Clausewitz Essay

1538 words - 6 pages

Clausewitz


Clausewitz advocates attacking enemy “schwerpunkt” or centers of gravity. How does this compare with Sun Tzu’s prioritization for attacking important elements of national power? Which theorist provides the most useful guidance for determining the object of a strategy or strategies?
Introduction
Clausewitz’s attack of enemy centers of gravity and Sun Tzu’s prioritization of attack of important elements of national power provide contrasting approaches to the development of effective strategy. These contrasts are reflections of each author’s perspective on how war should be waged, the proper use of force, their definitions of the ideal victory and how best to achieve that victory as well as their methodologies, styles, and levels of analysis (Handel, p. 18-19). The understanding of these varying points of view enable us to better appreciate how each man arrives at his own unique solution to the common problem of identifying and overcoming the enemy’s most critical point.
Clausewitz’s Approach
Clausewitz uses systematic, empirical methods in arriving at his concept of the center of gravity being the critical strategic objective. This approach is both a product of his era, the age of enlightenment, where scientific thought was beginning to exert its primacy, as well as his view of war and how it should be waged. To Clausewitz war is armed conflict. It is “…an act of force to compel the enemy to do our will” and “…equips itself with the inventions of art and science.” (Clausewitz, p.75) Following his logical approach, if war is fighting, then war is waged according to Clausewitz, primarily by military means. All other means, such as diplomacy, are secondary and are not the concern of the military leader. (Handel, p. 19)
This narrow perspective on the waging of war by military means leads Clausewitz to focus his level of analysis on the operational level of war. It is here that the critical strategic objective must be found. Combining this perspective with scientific metaphors, he states that in keeping “…the dominant characteristics of both belligerents in mind. Out of these characteristics a certain center of gravity develops, the hub of all power and movement, on which everything depends. That is the point against which all our energies should be directed.” (Clausewitz, p. 595-596) By disrupting this center of gravity, the enemy is thrown off balance and if not allowed to recover, will, according to Clausewitz, eventually succumb.
Clausewitz’s Center of Gravity
In keeping with his focus on the military aspects of war, Clausewitz defines the enemy’s center of gravity as the enemy army. He supports this with historical reference to such great military commanders as Alexander, Gustavus Adolphus, Charles XII and Frederick the Great. Clausewitz states, “If the army had been destroyed, they would all have gone down in history as failures.” (Clausewitz, p. 596) Though he acknowledges other centers...

Find Another Essay On Clausewitz

To what extent has On War rendered nuclear weapons irrelevant - politics - essay

2945 words - 12 pages To what extent have nuclear weapons rendered On War irrelevant? Introduction Prussian general, Carl Von Clausewitz’s doctrine ‘On War’ was first published in 1832 and yet scholars today argue ‘Clausewitz’s theory of war is as timeless as the phenomenon of war’ (ref). Thus, despite the development of nuclear weaponry, Clausewitzian thought remains relevant and hence, timeless. However, 113 years after Clausewitz published his work came the first

New and Old Wars Essay

2081 words - 9 pages (Clausewitz, 2007, p. 13). In principle, new wars are synonymous to conventional warfare in which the contemporary conventional military armament and combat tactics are no longer utilized in open confrontation between interstate conflicts (Duffield, 2005, p. 25). Many theorists have considered what used to define war and the contemporary worldviews on new wars. One of such thinkers is Mary Kaldor, who explicated the effects of globalization to war

Analysis Of Clausewitz's Interrelationship Between

1032 words - 4 pages Carl von Clausewitz is widely acknowledged as the most important of the major strategic theorists.This essay will attempt to analyze Clausewitz's interrelationship between "political object" and that of "military object", and how these concepts fit into his general ideas on war as outlined in Book One of On War.Before getting into the theoretical meanings of "political object" and that of "military object" I find it helpful to review the

Clausewitz's "On War": Useful Insights for Twenty-First Century Warfare

1386 words - 6 pages Amongst military theorists and practitioners who studied war, its origin and implications, Carl von Clausewitz assumes a place among the most prominent figures. With his book On War, he demonstrated his capability to provide thorough historical analysis of the conflicts he experienced, and as a philosopher he reflected on war itself. Today, Western armies conduct warfare in a dynamic environment composed of multiple threats in which civilians

How Do Military Historians Explain War?

2604 words - 10 pages determinants of warfare rather than the political and economic. Often times he argued for the dominance of the West by way of Karl von Clausewitz. An intellectual mind out of the nineteenth-century, Clausewitz authored an often-misunderstood dictum, "war is the continuation of policy by other means.” Clausewitz theorized the importance of warfare in a sense of politics, resources, and traditional warfare between opposing armies and visible

How Do Military Hilitorians Explain War?

2606 words - 10 pages on the cultural determinants of warfare rather than the political and economic. Often times he argued for the dominance of the West by way of Karl von Clausewitz. An intellectual mind out of the nineteenth-century, Clausewitz authored an often-misunderstood dictum, "war is the continuation of policy by other means.” Clausewitz theorized the importance of warfare in a sense of politics, resources, and traditional warfare between opposing

"The Strategy of a warrior state: Rome and the wars against Carthage, 264-201 B.C."

2162 words - 9 pages INTRODUCTIONThis critical paper will review Bernstein's case study as it relates to the theoretical frameworks set out in Clausewitz, Corbett, Mahan and Sun Tsu. Certain critical elements of strategy as identified by the classical strategists noted-above will be selected and analyzed within the context of the Punic War. The selected elements of strategy are as follow: (1) strategic assumption, (2) strategic center of gravity and policy match, (3

It is a combined effort of compare/contrast Sun Tzu and Carl von Clausewitz's philosophies and how they apply to America's current War on Terrorism stance

6734 words - 27 pages relationshipspage 6America's Clausewitz-tzu-clausewitz themespage 7Power of Resistance - 9-11 becomes the American resolvepage 10Schwerpunkt - the transition to the counterattack the enemyPage 11Sun Tzu - and the art of "non"warpage 13Why Tzu? -the courses of action that allowed America's pursuit of Sun Tzupage 14Victory Essentials and OODA loops - point takenpage 16Enter von Clausewitz -shelving of the Art of Warpage 174GW, conventional war, and the new

Reasons On Why Napoleon Had Lost The Campaign Of 1812

1138 words - 5 pages von Clausewitz and Brett James, show similarities in reasons why Napoleon had lost this campaign to Russia.Napoleon believed that after a few quick victorious battles, he could convince Alexander to return to the Continental System. He also decided that if he occupied Moscow, the Russian government would crumple and ask for peace." A single blow delivered at the heart of the Russian Empire, at Moscow the Great, at Moscow the Holy, will instantly

What If the Allies Had Invaded France in 1943?

2478 words - 10 pages favorable geopolitical terms for the British and Americans. I. THE TIME IS RIGHT The comparison of German forces in France in 1943 versus 1944 provides a compelling argument that allied forces should have transitioned from defense to offense at a decisive point in Western France. Clausewitz states that, “A sudden powerful transition to the offensive - the flashing sword of vengeance - is the greatest moment for the defense” (Clausewitz, 370

Lessons To Be Learned From the Study of Warfare

1457 words - 6 pages irregular wars demand frequent deployments that put a strain on military units almost to the brink of their culmination point. History shows that tenacity is a virtue especially when reviewing the military careers of Antoine de Jomini and Carl von Clausewitz. Both men, well known military theorists, spent the sum total of their careers in quest of the highest ranks of military service. Jomini’s tenacity mainly driven, perhaps, by his personal

Similar Essays

Carl Von Clausewitz Essay

1135 words - 5 pages Carl Philipp Gottfried von Clausewitz was born June 1, 1780 in Burg bei Magdeburg, Prussia. Drawing from influences such as his professor of theology grandfather as well as philosopher Immanuel Kant, Clausewitz is regarded as a very experienced military strategist and the father of war philosophy. Due to my Army ROTC commitment and future career path, I chose him to suit my interests and aspirations. He grew up as the youngest son of a middle

Carl Von Clausewitz Essay

2326 words - 9 pages Question 6: Clausewitz wrote “in war the result is never final.” Under what conditions and through what actions can belligerents make their victory more permanent? Carl Von Clausewitz theorized that “in war the result is never final” and that “the defeated state often considers the outcome as a transitory evil…” (Clausewitz, 80) There are many examples that support his theory that defeated belligerents will wait for another opportunity to

Antoine Henri De Jomini Vs Carl Von Clausewitz

2936 words - 12 pages It is interesting and even surprising that the two major strategies regarding war were developed by European contemporaries of the late eighteenth and nineteenth century. Antoine Henri de Jomini (1779-1869) approached his philosophy of war in a structured, scientific manner. Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) took a more fluid, open-ended approach to his philosophy of war. The fact that they lived during the same time period in Europe is also

General Carl Von Clausewitz: A Past Military Enthusiast That Contributed To The Ideals Of The Present

1055 words - 4 pages . Past philosophers, theorists, idealists have all been responsible for having an immense affect on today’s military leaders. By learning from the earlier ideas of military philosophy, the decisions made in today’s chaotic warfare are strengthened. General Carl von Clausewitz is such a past military enthusiast that contributed to the ideals of the present. Carl von Clausewitz was born in 1780 at Burg. He eventually entered the Prussian Army in