Censorship, Necessary Or Not Essay

921 words - 4 pages

Censorship, Necessary or Not


In Plato’s Republic, he tries to develop a utopia for mankind. He utilizes conversation amongst people within in his book as a vehicle for larger and more serious topics to be discussed. One of the most important propositions made in these discussions is when Socrates and Glaucon are deliberating on the issue of censorship and its necessity in the beginning of “Book III.” Plato leads me to believe that censorship is a necessary evil that must exist to protect the city as a whole. The question arises when addressing this subject matter; does society need censorship to rise to its full potential? Plato seems to think yes, but for me the jury is still out.
“Book III” of the Republic begins by talking about how to create warriors and what the necessary precautions needed to convince people that death is not a bad thing are. Plato wants to invent citizens that are “unafraid of death, preferring it to defeat in battle or slavery (386b4).” Plato believes that the only way to do this is through the censorship of materials that people are exposed to. Plato wants to create a society where everyone worthy of enough desires to be a warrior and where citizens are volunteering to fight for their city-state. The only way he believes it is possible to eliminate people’s fear about death is by eliminating the stories they have been raised on. Plato further reflects on this idea of censorship by saying:

Then we must supervise such stories and those who tell them, and ask them not to disparage the life in Hades in this unconditional way, but rather to praise it, since what they now say is neither true nor beneficial warriors (386b7-386c1).

Many modern day people have taken what Plato said and have implemented into the society with which they live in an attempt to create a utopia of warriors for their benefit. Hitler comes to mind and his development of youth camps. Hitler burned books and brainwashed people for the sake of the state rather then their intellectual well being. Censorship also exists in the United States today, even though we are a society based on freedom of speech. There are people in this nation who try to get books banned from high school curriculums everyday because they feel it is the wrong opinion or information for today’s youth to have. Do I believe they are in the right? To be perfectly honest I think that the deterioration of society can be attributed to those who attempt to restrict free thought. Plato may be right in saying that the...

Find Another Essay On Censorship, Necessary or Not

Censorship in Schools is not Justifiable

1124 words - 4 pages Censorship in School is Not Justifiable Walt Whitman once said, “The dirtiest book of all is the expurgated book.” Between the years 2000 and 2009 a total of 3200 books were challenged in school libraries in an attempt to expurgate, or censor, the content in books provided to students. Today the trend of censorship continues as popular novels such as The Hunger Games, The Fault in Our Stars, and Captain Underpants are censored from schools

Should the policy of Internet censorship be adopted in the society?

588 words - 3 pages social norms and morals. Internet censorship could effectively prohibit someone from bullying or intimidating another. Internet censorship is sometimes necessary to protect society, because it could keep the stability of the society and a country. Spreading rumours might result in social upheaval, and divulging military secrets might collapse the national defence system; neither of them is acceptable in a harmonious society, and the above

Pros and Cons of Censorship: Controlling Media and Ideas

906 words - 4 pages Censorship, or what I like to call “controlled media”, is the control of ideas and content in our world. For as long as people have discovered that human beings have free will, there has been a way to regulate, govern and block the expression of its uses. There are many types of censorship when it comes to military, religion, political, public media or for just morale reasons. There have naturally been debates on whether censorship has truly

The Limitations of Societal Growth Established by Censorship in Films

1476 words - 6 pages content is penalized from view by the public, which ensures that citizens are not outraged or offended by material in films. The government can act in the best interests of the people by regulating films for any offensive material without bias. This material can extend to film producers who use sexual and violent content to reinforce their ideas. Thus, government control of censorship can help to increase fair and socially acceptable representation in

censorship in society

828 words - 4 pages will. Dictating the do’s and don’ts encroach on an individual’s free will. There must be a balanced limit in the degree of censorship in our society. As long as it provides safety and welfare for society to flourish then censorship is necessary. An example consists of preventing children from watch vulgar television or movies. Providing this censorship promotes safety for them and allows them to grow in morally better environment. Children are the

Media Censorship

644 words - 3 pages for the protection of the family, the church, and the state. Additionally some religious groups, opposed to the violence shown in different types of media, say censorship works. Still more that believe in civil rights think that it is an unnecessary violation of the right to freedom of speech for all humans. Censorship of the media for children is necessary, but should not be handled by government or other groups. Instead it should be

Is Censorship Justifiable?

928 words - 4 pages considering some of the radicals that rebel just for the sake of rebelling.Censorship, in fact, is not a new process in this world. It has been around for centuries in different forms and applications. Ancient rulers used the rules of censorship to prevent knowledge from getting to their subjects. The ancient roman emperor Augustus - (27 BC - 14 AD) led his subjects by an iron hand, ordering all opposition to be squashed claiming that the loss of liberty

A Look at the Arguments for and Against Censorship

1681 words - 7 pages Findings “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press” (Roleff, Barbour, and Szumski 5). Controversy surrounds the topic of censorship. Americans generally believe in the freedom of speech and expression, but some citizens of the liberal USA support censorship. Internationally speaking, censorship is not really a topic of discussion, it just exists. Librarians have struggled with censorship over the years and

The Negative Effects of Censorship

3851 words - 15 pages form of censorship that is destroying American culture is in literature. Literary censorship has been proven to be detrimental, as works of literature often make valid points about social issues through a metaphorical format. As shown in “The Jungle ‘revealed suffering’ ”, if The Jungle had been censored or even not permitted to be published, one could only imagine the gruesome working conditions that Americans would still be working under today

Censorship is necessary in modern society

442 words - 2 pages language and taboo subjects in their performances. Critics of censorship argue that the only people who will watch or listen to such material are adults who have made a conscious decision to do so. Thus, it is claimed, it is unjust to censor material like this since it is not forced upon people who may subsequently be offended by it.All things considered, it can be concluded that a certain degree of censorship is always necessary. The best course of action would be to attempt to achieve a balance between the requirements of the country and the public on the one hand, and individuals' rights on the other.

Music Censorship and the Taking Away of Our Rights

2318 words - 9 pages criticize the police, but it doesn't require Wal-Mart to carry any one band's records. Believe it or not, many attempts to censor, ban or suppress popular music in the United States are entirely legal (Nuzum). With this being true censorship becomes less of an issue of legality, and more of an issue of morality. It is important that censorship of music be looked at as to whether or not it is going to improve the world we live in. Many people

Similar Essays

Censorship: Justified Or Not? Essay

1185 words - 5 pages strives to prove that censorship is sometimes justified. Censorship as defined by Wikipedia is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by a government, media outlet or other controlling body. This context in itself is not acceptable as we have no rights to limit a person’s freedom of speech as that is the basic right we

Censorship: Good For Society Or Not

799 words - 4 pages Censorship of media should remain in the hands of the individual, not the government. Censorship is, in the eyes of those who spend vast amount of time on the internet, or are quite invested in various forms on media, one of the greatest evils governments attempt to enforce upon its citizens. The philosophy of self-directed living is one that encapsulates the ideology that we are capable as human beings, and therefore capable of making

Censorship? It Doesn't Affect Me? Or I'm Not Into Any Of That Stuff. Am I Right?

1181 words - 5 pages According to the Oxford reference dictionary, censorship means the power to suppress parts of books, films, letters, news and etc. on grounds of obscenity, and risk to security. To our daily knowledge or in Laymen's terms, censorship is cutting out scenes that some of us do not consider to be violent or yet obscene and has always been done more towards the movies or the music that most of us listen to. 18SG, 18SX , is used in Malaysia for the

Was The Second Bombing On Nagasaki Necessary? List Three Reasons Why Or Why Not. I Said It Wasn't And Then Listed Three Reasons

844 words - 3 pages Japanese? The first question was whether or not to drop a bomb. The effects of atomic warfare had not been known and studied, but it was apparent that it would be a good tool in ending the war. The first bomb did appear necessary to ending the war. It would put Japan in check to bring a quick finish to the fighting, saving many lives, as well as prevent the Russians from joining the Pacific War. The second on Nagasaki, however, was obviously not. It