This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Character Analysis: King Lear

1637 words - 7 pages

The character King Lear represents an allegorical shift from the illiterate, Medieval Age to the literate, Renaissance Age. To illustrate this argument, King Lear needs to be read as a Renaissance play that occurred in a previous “imagined pagan time.” (Lawrence, Gods, 156) As a pagan king, Lear is seen in the realm of the Roman gods and their shame culture. The role of gods in Lear’s decision making are interwoven throughout the play as Lear tries to reconcile his humanity in relation to himself and the other characters, especially Cordelia. Specific to Lear, this reconciliation is an attempt to justify his actions and sense of his “nature” or humanity. While struggling with the vacuous ness of his beliefs, Lear progresses from a shame culture character at the beginning to a guilt culture character at the end of the play, ultimately finding his true nature in death.
The play opens with Lear dividing his kingdom between his daughters. Once Cordelia has offered her version of her love for her father, Lear begins invoking the Roman gods to rebuke her:
“Let it be so; thy truth, then, be thy dower:
For, by the sacred radiance of the sun,
The mysteries of Hecate, and the night;
By all the operation of the orbs
From whom we do exist, and cease to be” (Lr., 1.1.105-09)

In the article “’Gods that We Adore’: The Divine in King Lear,” Sean Lawrence argues Lear is still “worshipping” ancient gods. He continues to invoke Roman gods in Act 1:
“Lear: Now, by Apollo-
Kent: Now, by Apollo, King, Thou swear’st thy gods in vain. (Lr., 1.1.158-60)

A little later in the scene, Lear orders Kent “Away! By Jupiter.” (Lr., 1.1.178)
Lear, by appealing to the gods, is acknowledging his faith in an outdated, “shame culture” system of belief by invoking the ancient gods as justification for his actions.
Lawrence claims Lear “appropriate[s] the gods to his own purposes.” (Lawrence, Gods, 152) This appropriation leads to Lear’s psychological and spiritual destruction. Lawrence further argues the “sources of [Lear’s] self righteousness in defining the gods as a power that made himself, and to which he can appeal in asserting his own power, rather than as a source of judgment which stands over and against him.” (Lawrence, Gods, 152) Lear’s self proclaimed god-like stature causes him to create gods that are “only his [and] their failure to intervene on his behalf represents only the frustration of his will.” (Lawrence, Gods, 152) Lear, following this argument, represents a renaissance from shame to guilt culture. His gods have deserted him, leaving him nothing but his own humanity and the guilty knowledge that his pride in deposing Cordelia will lead to madness and death.
I agree with Lawrence’s interpretation. At the beginning of the play, Lear has an “Oedipus ness” that puts him within the realm of the shame culture of the Greeks and Romans and their gods. He’s similar to Oedipus: they both share the character trait of pride and a sense of being able...

Find Another Essay On Character Analysis: King Lear

Comparision of the tragic characters in Othello and King Lear in accordance with aspects of a tragic character

1842 words - 7 pages trumpets, signifying his importance. Furthermore, the language spoken by Lear and his daughters is high and courtly, as opposed to the prose spoken by other characters in the play. This language emphasizes the high rank of the king.Although Othello and King Lear are presented as men of high degree, they are both not perfect; each one possesses some traits that lessen their character. Othello is not all good or bad. He may be valiant and courageous, yet

“Each character in King Lear has control over their fate. The fate of each character is determined by the events that occur in act one of the play” - To what extent do you agree with this?

1006 words - 4 pages Chloe Stone"Each character in King Lear has control over their fate. The fate of each character is determined by the events that occur in act one of the play" - To what extent do you agree with this?Fate has proven to be a very important theme throughout many of Shakespeare's plays. In King Lear fate plays a particularly important role, as many critics would agree that the fate of each character is determined by events that occur in act one of

“Each character in King Lear has control over their fate. The fates of each character are determined by events which occur in the opening scenes of the play.” To what extent do you agree with this...

1317 words - 5 pages "Each character in King Lear has control over their fate. The fates of each character are determined by events which occur in the opening scenes of the play."To what extent do you agree with this statement?Freewill and fate are themes which are frequently discussed in reference to Shakespeare's plays. He often makes the audience wonder whether the characters ever had a choice in how their stories would end. King Lear's decision to abdicate the

Analysis of shakespeare's KING LEAR

1125 words - 5 pages King Lear, by William Shakespeare, is a tragic tale of filialconflict, personal transformation, and loss. The story revolvesaround the King who foolishly alienates his only truly devoteddaughter and realizes too late the true nature of his other twodaughters. A major subplot involves the illegitimate son ofGloucester, Edmund, who plans to discredit his brother Edgar andbetray his father. With these and other major characters in theplay

The Tragedy of King Lear Analysis

2197 words - 9 pages The Tragedy of King Lear Analysis Lear: By Jupiter, I swear no! Kent: By Juno, I swear ay. In The Tragedy of King Lear, particularly in the first half of the play, Lear continually swears to the gods. He invokes them for mercies and begs them for destruction; he binds both his oaths and his curses with their names. The older characters—Lear and Gloucester—tend view their world as strictly within the moral framework of the pagan

Analysis of William Shakespeare's King Lear

982 words - 4 pages In King Lear, William Shakespeare predominantly uses the two broad settings. These are the outdoor world and the indoor world. Inside the confines of walls it is Lear who holds power to do as he pleases, but outside the borders of brick and mortar, the very same man is at the mercy of Nature. Human hearts respond with hardness and devaluing ones self when given no love. Lear is one such character who due to family circumstances relies on his

Jacob's amazingly awesome king lear analysis

1227 words - 5 pages In the tragedy King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear, Goneril, and Edmund all undergo a change in their motivation by end of the play. Initially Lear is driven by his sense of emotion, which is evident through his biased decisions and declining mental state. However, in the end of the tragedy, Lear begins to accept his maddening state and realize the fault in his previous actions, thus resolving his his emotional issues by using more

King Lear and A Thousand Acres Comparative Literary Analysis

1819 words - 8 pages minor details have been changed to provide an intriguing new take on the same story. One such change is the fact the story goes from a third person view in King Lear, mostly following King Lear, to a first person narrative from the perspective of Ginny in A Thousand Acres. Ginny is the modern day version for Goneril’s character. King Lear and A Thousand Acres may take place in two different time periods; they both offer comments on the status of

An Analysis of Nature in Shakespeare's King Lear

3034 words - 12 pages An Analysis of Nature in King Lear The concept of Nature in Shakespeare's King Lear 1[1] is not simply one of many themes to be uncovered and analyzed, but rather it can be considered to be the foundation of the whole play. From Kingship through to personal human relations, from representations of the physical world to notions of the heavenly realm, from the portrayal of human nature to the use of animal imagery; Nature permeates every

Stories within Stories (An analysis of the narrative structure of Shakespeare’s King Lear & Much Ado)

860 words - 4 pages the wedding, the lovers and their friends decide to play a game. They want to get Beatrice and Benedick, who are clearly meant for each other, to stop arguing and fall in love. (Jensen) Both these examples show Shakespeare’s use of two stories in one. In addition, there is also a protagonist found in King Lear and Much Ado’s narrative structure. According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a protagonist is the principal character in a literary work

An Analysis of the Relationship between Goneril and Regan in King Lear

1521 words - 6 pages "An Analysis of the Relationship between Goneril and Regan in King Lear"******IB English year 1Ms. *****4 October 2008"An Analysis of the Relationship between Goneril and Regan in King Lear"The historical tragedy of King Lear by William Shakespeare revolves around deceit, tragedy, and violations of social statuses. King Lear lives in a time when offspring contrive against their fathers, friends become enemies, and even the most honesty of

Similar Essays

Character Similarity In Shakespeare's King Lear

1676 words - 7 pages There are billions of people in the entire world, however, chances such as certain individual shares the same personality, height, or hobbies of other people who live in the opposite extreme of the globe is ultimately bizarre. In a similar idea, a William Shakespeare’s play, entitled King Lear demonstrates the similarities of people, particularly through the work of relativeness that runs in blood. The play revolves around King Lear and his

Traglear Tragic Character In King Lear

945 words - 4 pages The Tragic Character in King Lear In William Shakespeare’s King Lear, the similar events that Lear and Gloucester experience result in a parallel plot sequence for the story. Lear and Gloucester are similar characters because they are experiencing similar problems while playing the role of a father. Their children also have a similar eagerness for power, a problem that both Lear and Gloucester should not have to deal with while addressing

The Development Of The Character Of King Lear

1597 words - 6 pages language with informality and lightheartedness, even when Kent risked the king' displeasure with the joke about Lear being poor, but Lear responds with good humor. There is the theme of the natural order being overturned when Oswald behaves insolently to Lear, he seems to be enjoying his rebellious role. He is seen as an evil character and he can easily defy Lear when provoked. The Fool makes his first appearance and comments on Lear's folly in

"What Do We Learn About The Character Of King Lear By The End Of Act1, Scene1 Of Shakespeare's King Lear"

672 words - 3 pages within their character. Again we see Lear fundamentally immature temperament. There is an irony Lear describing Cordelia as a "Scythian," a creature famous for its cruelty and evil, as Lear himself show these qualities to be rife within his own personality. His posturing as a king is in fact a façade attempting to hide the hurt and embarrassed old man within.Lear's decree to banish Cordelia and Kent, a faithful servant who merely seeks to