Capital Punishment Is Murder Essay

1750 words - 7 pages

American history is replete with examples of brutality and foolishness that will forever blot the American conscience. Early in this century, Sacco and Vanzetti were railroaded for a murder of which they were almost certainly innocent. The trial was a farce, and the verdict was a more a result of bias against Italians than of the evidence. Their lives were forfeit. Later in the century, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were tried for conspiracy to commit espionage. Despite questionable evidence and even more questionable conduct on the part of prosecuting attorneys and government agencies, they were convicted; the verdict was a statement of public hysteria and fear of Communism. They too met the executioner. Not yet ingrained in the annals of history, in the past months the state of Texas executed a man who even the state admitted had not pulled the trigger, but was only an accomplice. If the recent elections prove anything, it is that these examples of the state-sanctioned murders of innocents have done nothing to change the American mind. Many Republicans ran and won on a "law and order" platform; in New York, Governor George Pataki defeated former Governor Mario Cuomo largely on the basis of Cuomo's opposition to capital punishment. This article is an appeal to readers' morality, to their consciences. It does attempt to show that the death penalty is costly and impractical (though it is), or that it is unconstitutional (which it may well be). The article is an appeal for mercy.

Perhaps the greatest problem with the death penalty, as the cases of the Rosenbergs and of Sacco and Vanzetti point out, is the chance for error incurred in capital cases. A study conducted at Stanford University found that, since 1900, more than fifty people have been executed who were later proven to be unquestionably innocent. In at least twice as many cases, serious doubts about the guilt of the condemned came to light after their executions. Our criminal justice system is imperfect, and the existence of capital punishment guarantees that innocent people will be put to death. This opportunity for error is present in all verdicts and punishments. It is the finality of execution that distinguishes capital punishment: the government can release and compensate someone mistakenly sent to jail when his or her innocence is proven. For those who have been executed, the state can only offer condolences to their families.

Advocates of capital punishment claim that innocents are only very rarely put to death, and that for the most part those sentenced to die are certainly guilty. This argument is definitely true, but it is a sad commentary on our society that death penalty advocates casually dismiss the murder of innocents at the hands of the state as a necessary evil. If they carry through their plans to limit appeals in death penalty cases, this will only increase the number of innocents executed. Even if it does save money by eliminating appeals, this economic...

Find Another Essay On Capital Punishment is Murder

"Capital Punishment Cannot Prevent Murder" talks about the negative aspects of the death penalty.

1396 words - 6 pages University found evidence to clear Dennis Williams of murder charges" (Know Your World Extra). The justice system failed once again. Furthermore, it is also possible that people become executed, although they cannot be held responsible for their actions. In some states in the U.S. murderer can be condemned even though they might have a mental illness.A last argument that is always mentioned in the explanation statement for capital punishment is that it

Capital Punishment is Unethical Essay

1415 words - 6 pages able to understand and discuss the morality of capital punishment. Only certain crimes are punishable by death. These crimes vary by state but nearly all states include some variation of aggravated first-degree murder. Capital cases take more time and cost more money to prosecute than similar cases with the penalty of life in prison. After the appeal process has been exhausted an execution date is set. Beginning 30 days prior to the execution the

Capital Punishment is Wrong

1539 words - 6 pages Capital Punishment is Wrong Lethal injection, electrocution, hanging, beheading, stoning. Just some of the ways used to murder people in many countries across the world. But the difference with these murders is that they are committed by the state, they are given the name "capital punishment". The claim is that they are justified as a means of punishment, but can intentional killings ever be justified? Or is, as I

Capital Punishment Is Necessary

1485 words - 6 pages sanctity of human life. That is precisely the reason why this form of crime prevention should be maintained. Capital punishment is different from murder because the person being executed had committed a crime and was tried and found guilty. An execution carried out after a trial cannot be compared to a murder committed by a criminal. Lastly, it is suggested and often proven that the death penalty discriminates against the poor and minority groups. One

Is Capital Punishment Ethical?

2392 words - 10 pages Capital punishment is a difficult subject for a lot of people because many question whether or not it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. In order to critically analyze whether or not it is ethical, I will look at the issue using a utilitarianism approach because in order to get a good grasp of this topic we need to look at how the decision will impact us in the future. The utilitarianism approach will help us to examine this issue and see

Capital Punishment is Ineffective

2329 words - 9 pages reforms in the United States is noted. Thomas Jefferson and four of his colleagues were authorized to revise the Virginia's laws and proposed that the death penalty should only be for treason and murder. Almost ten years earlier, an Italian jurist named Cesare Beccaria published a book called “On Crimes and Punishment” and considered to have a large impact on the ideas towards capital punishment. He argued that the state had no right to take a life

Capital Punishment is Barbaric

1054 words - 4 pages Capital Punishment is Barbaric Capitol punishment has not always been a controversial issue. For most of history, most governments have punished numerous crimes by way of death. However, in the mid-18th century critics of this form of punishment began to emphasize the worth of the individual. They considered these practices unjust. The controversy and debate continue today. The first significant movement to the abolishment of the death

Is Capital Punishment Just?

3054 words - 12 pages Is Capital Punishment Just? Many people often debate over the legitimacy over capital punishment, whether or not a person can receive the death penalty as a punishment if he or she commits an act of murder. Some argue that the death penalty is a justly act against dangerous criminals while others argue that the penalty is immoral, playing the role of God, and does not even lower the crime rate one bit. In fact, the death penalty is a

Is Capital Punishment Moral?

2012 words - 8 pages system things may go awry that may lead to false imprisonment. False imprisonment would contribute to killing another innocent. What kind of crime could a person commit that there punishment is nonetheless the death sentence? Some of the crimes like rape, murder, pretty much any criminal acts should be considered before taking the individuals life. Capital punishment is considered morally wrong, because it is taking an individual’s life in a very

Capital Punishment Is Wrong

2442 words - 10 pages get back at the U.S. government for a previous mass murder and with the execution the U.S.government will be getting back at Timothy McVeigh, in other words revenge. (Don't kill McVeigh, 2001). The issue is not McVeigh, but whether our State and government should at ant time take the life of anyone convicted of murder. If capital Punishment is wrong, it's wrong in all circumstances. Bud Welch, who in the blast lost his only daughter, was quoted in

Is Capital Punishment Biblical?

1322 words - 5 pages opponents of capital punishment. "The Hebrew word for 'kill' really means a violent, unauthorized death; the killing in a violent passionate way."10 The man who commits murder has lost the right to be a member of society and to move freely among men. A murderer must be removed by force or be incarcerated, so that he is not permitted to bring sorrow, heartache, and disaster into other homes.Those who advocate the death penalty argue that when Jesus spoke

Similar Essays

Capital Punishment Is Murder Essay

1041 words - 4 pages slewed arguments. The basic fact remains that killing is morally and ethically wrong. This fact does not disappear by simply changing the term "murder" to "capital punishment." The act is still taking of a life. Financial costs, wrongly accused felons and the myth that it will deter future crimes, are just a few reasons that we as a society must abolish capital punishment. It is sometimes suggested that abolishing capital

Capital Punishment Is Murder Essay

1252 words - 5 pages Capital Punishment is Murder   Capital punishment is state-sanctioned, premeditated murder.  It is morally, ethically, socially wrong.   Murder is the intentional killing of one person by another.  Capital punishment takes the life of one person and uses another, "the executioner," to do it.  In the state of Indiana, the warden of the state prison acts as "the executioner."  The killing takes place

Capital Punishment Is An Appropriate Penalty For Murder

2123 words - 8 pages suffering he or she volunteered to go through. Like when you sky dive you assume the risk that your parachute may not open and you may die. It is the same thing for a person who commits a murder. Capital punishment is a very controversial topic in our society. Many want it to stay while others want it to go. After reading both Bedau’s and Haag’s I would have to side with Haag. Capital punishment may be guilty of some maldistributions, but

Capital Punishment On Crimes Other Than Murder

612 words - 2 pages We all agree that killing a person on purpose is a murder and the killer should be killed, since he gave himself the right to take the life of a person for any reason then the capital punishment will be the right of taking his life. But with most of the crimes the death penalty should not be used, and I say most of the crimes because some crimes are considered like murder so the death penalty should be applied.A crime is giving the right to take