This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Certiorari To The Court Of Criminal Appeals Of Texas

3619 words - 15 pages

Smith v. Texas
Mark Anthony Bolden Jr.
2nd Period

I Introduction
LaRoyce Lathair Smith was convicted of capital murder and after some time being in court he was sentenced to death by a jury in Dallas County, Texas (Kennedy). This case deals with whether or not the death penalty should be nullified due to the jury’s improper instruction, how weak the two special issues are in certain cases, and since there was claim against constitutional error, there was no sign that he would cause future deliberate danger towards the public (Breyer). In 1991 the petitioner was convicted for viciously murdering one of his former co-workers ...view middle of the document...

Because of the failed objective, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals said that a person cannot get rid of his/her death sentence unless surmounting a Texas rule that is analogous federal rule. The Almanza v. State case made Texas adopt a rule stating that a criminal defendant who does not object to the jury’s instruction will not receive a reversal just because the instruction mistake was harmful. Instead, the defendant must meet a heightened standard, but if the standard is not met the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals will make the petitioner’s sentence stand (Kennedy).
Since the petitioners have not succeeded in raising the objection to the court’s attempt to help the federal defect, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals now has to use the strict Almanza rule, a rule that represents a state-law ground for decision (Kennedy).
During the trial Texas said that the jury had to answer two questions (sometimes three), these questions are known as the “special issues.” The questions that have to be answered in every court case are:
1. “If the behavior of the defendant that killed a person did it on purpose and whether that person expected to have his/her actions to cause death.”
2. “If the person that committed the violent crime has done this causing a continuous threat to the public.”
If all of the jury says that the defendant did indeed do both of these two things, then that person is given the death penalty, but if not that person is given a sentence of life in prison (Kennedy).
In the Jurek v. Texas case of 1976, the courts kept the facial constitutionality, but in the Penry case the (1)Eighth Amendment was violated because the evidence of Penry’s mental retardation and severe child abuse did not fit appropriately go with the “special issues.” Because of Penry’s mental retardation it was in question whether his actions were deliberate or not. The court wrote:
“In the absence of jury instructions defining ‘deliberately’ in a way that would clearly direct the jury to consider fully Penry’s mitigating evidence as it bears on his personal culpability, we cannot be sure that the jury was able to give effect to the mitigating evidence of Penry’s mental retardation and history of abuse in answering the first special issue. Without such a special instruction, a juror who believed that Penry’s retardation and background diminished his moral culpability and made imposition of the death penalty unwarranted would be unable to give effect to that conclusion if the juror also believed that Penry committed the crime ‘deliberately.’ Thus, we cannot be sure that the jury’s answer to the first special issue reflected a ‘reasoned moral response’ to Penry’s mitigating evidence.”(492 U. S., at 322–323)
Trials were held in 1991 after the first Penry case, but before the second Penry case (Penry v. Johnson), that was held in 2001.During the guilt phase, it was uncovered that the defendant committed an extremely vicious and callous murder. The former employee of a fast...

Find Another Essay On Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

The Effects of the Purposed International Criminal Court

1318 words - 5 pages measures when the rights of one of its citizens is being threatened by a foreign power. On that same note different end of the spectrum the U.S. sees it necessary to "police" the rest of the world, most of the time with out regard to foreign citizen's rights. Which is why former President Bill Clinton's signing of the purposed International Criminal Court treaty came as a surprise to the rest of the U.S. congress. On July seventeenth 1998 in

Singapore Court of Appeals Found ‘Nutello’ Guilty of Infringing ‘Nutella’ Trademark

650 words - 3 pages Singapore Court of Appeals found ‘Nutello’ guilty of infringing ‘Nutella’ trademark. Sarika Connoisseur Café (the Appellant) is the owner of the “TCC – the coffee connoisseur” café chain in Singapore. The Appellant came up with a new espresso-based drink called “Nutello”, in August 2007. The drink contained Ferrero SpA (the Respondent)’s chocolate-based hazelnut spread, sold under the trademark “Nutella” as one of its ingredients. Ferrero SpA

Appeals of the Smirnoff Vodka Advertisement

1228 words - 5 pages advertisement appeals readers by emphasizing the power needed to satisfy their desire for aggression. Moving further from the crowd of people, readers will discover the group of black oxen at the bottom, escaping in a hurry from the people with aggressed expressions. This picture is an epitome of the busy society and the oxen are the badges of the pressures that people bear everyday. Advertisers magnify the power of the people in order to

The history of Texas

968 words - 4 pages Texas history itself had its own amazing story. The small number of American settlers moved to the land of Texas had led to the dramatic war with the Mexicans. The land of Texas was used to be owned by Mexicans. Due to the argument between Texans and Mexicans caused the battle of San Jacinto and Mexican War. In long ago before American settlers moved to Texas, this place was so rich and an abundance of land. Spanish settlers have lived there for

Essay regarding the public's Misperception of the criminal court system and due process of the law

1916 words - 8 pages individual with a crime. Unfortunately, when you make it easier to prove guilt, then it becomes harder to establish innocence. (Overview of Criminal Procedure) The public may perceive that the ends justify the means and that the criminal procedure as it is written today may violate or deprive an individual of the constitutional rights. An example of one court case; U.S. vs. Dunnock, 295 f.3d 431 (4th Cir. 2002) Defendant, "by virtue of the fact he

The United States Lends Credibility to the International Criminal Court

1683 words - 7 pages The International Criminal Court (ICC), created in 1998 (Thayer and Ibryamova 2010), is responsible for investigating and prosecuting the most extreme cases, including crimes against humanity, aggressive crimes, war crimes, and genocide. The credibility of this institution, however, has been compromised due to the United States revocation of support and membership. Initially it is important to recognize the arguments against the United States

The United States Lends Credibility to the International Criminal Court

1607 words - 6 pages The International Criminal Court (ICC), created in 1998 (Thayer and Ibryamova 2010), is responsible for investigating and prosecuting the most extreme cases, including crimes against humanity, aggressive crimes, war crimes, and genocide. The credibility of this institution, however, has been compromised due to the United States revocation of support and membership. Initially it is important to recognize the arguments against the United States

Transfer to Adult Criminal Court

1025 words - 5 pages There are times where a juvenile may be eligible for transfer to adult criminal court. There are certain criteria that must be met for this to happen, and there is a strong belief that juveniles who commit serious offenses would be more appropriately dealt with by criminal (or adult) courts (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). Juveniles are capable of committing the same serious offenses that adults do. Therefore, with the requirements of a transfer being met

'Consider what you think are the key aims of a criminal trial and explain, with reasons, the extent to which you think the Crown Court or magistrates’

1689 words - 7 pages Within criminal court proceedings, there are two key aims that need to be upheld. Firstly, the trial should be fair, most importantly with respect to the consistency of judgments that are given for comparable offences; additionally, judges and juries must fully consider each case individually. Secondly, a judgment ought to come from a body that is representative of the local population; those making judgments should be without any prejudices

The International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Protection of Human Rights in Africa

1589 words - 6 pages 2 Introduction This essay will discuss the successes and challenges faced by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in prosecuting human rights violations cases in Africa. The ICC has been recently put under the spotlight by the African Union when it called for non-cooperation by its member states not to comply with the warrant of arrests that had been issued by the ICC against some of the leaders in Africa. This has created difficulties when

The Changing Demographics of Texas

1649 words - 7 pages warned that Republicans must court the Hispanic community or else, Republicans will no longer be in the majority in Texas. Obviously, winning the electoral college in Texas would make it easy for the winner of the contest to prevail, because of the ease with which candidate would reach 270, the number needed to win the election. Regardless of whether or not a candidate wins Ohio, Florida, and Virginia, without Texas it would simply be impossible

Similar Essays

The Effectiveness Of The International Criminal Court

2978 words - 12 pages There is a close relationship between human rights and criminal law. The scope of my paper will surround human rights and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in addition to human rights and international crimes. International criminal justice in this context speaks to those interested in prosecuting against the background of international human rights and humanitarian norms. The use of criminal law has many positive effects and pursues many

Overview Of The International Criminal Court

2602 words - 10 pages Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) is the permanent court made for the main purpose of dealing with criminal acts committed by individuals amongst a state in a bit to tamper with the territorial integrity of the state. The ICC has prosecuted altogether … cases; of which are war crimes, - are crimes against humanity, - concern crimes of aggression and – (few) were prosecuted for genocide. Dividing the essay into the four main

Subject: Negotiations Title: The Us Opposition To The Establishment Of International Criminal Court

2345 words - 9 pages IntroductionThe International Criminal Court is the very important institution, which should become the mean of struggling with such crimes as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, and many countries supported that idea, but the US took position against it. The aim of this paper is the application of several concepts from the course of the negotiation to the situation with the establishment of the International Criminal Court and the

Last Chance In Texas: The Redemption Of Criminal Youth

1912 words - 8 pages 1. Name and quick summary of book: Last Chance in Texas: The Redemption of Criminal Youth, by John Hubner, follows Hubner as he observes the “worst of the worst” juvenile offenders at Giddings State School. This treatment program is truly a “last chance” for may of the adolescents there – their last chance to change the direction of their lives before ending up in jail. Hubner takes the reader through a gripping and emotional journey as the