This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Citizens United V. Fec: United We Stand, Corporations And All

1095 words - 5 pages

Introduction
In January of 2010, the United States Supreme Court, in the spirit of free speech absolutism, issued its landmark Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, marking a radical shift in campaign finance law. This ruling—or what some rightfully deem a display of judicial activism on the part of the Roberts Court and what President Obama warned would “open the floodgates for special interests—including foreign corporations—to spend without limit in…elections” —effectively and surreptitiously overturned Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and portions of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, struck down the corporate spending limits imposed by Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, and extended free speech rights to corporations. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief historical overview of campaign finance law in the United States, outline the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, and to examine the post-Citizens United political landscape.
Campaign Finance in the United States
During the Gilded Age—a period that began in the 1870s wherein the United States experienced tremendous economic growth—affluent industrialists such as John D. Rockefeller, Andrew W. Mellon, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J.P. Morgan, and Andrew Carnegie exercised, owing in large part to their wealth, enormous influence over the direction of American politics. Though left unaddressed during the Gilded Age, the issue of corporate involvement in political affairs was eventually identified as a corrosive problem in President Theodore Roosevelt’s 1904 State of the Union address. In his address, Roosevelt asserted that corporate spending in federal elections had the potential to engender corruption—or the appearance thereof—and should consequently be prohibited. Not long after Roosevelt delivered the address, Congress passed the Tillman Act in 1907, which proscribed corporations from making direct contributions to federal candidates. Four decades later, Congress passed Taft-Harley Act, which barred independent expenditures—or money spent on behalf of a candidate in a fashion that is unassociated with the candidate himself.
It was not until 1971, when Congress passed the Federal Election Campaign Act (which was later amended in 1974), that there began to be greater restrictions placed on campaign contributions and expenditures. The Federal Election Campaign Act, unlike previous campaign finance legislation, set explicit limits and disclosure requirements on campaign contributions and expenditures by political parties, individuals, and political action committees (otherwise known as “PACs”) and created and the Federal Election Commission as the chief organization responsible for enforcing the law.
These legislative measures were of course met with disapprobation from politicians. In 1976, two former senators, James L. Buckley and Eugene McCarthy, took issue with the Federal Election Campaign Act. The corollary of Buckley...

Find Another Essay On Citizens United v. FEC: United We Stand, Corporations and All

Korematsu v. United States Essay

1257 words - 6 pages not the case, as German and Italian Americans were also arrested. In the previous case Kiyoshi Hirabayashi v. United States which was about violating the curfew order imposed by executive order 9066. This case was referenced in the majority opinion for the reason that in Korematsu v. United States, we cannot judge the decision of military officers of the reasoning that the Japanese population on the west coast might not be loyal citizens of the

Korematsu V. United States Essay

1016 words - 4 pages final decision however stated that it was constitutionally fit to place Japanese Americans into internment camps.This case arose during the time of World War II. Japan was at war with the United States and there were uneasy feelings about the Japanese population in America. A presidential order was placed in 1942 by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to place all of those with "Foreign enemy Ancestry" be sent to internment camps. (Source A) The

Korematsu v. United States

1050 words - 4 pages of Japanese descent, Fred Korematsu. Justice Black stated in American Constitutional Interpretation, "In light of the principles we announced in Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), we are unable to conclude that it was beyond the war power of Congress and the Executive to exclude those of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war are." (pgs.1383-1384). Also, as in Hirabayashi, it could not be without reason that there were disloyal members of

Ohio V. United States

627 words - 3 pages compelling the accused to be a witness against himself.” Then, the court reasoned that the search was unreasonable “ab initio” and it makes it a violation of the fourth amendment. Justice Black mentioned in his concurrence that if something is obtained illegally, it cannot be used again the appellant. The Boyd’s case was not the only case mentioned in the Mapp v. Ohio opinion. Additionally, Weeks v. United States (1914) was a case that

United States v Jones

577 words - 3 pages Citation: United States v Jones/ United States courts of Appeals/ District of Columbia, 2012/132 S. Ct. 945 Facts: In 2004, the FBI initiated an investigation on Jones and other associates for a possible drug trafficking. During the investigation FBI agents obtained a warrant authorizing them to install a Global Positioning System tracking device on a Jeep, Jones used regularly. The warrant allowed agent to install the tracking device within

United States V. Microsoft

1224 words - 5 pages Charges raised by US Government against MicrosoftIn 1998, a case was filed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and twenty US States against Microsoft. The charges which were raised against Microsoft were:- That Microsoft Violated of section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in monopolization through a series of anticompetitive acts designed mainly to maintain its monopoly power (The acts related with web browsers and Java). Section 2 of

Citizens United: Limiting the Role of Government

2223 words - 9 pages the right to donate money to PACs and educating the people on a candidate’s values and beliefs. Corporations and unions sill cannot contribute directly to a candidate, but now can spent unlimited amounts on “education”. This overturned all of Austin v. Chamber of Commerce of Michigan and parts of McConnell v. FEC. They also ruled that money is a form of speech, and campaign speech (ads and speeches not directly supporting a candidate) is

United We Sit

1200 words - 5 pages country was attacked by terrorists, a wave of unity swept the nation. We all started to pitch in. For a short time, we forgot about our own self-interests and began to think of others. It would seem unity is one of a select few things that allow us to abandon our own desires for a time. We began to ignore our own wants and we instead focused on the needs of others. Unity calls for this! When disasters hit the United States, again we were unified

KOREMATSU V. the UNITED STATES

2148 words - 9 pages Constitution is to establish the basic and equal rights for all citizens of the United States. Belonging to a minority group based on culture, religion or race does not assert that one is unconstitutional. In times of war, evacuation of select minority groups only is NOT constitutional; however, evacuation of ALL US citizens for prescribed military areas is, warranted. In the months immediately following the Pearl Harbor attack the minority

Olmstead V. United States (1928)

688 words - 3 pages Olmstead v. United States (1928) Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Taft Vote: 5-4 Case reached Supreme Court by writ of certiorari. Facts:      The evidence in the records discloses a conspiracy of amazing magnitude to import, possess, and sell liquor unlawfully. Involved were not less than fifty employees, two sea-going vessels for transportation of the goods to British Columbia, a ranch beyond the city limits of

Case: Olmstead v. United States

745 words - 3 pages Olmstead v. United States (1928)Opinion delivered by Chief Justice TaftVote: 5-4Case reached Supreme Court by writ of certiorari.Facts:The evidence in the records discloses a conspiracy of amazing magnitude to import, possess, and sell liquor unlawfully. Involved were not less than fifty employees, two sea-going vessels for transportation of the goods to British Columbia, a ranch beyond the city limits of Seattle with a large underground cache

Similar Essays

United We Stand: Comparison Within Steinbeck's Literature

950 words - 4 pages the people, one of the main issues that he believed in was that a labor union was necessary to unite the workers and provide basic secure rights, such as a minimum wage. He demonstrates that idea with Jim Casy, a central character. Steinbeck's writing was to spread a belief he upheld strongly, so he proved his points by using realism.In another novel focusing on the down and out people of California, Cannery Row focuses on the actions of citizens

America The Beautiful, United We Stand, Divided We Fall

979 words - 4 pages should be considered hate crimes, and prosecuted as such. “Al Sharpton denounced the nationwide trend of knockout game stating the behavior by mostly blacks attacking white, jewish, and asian strangers is deplorable and must be condemned by all” (Lee). If we have any hope of engaging our most pressing problems, when it comes to what is ethically and morally acceptable, we should always stand up for what we believe is right no matter how many

We, The Corporations, Of The United States Of America

1613 words - 7 pages allow for any and every religion to affect all aspects of day-to-day life, including politics, sexuality, banking, business law, economics, as well as social issues. While freedom of religion is a coveted American ideal, the U.S. Constitution blatantly discourages religious participation in governance. Another important court case to understand is Citizen United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC). To summarize the case, Citizens United

United They Stand Essay

1117 words - 5 pages Fossil fuels provide the energy for almost everything we see and now they are running out. Now, many people race to find the one renewable resource that can fix everyone’s energy problem. There are now a multitude of renewable energy sources, but I believe that it will take a combination of the renewable energies to fix the energy crisis. The first main type of fossil fuel is coal. Coal is mostly carbon, so it creates a lot more CO2 than the