This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Capital Punishment: A Negative Way To Deter Crime

2404 words - 10 pages

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, and a foot for a foot is a well known phrase that means when someone commits a wrongdoing against another person they must be punished the same way. But how far can this statement go, should the government have rights to kill someone if a person kills another? Or does anyone have the right to sentence a person to the death penalty even if they stole grapes or killed a chicken? The death penalty may limit crime, but it is not a positive form of punishment due to the financial burdens on the government, killings of the innocent, and moral and ethical issues.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most extreme measure of all sentencing (Schmalleger 407). The death penalty has existed since the Ancient Laws of China punishing those who committed crimes. The first documented laws were from the Eighteenth Century BC in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. In the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon there were twenty five crimes that could result in the death penalty; none of them were for murder (Frontline). Hittite Code from the Fourteenth Century BC also included the death penalty. By the Seventh Century every crime that was committed resulted in the death penalty under the Draconian Code of Athens (Death Penalty). The Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets also included the death sentence. A person could be crucified, beat to death, burned alive, impaled, or drowned for the execution (Death Penalty). A few crimes during the Fifth Century BC in the Roman Law that resulted in the death penalty were: perjury, murder of a freeman or parent, theft, cutting or grazing of crops that were planted by a farmer, or burning a house.
By the Tenth Century AD, Britain began using hanging as the primary execution strategy (Death Penalty). In the Eleventh Century, William the Conqueror stated that people cannot be hanged or executed any other way unless it is during a war (Frontline). However, by the 16th Century AD, Henry VIII allowed executions once again. Nearly 72,000 people were thought to have been executed during his reign (Death Penalty). During Henry VIII reign there were different forms of executing people used. Boiling, hanging, beheading, burning at the stake and drowning were used as execution methods (Death Penalty). These executions would occur for reasons such as marrying a Jew, treason, and not confessing crimes that were committed (Death Penalty). By 1700 in Britain there were 222 different crimes that could be punished by death (Frontline). A couple of these crimes were stealing or cutting down a tree (Frontline). But for 1823-1837 the death penalty began to eliminate 100 of the crimes that could cause an execution.
In 1767, Cesare Beccaria wrote an essay, On Crimes and Punishment, which discussed the fact there is no justification for the state to take someone’s life (Death Penalty). This essay resulted in abolishing the death penalty in Austria...

Find Another Essay On Capital Punishment: A Negative Way to Deter Crime

Punishment for a crime has the purpose of deterring future criminality. Death as a penalty, has been given to serious criminals without solid evidence of its effectiveness to deter serious offenses

2156 words - 9 pages Lee PAGE 2 Sang Won LeeDr SiskDeath Penalty: Unconstitutional, but Legalized MurderPunishment for a crime has the purpose of deterring future criminality. Death as a penalty, has been given to serious criminals without solid evidence of its effectiveness to deter serious offenses. Actually, the crime rate is decreasing in Europe where the death penalty is not imposed, in the United States, on the other hand, where the death penalty is imposed

Assignment: Punishment Research Paper Statistics show that there is a high rate of criminal recidivism in the United States. This raises the question, "Does punishment deter crime?"

993 words - 4 pages relies upon examples of punishment made known to everyone ahead of time before they choose to break the law. This concept is based on idea that citizens will not break the law if they think that the pain of the punishment will outweigh the pleasure of the crime. Everyday on the way to work you have a choice to leave early reaching your destination without breaking the law by speeding. If you are late, you might choose to speed knowing the

Death Penalty: Capital Punishment and Violent Crime

1590 words - 6 pages bring justice to society. When the same poll asked those who were against the death penalty their reasons to be opposed to capital punishment, they stated that it was wrong to take a life, wrongful convictions may occur, it did not deter crime, it was unfairly applied, rehabilitation was possible and punishment should be left to God. About a year ago, while I was watching a popular television show, I heard a spokesman for Amnesty International claim

Capital Punishment: Treat people the way you want to be treated

1816 words - 8 pages punishment should be solely based on incidents that include first-degree murder. Law enforcement is beyond capable of determining the difference between an accidental murder and an intentional murder. The reasoning for this to be a social dysfunction, is because not all people think the exact same way, causing law enforcement to disagree on a country law. This causes the United States Judicial System to question the ethics of capital punishment on a

Capital Punishment, proven to be an effective deterrent of major crime

964 words - 4 pages methods of Capital Punishment wereused to deter a variety of crimes. For over a century, the uniformmethod for executing persons in America was hanging, althoughstarvation was very common also. There were exceptions whichincluded spies, traitors, and deserters who would face a firingsquad. Then in 1888, New York directed the construction of an'electric chair' (Flanders 11). It was believed that the newharnessed power of electricity would prove

Capital Punishment, Should It Be Used As A Way Of Disciplining Criminals?

1421 words - 6 pages There is one question that has always brought about controversy.Should capital punishment be used as a way of disciplining criminals? Overthe past twenty years, there has been an enormous increase in violent crimes.It seems logical that a person is less likely to commit a given act if by doing sohe will suffer swift and certain punishment of a horrible kind. As mostAmericans agree, death is the only appropriate punishment for such crimes.In

Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition

1108 words - 4 pages Capital PunishmentI will argue for the claim that Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition.My argument centers on the simple violation of human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the U.N. in 1948, asserts "the right of every individual to protection from deprivation of life". It states that no person shall be subjected to cruel or

"Capital Punishment Cannot Prevent Murder" talks about the negative aspects of the death penalty

1396 words - 6 pages because thereby their crime attains more publicity (Pro und Contra, 3). Certainly, no one can punish the skyjackers of September 11 with the death penalty anymore, but I am very sure that every single terrorists who also had something to do with the attacks would rather chose capital punishment for himself/herself than a life time in prison. Should they get what they want? Do they deserve our attention?Those who want to abolish capital punishment

Capital Punishment~Right or Wrong? Essay about the different views involving the death penalty and why they might feel that way

646 words - 3 pages concequences is usuallyirrelevent to their state of mind at the time that theycomit the crime. (Capital Punishment- Cruel and Unusual?)Most murders are "crimes of passion". They arecommitted under the influence of the extremely blindingemotions of "rage, hatred, jealousy, or fear." In fact, theamount of unplanned murders account for more than ninetypercent, whereas, planned is about ten percent. So, thenwho is likely reconcinder a crime because of the

Boot Camps: A Good Way to Deter Youth Offenders in Queensland?

1718 words - 7 pages examine whether they are a useful avenue to follow. The use of boot camps has been controversial in many countries around the world, such as the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom and this paper will examine whether these controversial camps would be a good way to deter youth offenders within Queensland. With the introduction of the Youth Justice (Boot Camp Orders) 2012 Amendment bill it was hoped that the youth would have a real chance

A Call to End Capital Punishment

1785 words - 7 pages execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime which might be murder or treason. The amounts of problems associated with capital punishment are massive, ranging from the innocent dying for a crime he/she never committed to racism, and the only way to resolve these problems is to eliminate capital punishment. According to the online Webster dictionary capital punishment is defined as the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a

Similar Essays

‘Capital Punishment Is The Only Real Way To Deter Potential Criminals’ Discuss And Evaluate How Introducing Capital Punishment Fulfills The Aims Of Criminal Sanctions

1311 words - 6 pages Liam O'Shea'Capital punishment is the only real way to deter potential criminals' Discuss and evaluate how introducing capital punishment fulfils the aims of criminal sanctions.We read stories of ancient times where grand armies march and conquer vast lands, killing thousands of inhabitants and executing their leaders in front of the masses. These events to us seem medieval and brutal; however we only need to go a certain distance to find these

Is Capital Punishment A Human Way To Deal With Criminals?

1355 words - 5 pages Capital Punishment has been around for as long as there has been written language. It has been used all over the world, in different cultures, and has been executed in different styles. In the past, the death penalty was taken for granted for almost any crime you can think of (Garland). However in today’s society, the question has been asked if Capital Punishment is a humane way to deal with criminals. For most of recorded human history

The History Of Capital Punishment As A Deterrent To Crime

2741 words - 11 pages stand their ground on their opposing viewpoints on this cause (Marzilli 19). Supporters of the death penalty strongly believe that capital punishment is an effective deterrent to crime. They assume that if you take a criminal off the streets and away from the pubic, then the streets will be a lot safe. If that being the case, then on one particular account “LWOP (life without parole) cannot prevent of deter offenders from killing prison staff or

“Capital Punishment Is The Right Way To Deal With Murderers.”

942 words - 4 pages Capital punishment is when somebody is killed by the state for committing a crime. The aim of capital punishment is revenge towards someone for their crime or crimes. Some examples of capital punishments are: the firing squad, when several soldiers or law enforcement officers are instructed to fire simultaneously at somebody; being hanged, also referred to as drawing and quartering; the electric chair, when a person is strapped to a chair and