When looking at an article from the author’s point of view and looking at it again from an eyewitness point of view, things can be seen in two very different ways. When being present at any event you can, and will draw a very vivid picture of the event when reflecting on it later in life. When an event is looked at from an author’s point of view, years or centuries later, the writing content will be different and hold a perspective from someone who getting their information from say, a book or the internet. When you look at a situation like Captain Preston’s and his accounts of the Boston Massacre, you can see what is to be said about two different viewpoints and how they are construed.
A thesis to anyone can be seen within the first sentence of the introduction or it can be seen in the last sentence of the introduction. In this article one can clearly see the thesis in the beginning of the paper. “It is [a] matter of too great notoriety to need any proofs that the arrival of his Majesty's troops in Boston was extremely obnoxious to its inhabitants”[footnoteRef:1] This is the thesis because it’s not stating a historical fact or option of the author (Captain Preston). It is a statement in which he is using to catch the readers eye, in hopes that they will read more. [1: Thomas Preston, “Captain Preston’s account of the Boston Massacre March 5, 1770” American History from revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 3 July 2017, http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1751-1775/captain-prestons-account-of-the-boston-massacre-march-5-1770.php]
Preparing the article is something Captain Preston did to create a learning environment about the Boston Massacre to a person(s) who may be unfamiliar with the topic. When looking at the article, one can see that it was created to be as real as possible, so that the reader can find themselves creating a mental picture. Created it in such a way, to draw the reader in and make them feel as if he or she was present during that time. If you look at the following passage it clarifies the vivid picture he was trying to create. “They immediately surrounded the sentry posted there, and with clubs and other weapons threatened to execute their vengeance on him. I was soon informed by a townsman their intention was to carry off the soldier from his post and probably murder him”[footnoteRef:2]. Being able to get a reader to paint a picture in their head of what they are reading takes great time and great writing skills from the author. [2: Thomas Preston, “Captain Preston’s account of the Boston Massacre March 5, 1770” American History from revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 3 July 2017, http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1751-1775/captain-prestons-account-of-the-boston-massacre-march-5-1770.php]
When considering not only what the author is trying to convey, but who he is trying to convey it to, is something that can be seen through his writing. The strategy and organization Captain Preston...