in protecting public health. Heart disease remains the country’s leading killer, and a policy that limits its toll can be hard to ignore.
According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (3)...