This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Can Terrorism Be Morally Justified? How And When? Or Why Not?

2434 words - 10 pages

Can Terrorism be morally justified? How and when? Or Why not?On September 11th 2001, two aeroplanes crashed into the world trade centre in New York, this was the horrifying beginning of what would come to be known 'the age of terror.' Although terrorist acts date back decades, it was this attack on the world's most powerful nation, America, that struck fear into the hearts of the Western people and the potential severity of these attacks was realised. Acts of terrorism are becoming part of everyday news, they are occurring around the world and being carried out by various different groups of people. Reaching a definition of 'terrorism' is an ambiguous task but in his book Terror, Gearty (1991) cited 109 different definitions of terrorism which he obtained in a survey of leading academics in the field. From these definitions, the author isolated the following recurring elements, in order of their statistical appearance in the definitions: Violence, force (appeared in 83.5% of the definitions); political (65%); fear, emphasis on terror (51%); threats (47%); psychological effects and anticipated reactions (41.5%); discrepancy between the targets and the victims (37.5%); intentional, planned, systematic, organized action (32%); methods of combat, strategy and tactics (30.5%).A recurring theme between most definitions is that it deliberately targets innocent people. Leiser's definition (cited in Khatchadourian, 1998, p. 5) equates terrorism with what he calls "the victimization of defenceless, innocent persons" as opposed to "the assassination of political and military leaders". This concept, and now, widely-used tactic is what seems to be the precise element that makes terrorism itself immoral. Like most elusive and ambiguous expressions "terrorism" has a "common core of meaning" in its different usages and this is the notion that "terrorist acts are acts of coercion or actual use of force, aiming at monetary gain (predatory terrorism), revenge (retaliatory terrorism), a political end (political terrorism), or a putative moral/religious end (moralistic/ religious terrorism) (Khatchadourian, 1998, p. 6). Terrorism is a well established aspect of world politics and the literature on this topic is seemingly endless. A major issue when dealing with the topic of terrorism is whether it can be justified and if so, when and how. This essay will explore this issue, taking into account some of the many issues involved.If there are examples of the terrorism permitted under the just war theory, they will have to meet a number of challenging requirements. We will explore a few of these. An element of the just war theory is 'right intention', and it can be argued that terrorism satisfies this criteria although it is from this that we must explore the intentions and motivations of terrorism. Finding the root of terrorism would profoundly affect the occurrence of such acts, and one such cause seems to be oppression of minority groups. Minorities with clear...

Find Another Essay On Can Terrorism be morally justified? How and when? Or Why not?

Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified?

1588 words - 6 pages Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.“ This is a popular quote regarding the state of terrorism, and how certain people may consider terrorism justifiable. Justifying terrorism is, however, not different from justifying innocent slaughter. Justifying innocent slaughter suggests that terrorists believe that political or religious conflicts are more prominent than a segment of

How can, under Catholic laws, the killing of another human being be morally justified?

1470 words - 6 pages only for the right reasons set forth above as a just cause.5. Last Resort: For war to be justified, all peaceful alternatives must have been exhausted.6. Probability of Success: War should not be waged if its purpose is to prevent irrational resort to force or hopeless resistance when the outcome of either will clearly be disproportionate or futile.7. Proportionality: The damage to be inflicted and the costs incurred by war must be proportionate

Is euthanasia ever morally justified in your view? If so why and under what conditions? If not, why not?

3158 words - 13 pages withhold potentially life-­‐saving treatment from patients, what we consider passive euthanasia. However they disallow purposely ending the life of the terminally ill, active euthanasia. Throughout Australia, this seems to be accepted and practiced by many medical professions. There are a few ways in which we can argue whether euthanasia can be morally justified or not. When referring just to Active and Passive Euthanasia, we could argue

Berlin and Pettit: Can their accounts of liberalism be sustained when considering anti-terrorism laws?

2463 words - 10 pages freedom from domination and considers the role laws and democracy can play in assuring individual freedoms. In addition to considering the respective approaches of Berlin and Pettit, their theories will also be considered in relation to terrorism. By considering their respective arguments in the context of terrorism, it becomes important to conceptualize laws not in terms of those which respect or interfere with our freedom, but rather how they are

Can a definition of “Religion” be academically useful? Pick yes or no, and provide an argument as to why or why not?

996 words - 4 pages philosophers was because early theorist did not have the field or study of religion. Early theorists where classified as anthropologists and sociologists in most cases; and thus tended to bring in parts of their study into religion. Anthropologists study prehistoric civilizations, they were very comfortable with that subject, which is why they used it to prove points in their religious models. For example early social anthropologist E.B. Taylor used a

Can a definition of “Religion” be academically useful? Pick yes or no, and provide an argument as to why or why not?

763 words - 4 pages A definition of Religion is and can be academically useful. It’s the same as with science as it is with religion, the ability to have a definition, creates academic validity for the subject. One has the ability to point to a certain section or a topic of a book and then support themselves with a fundamental definition. Now the problem that arises in religious studies is that the definition is not always accurate or consistent. Many different

What are "Spirituality, Religion, and the Supernatural"? How are they the same? Different? Can one exist without the others? Why or why not? How have these concepts affected you (or not) in the...

1320 words - 5 pages not ethical or moral. They'll pick right or wrong based on what they feel not what a motto says. With so many different religions in the world how does anyone know what they should do ethically or morally? Can going to church really be ethically better then not going to church? Who decides what the ethically right thing to do is? Can there be one without the other? Can we be good people who don't care what religion we are? Can I live my

Why you should not spank, and why spanking can be bad for the child and the parent

573 words - 2 pages reinforcement," says Masterson. Try saying yes, instead of starting each answer with no. If your child wants ice cream before dinner, say 'yes, you may have ice cream after dinner.Spanking does teach a lesson. The lesson is: "When you don't know what else to do - hit!" or "When you're bigger you can hit." Or "When you're really angry you can get your way by hitting." It's common knowledge that children who are frequently hit are more likely to accept the use of violence and are more likely to hit other children. It only makes sense, because, after all, children learn what they live. Children who are spanked often have more resentment and anger and lower self-esteem.

Is the ban on Muslim headscarves in French schools justified? If so, why? If not, why?

1585 words - 7 pages important to offer further reasons as to why this ban is not justified. In particular, I will illustrate how this ban compromises one’s autonomy and infringes on their positive and negative liberty. To begin, as autonomy is basically the capability to be one’s own person, and thus the ability to decide one’s own conception of the good and way to lead one’s life, this ban compromises a child’s future, as it eliminates the opportunity to be

The Causes of Terrorism and How it can be Stopped

3107 words - 12 pages they have to destroy the remaining peace in our world? Before this research, I realize that terrorism took so many forms. Since terror means fear, horror, and fright, terrorism was a just "horrible thing" to me. Now, it is an issue that has a great impact on our society and world; it is not to be taken lightly. Many analysts, researchers, and professors have tried to define the purpose of terrorism. Some believe that that can only be achieved

What advantages did Xerxes enjoy when he invaded Greece in 480 BC and why did he not gain victory over the Greeks?

2698 words - 11 pages CLASS 2035: Glory of Athens & Shadow of SpartaClassics Major EssayWhat advantages did Xerxes enjoy when he invaded Greece in 480 BC and why did he not gain victory over the Greeks?Cormac Griffin (A1177407)IntroductionThe victory of the Greeks over the Persians in the Second Persian War is, to this day, one of the peaks of Hellenic history. Arguably, this is because the result was so unforeseen. The disjointed and fragmented Greeks, divided

Similar Essays

Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? If So How? If Not, Why Not?

3205 words - 13 pages Martin AllanIPM0630Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? If So How? If Not, Why Not?Terrorism is the deliberate and systematic murder, maiming, and menacing of the innocent to inspire fear for political ends. This definition was proposed by terrorist analysists in 1979, but has never been surpassed for clarity and concision. Schmidt and Youngman in their book Political Terrorism for example, cited 109 different definitions of terrorism, which they

Can Euthanasia Be Justified Morally? Essay

1152 words - 5 pages "morality" in various ways. Aristotle posits that the highest good is always an end and not the means, whilst Hobbes and Locke refute this concept, stating that what is essentially deemed good is all relative to the desires of the agent (the individual or entity) (Macintyre 1996: 57-157). The universally agreed meaning of morality might never be achieved but we can all consent to the "good" being apparent in all that is presumed to be moral. Euthanasia

Can Terrorism Be Justified? Essay

685 words - 3 pages Can terrorism be justified?The devastation and destruction that terrorism causes has impacted greatly on the USA and the world. The 1983 Beirut barracks bombings have shown how terrorism is not justified, and how it has caused a worldwide issue, involving not only America but France, England and Italy. The bombings were not justified by the group/individuals responsible, and their reasons for the attacks were not supported, and not accepted by

When Can War Be Justified Or Wronged?

627 words - 3 pages War Can Be Justified“Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” are few of the rights the constitution guarantees everyone as an American citizen. How can that be obtained if America is being attacked by foreign countries that won’t stop? Our nation will not go to war, because we have decided that war is not worth the bloodshed. Until war is upon the attackers, what makes them afraid so that they will stop the attacks? Nothing