Civil Rights: Affirmative Action Essay

1449 words - 6 pages

In today’s society, the pressure to appear politically correct can play a major role in one’s social life. This pressure can even trigger people to support issues that are politically correct, such as affirmative action. Affirmative action is a highly controversial issue in the United States today, it has many supporters and it also has many detractors. This issue can separate many ethnic groups and even turn people of the same racial group against each other. There are many ideas that are thought of as a cure for racial inequality, but none fit the role better than affirmative action.
The roots of affirmative action may be traced back to the early 1960’s, during the Civil Rights Movement. It was in 1961 that President John F. Kennedy issued an Executive Order that first introduced affirmative action. This order included an establishment that government contractors “take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated fairly during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” (University of California Irvine) Over the years, there have been many adjustments to affirmative action, but they all reiterated the same general idea. This idea is that there would be equal opportunity for all qualified persons, and to take positive actions in order to ensure there would be equal opportunity for all. (University of California Irvine) Affirmative action has been successful, it has increased the number of recruiting and screening practices by employers, raised employers’ inclination to hire denounced applicants, increased the number of minority or female applicants and employees, and it increased the likelihood that employers will provide training and evaluate the employees. (Holzer and Neumark, 240) All in all, affirmative action will benefit those involved more than it will hurt them, because it provides opportunities for those who may not normally receive an opportunity.
Affirmative action works to eliminate racism, in particular structural and institutional racism. Structural racism entails the normalization and legitimization of an array of dynamics that routinely provide whites with advantages while producing cumulative and chronic adverse outcomes for people of color. (Good) It is a system of hierarchy that is primarily based on white supremacy, which gives white people power over all other races. Structural racism is all around, it is in history, culture, and interconnected with institutions and policies. Institutional racism on the other hand is discriminatory treatment, unfair policies and inequitable opportunities and impacts, based on race, produced and perpetuated by institutions. (Good) Institutional racism occurs when one person in an institution takes on the power of the institution and either promotes or harms other people based on race. Affirmative action works to eliminate these two types of racism, because affirmative action favors equality for all...

Find Another Essay On Civil Rights: Affirmative Action

Animosity and Affirmative Action Essay

622 words - 2 pages Affirmative Action are two words that can bring up an emotional debate on the validity of this policy. Affirmative Action are measures taken to allow minorities equal rights when it comes to being hired for a job or being promoted within a job. As it’s intended, Affirmative Action means that people from a particular group should enjoy special consideration or benefits when it comes to job placement. I’m going to use firefighting as an

The Future of Affirmative Action Essay

2051 words - 8 pages . People felt that Clarence Thomas may not be the best qualified (Jeffery, 230). Many minorities face similar situations when given an achievement. In addition to the fact that affirmative action may be harmful to minorities, many people argue that under the fourteenth amendment and the Civil Rights Act, equal opportunity for minorities is protected. Thus, affirmative action is not needed. Interest Groups that Support Affirmative Action

Should Affirmative Action be allowed in medical schools?

1131 words - 5 pages were not impartially qualified. The Public Civil Rights Agencies and Fair Employment denotes that the affirmative action procedures have the benefit of not only convincing employers not to discriminate when hiring or accepting, but to develop employment and educational opportunities for minority groups. Consequently, affirmative action is valid because it does decrease discrimination in the work place and correlated areas such as University

Affirmative Action is past its prime

1270 words - 5 pages repression during the onset of the United States, many of these attitudes have changed with the times. Affirmative Action can no longer be justified because more often than not, America is thought of as a “color blind society.” In addition, Affirmative Action violates the 14th Amendment in the Constitution, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by basing admissions and/or employment opportunities decisions on a person’s race. By allowing Affirmative

Affirmative Action and Racial Equality

1709 words - 7 pages the dreams and goals of all the individuals of minorities and provide an unfair opportunity that could even be compared to that of the civil rights period. No matter what skin color people have, people share similar dreams. With affirmative action, we have come a long way. However, we still see a strong need for it as discrimination still exists everywhere. (2) Evolution of the Controversy Furthermore, the root of affirmative action in the

Affirmative Action Promotes Discrimination in America

1927 words - 8 pages hard? Or make an extra effort? These attempts would obviously not be rewarded because of affirmative action. In turn, the groups benefiting from affirmative action are not driven to work hard, so the idea that success is based on work ethics can be ignored (Affirmative Action vs. Equal Rights 2003). The law also comes in to play when it comes to unfair employment. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that it is unlawful for an

Affirmative Action: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

1794 words - 7 pages action is a label for a large range of programs, but all of these methods began for one reason: as a way to fight racism. There were voluntary efforts and mandatory laws enacted in order to accomplish this feat (Wu par 6). It was begun under President Johnson with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and was followed by his Executive Order 11246, both of which emphasized the fair treatment and employment of minorities. Two years later, women were

Problems with Affirmative Action

741 words - 3 pages opposed to a stepping stone, will also aid in the decline of minorities, in the work force and everywhere else.      In the United States, promoting diversity in the workplace is becoming virtually impossible. Laws such as Tile VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the fourteenth Amendments were both created to protect the American people from discrimination on the grounds of race, creed, religion, sex and color. However; Affirmative Action was

Affirmative Action

1568 words - 6 pages Affirmative Action Affirmative action is one of the more recent and popular civil rights policies that affect today's society. Affirmative action can be described as nothing more than a lower educational standard for minorities. It has become quite clear that affirmative action is unfair and unjust. However, in order to blend race, culture, and genders to create a stable and diverse society, someone has to give. How can this be justified

Equal Employment Laws

1212 words - 5 pages benefit and justice. Affirmative action is a set of rule or public policy that was designed to eliminate present and past discrimination based on sex, gender, color, race, religion, or national origin. Civil rights programs were originally enacted to give rights to African Americans to become full citizens of America. Slavery was later made illegal in the thirteenth amendment. In the fourteenth amendment, citizens were ensured equal protection

The True Intention of Affirmative Action

604 words - 2 pages "I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: " We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal." Dr. King stated this in his famous " I have a Dream" speech in Washington, D.C. in 1963. Since the civil rights movement of the 1960s the idea of diversity has become increasingly more desirable. Diversity in an organization is required instead of just praised. Affirmative

Similar Essays

Civil Rights Law And Affirmative Action

1173 words - 5 pages “The term “affirmative action” was first introduced by President Kennedy in 1961 as a method of redressing discrimination that had persisted in spite of Civil Rights Laws and constitutional guarantees” (Brunner and Rowen, “A History and Timeline of Affirmative Action”). Then on September 24, 1965, affirmative action was enforced for the first time. “Issued by President Johnson, the executive order requires government contractors to “take

Affirmative Action In California: Has It Outlived Its Purpose?

1767 words - 7 pages . But today, some public agencies are questioning the meaning of affirmative action. The opponents of affirmative action believe that it encourages preferential hiring practices and reverse discrimination. They have also taken a strong stance towards the elimination of affirmative action through the California Civil Rights Initiative – Proposition 209 ( The supporters of affirmative action, however, still maintain that it is

Affirmative Action Essay

772 words - 3 pages Affirmative action- a plan to offset past discrimination in employing or educating women, blacks etc. (Websters New World Dictionary.)      The history of affirmative action has its roots in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and stems from the United States Supreme case of Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas. In 1965, President Linden B. Johnson issued Executive Order #11246 at Howard University that required

Affirmative Action Essay

946 words - 4 pages , education, and business from which they have been historically excluded” (Fullinwinder). Technically, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 prohibit preferential decision based on race and gender (Civil), yet affirmative action programs are still widespread. Most institutions employ an affirmative action program based on so-called “goals” (Fullinwinder). These goals, which are actually more like quotas, state how many