This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Chief Justice Taney And Slavery Essay

1922 words - 8 pages

The Art of Avoidance; Chief Justice Taney and the Question of Slavery

“Their present decision is equivalent to a repeal of law and the making of law. This is not adjudication, it is mere usurpation. It is the substitution of mere arbitrary will in the place of the solemn and responsible functions of an impartial judicature.”[1]

The 1857 Dred Scott decision proved that Chief Justice Roger Taney’s sadistic racism could be eclipsed only by his unbounded arrogance. Using outright lies regarding the intentions of the Framers, he temporarily sacrificed the entire African race, and directed the Supreme Court to move in and illegitimate and supercede the powers vested to Congress by the Constitution. Dred Scott brought the integrity of the court into question as Taney twisted and misrepresented precedent and the Constitution to fulfill the wishes of his own biased mind and those of his political party, leading one contemporary lawyer to ask, “If the opinions of these judges were as much calculated to do their party injury as they are to do it a benefit, do you, on your conscience, believe that those opinions ever would have been delivered?”[2] The opinion by Taney, and its’ outcome, were equally convoluted, and equally disastrous to many factions of Americans and the controversy it incited strongly contributed to divisions among the Democrats and Whigs that led to the 1860 Republican victory by Abraham Lincoln, and ironically the Civil War.

The first task the Court set out on was to bring into question the jurisdiction of Scott’s case under the Federal Courts, both the Supreme and the Circuit. Taney argued correctly that a case brought before a Federal Court must involve a discrepancy over Federal statute brought by citizens of the nation; in the case of Scott the question was whether his rights as a citizen had been denied by his continued slave status despite the fact that he had resided in a free territory, Illinois, for a number of years. Scott’s assertion was that he had become a free black as a result of his residency in Illinois, and as such he could legally sue for his freedom in the state of Missouri after his owner, John Sandford, “laid his hands upon said plaintiff, Harriet, Eliza and Lizzie, and imprisoned them, doing in this respect, however, no more than what he might lawfully do if they were of right his slaves at such times”.[3] Scott sought redress in the federal courts as a citizen of the United States, not as an abused slave, an important distinction.

According to the Constitution, only a citizen, as defined by the aforementioned document, could seek an audience with the federal court, but a slave was not considered a citizen, but property. Yet in an almost complete contradiction to himself on over question of the term citizen, Taney stated, “Undoubtedly, a person may be a citizen, that is, a member of the community who form the sovereignty, although he...

Find Another Essay On Chief Justice Taney and Slavery

Dred Scott Research Paper

2954 words - 12 pages nomination for President. Simon is the author of "Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney: Slavery, Secession, and the President's War Power”. He said ‘Taney, a political moderate who freed his slaves, had a remarkable life and, as chief justice, was revered by politicians and judges in both the North and the South before the Dred Scott decision came down”. Simon also suggested that if it weren’t for the Dred Scott case, Lincoln would

The Controversial Decisions of the US Government in History

4943 words - 20 pages actual constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise. On March 6, 1857, the nine justices filed into the courtroom in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, lead by Chief Justice Taney. Taney was almost 80 years old. Taney spoke the majorities opinion. Taney's opinion stated that Negroes, even free Negroes, were not citizens of the United States, and that therefore Scott, as a Negro, did not even have the privilege of being

The Abolition Movement of the 1850´s

946 words - 4 pages popular vote from the North and West, losing to Democrat nominee James Buchanan. In March 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Taney, declared that all blacks – slaves as well as free – were not and could never become citizens of America and therefore could not sue in Federal Court. The case before the Court was that of Dred Scott v Sanford. The U.S. Supreme Court held that Dred Scot, despite living in a free state, was

Dredd Scott Decision

2568 words - 10 pages . Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was to write a new opinion, which he delivered on March 6, 1857. In this case, Taney and six other justices declared Scott to still be a slave for several reasons. First of all, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was effectively declared unconstitutional because congress, according to Taney, did not have the power, under the Constitution, to abolish slavery in certain territories. Therefore, Scott had actually never been

Arguments for Slavery

841 words - 3 pages its people (Oppapers, 2011). In the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford, the debate centered on whether or not Mr. Scott be granted his freedom from slavery after his owner’s death because, in the course of his servitude, he had been transported by his owner to free territory where slavery was prohibited. The widespread notion was that “once free, forever free” (Tindall & Shi, 2010, p.460, para.5). Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of the Missouri

Abraham Lincoln and the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus

1000 words - 4 pages illegally arrested his political opponents. Approximately one month after the suspension, federal troops arrested John Merryman for recruiting and training a company for Confederate service in Maryland. The writ was suspended, and Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the man who delivered the Dred Scott Decision, was called to action. Taney ordered delivery of a writ of habeas corpus to the commander in charge of Merryman, but that commander denied it

How the Civil War affected the relations between the North and South/Contibutions to "Civil War"

562 words - 2 pages , specifically the nullification of the Missouri Compromise on constitutional grounds, were unlawful because they were not necessary for arriving at a decision in the case. They charged that after Chief Justice Taney had shown that Dred Scott, as a Negro, had no right to bring a case into a federal court, he should have ended his decision, instead of going on to declare that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. The "Dred Scott" decision also served

Dred Scott Case

939 words - 4 pages the nomination of Abraham Lincoln to the Republican Party in 1860. The decision read by Chief Justice Roger Taney in March 1857 stated that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. It also went further by declaring that the Missouri Compromise, which was agreed upon by both the North and the South, was unconstitutional in its restrictions of slavery in certain territories. As if the North wasn't agitated

From 1790 to 1857, the Supreme Court emerged as the most powerful branch of our government

1139 words - 5 pages had no standing as a citizen, and he can not appeal to the Federal government and he is to remain a slave. Chief Justice Taney went on to say Congress had no right to limit Missouri's right to allow slavery. I disagree with the decision but once again it shows you who has the authority to finally rule on important issues.(9)All of these decisions by the John Marshall court established the role the states and the Federal government would play. The

Short summaries on select important Supreme Court Cases

595 words - 2 pages state encroachments.7)Scott vs. Sandford 1857 - case involved Dred Scott, a slave, who sued in federal court for his freedom. Scott contended, in part, that he became free when he was taken into the free portion of the Louisiana territory where Congress had prohibited slavery. The Supreme Court dismissed the suit on jurisdictional grounds. Chief Justice Taney explained that the parties were not citizens of different states because the Constitution

Dred Scott v. Sandford

1089 words - 4 pages been appointed by pro-slavery presidents from the south, and 5 of these justices were from slave holding families. It was not until 1857 that Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, also a supporter of slavery, ruled that Mr. Scott should remain a slave. He also ruled that all people of African ancestry, free or slaves could never become U.S. citizens, and that the court also had no right to prohibit slavery in its territories. Southern slave owners

Similar Essays

The Nomination Of William Rehnquist To The Supreme Court And The Power Of A Supreme Court Chief Justice

1102 words - 4 pages law until the court itself reverses it and deems it unconstitutional. As one can see, the court has immense power and influence on the country and public policy. Consequently, the justices that make up the court, as individuals, heavily influence public policy. The court has seen as little as six and as many as ten justices serving at one time, including a Chief Justice. Often viewed as the embodiment of the court, the Chief justice's

The Dredd Scott Case Essay

2677 words - 11 pages series of opinions that Roger Taney, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and how we look at it. The court had announced its decision on March 6, 1857. By a 7 - 2 vote, the court ruled against Scott. Of the seven opinions written by the members of the majority, Chief Justice Taney’s is considered to present the forma; view of the Court, and I think that these are the most damaging statements in the case. Taney first dealt with the issues of whether

Dredd Scott Decision Essay

1752 words - 7 pages ruled in favor of Sanford but did not consider the larger issues of Negro citizenship and the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise. At first, Justice Nelson was chosen to present the majority opinion, but because he avoided the more controversial and important issues Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was named as the writer of the true majority opinion for the court. It was an opinion that would include everything under consideration in the

Slavery And The Constitution Essay

777 words - 4 pages the election of pro-slavery presidents. These presidents, in turn, selected pro-slavery judges who implemented Article III in pro-slavery ways. Even though the south had less than one third of the free population of the country, it had a majority in the Supreme Court by the 1860’s. Notably, Andrew Jackson, a pro-slavery president, appointed pro-slavery Roger Taney as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. In his notorious Dred Scott opinion of