This paper provides an analysis of various photographs based on their categories, effectiveness, and historical movements. The three concepts of analysis are important when examining photographs, as they provide a strong basis for evaluation. The analytical process begins with category placements and end with contextual and historical movement evaluations as one considers the application of time, space, and the intended message of the six photographs. Photography goes beyond the automatic recordings produced by the picturing equipment; every picture symbolizes, represents, or means something.
Each of the six photographs falls in at least one of the categories mentioned above. Aaron Siskend’s photograph falls under descriptive photographs and explanatory photographs. The photograph of Aaron Siskend can be considered as descriptive photograph because it shows a visual description of the sky. By giving an explanation of how cloudy the sky is, the photograph can be considered as an explanatory picture. The photograph can be used by scientists to explain the weather patterns by relying on the types of clouds represented on it.
Bernd and Hilla Becher’s photograph can be categorized as a descriptive, explanatory, and interpretive photograph. In view of its descriptive nature, Bernd and Hilla Becher provide a portrayal of construction works going on at a particular place. The photograph is considered an explanatory piece of art as it shows the processes engineers go through to construct towers. As an interpretive photograph, this particular picture provides an explanation to the advancement in construction technology. The photograph shows how engineers have made significant steps in construction technology.
Like Bernd and Hilla Becher’s photograph, Charles Sheeler’s piece, which is a picture of an industrial plant, also falls under the three categories: descriptive, explanatory, and interpretive photographs. The photograph of industry by Charles Sheeler is considered a descriptive snapshot as it shows how complicated an industry looks like. It also falls under the explanatory category because it provides details of the industry in question, including its structure. It is considered an interpretive photograph because it goes beyond giving an explanation to describe the importance of a factory in an economy.
Eve Sonneman’s photograph of oranges can be categorized under the descriptive and interpretive categories. As a descriptive photograph, the picture by Eve Sonneman simply depicts an orange as a type of fruit that is popular among human beings. The photograph is regarded as interpretive given the fact that it can be used to explain the kind of economic activity that goes on in the captured location. Based on the photograph, it is palpable that the kind of economic activity that takes place in the region is horticulture.
Lynne Cohen’s photograph of a corridor can be categorized as an aesthetically evaluative and theoretical photograph. As an...