This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Clear And Present Danger Essay

6647 words - 27 pages

Introduction.Clear and Present Danger is the restriction of the right of free speech when it is deemed to have a clear and present danger and affect upon people. Throughout history, the affect of clear and present danger is evident. What Supreme Court cases in history have had a substantial bearing on clear and present danger? What programs have been implemented by the government to mitigate instances of clear and present danger in the United States? What action has congress taken to pertaining to surveillance of suspected offenders? The answers to these questions will be covered in detail and enable us to truly understand the affect that clear and present danger has had on our country.Debs v. United States - an example of Clear and Present Danger.Eugene Debs was a socialist who made two public speeches denouncing capitalism and World War I and promoted socialism. In 1918, Debs speech "Socialism is the Answer," given in Ohio before twelve hundred persons consisted of remarks such as "I might not be able to say all that I think, but you need to know that you are fit for something better than slavery and common fodder." The Supreme Court used its clear-and-present-danger test to ascertain whether this speech had a bad tendency. (Linder, 2003)During the speech, the growth of Socialism and its success being prophesized was the main theme. He began his speech by stating that he had just returned from a visit in the workhouse where three of his friends were paying a penalty because of their devotedness to the working class community. The three friends were Baker, Wagenknecht and Ruthenberg. In the case of Ruthenburg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 Sup Ct. 168, Ruthenberg was convicted of aiding and abetting another in failing to register for the draft. In his speech, he mentioned that he was proud of those persons that paid the penalty for standing up to improve the conditions for all mankind. He went on by expressing opposition to Prussian militarism, which insinuated that he felt likewise about the United States. He praised the loyalty to Socialism of Kate Richards O'Hare who was convicted of obstructing the enlistment service. Debs said that O'Hare was convicted based on false testimony. He said that the master class of people always declared the war and the subject class of people always fought the battles with nothing to gain and everything, including their lives, to lose. He went on by stating that the working class never had a voice in declaring war and in declaring peace. In his words, "You have your lives to lose; you certainly ought to have the right to declare war if you consider war necessary." Debs illustrated the growth of Socialism, the prophecy of the international Socialist crusade of continuing to sustain success, and the glorification of minorities. However, Debs did not feel that his speech obstructed war. He had adopted an "Anti-War Proclamation and Program" in April of 1917 in St. Louis. (FindLaw, 2004)During the early 20th...

Find Another Essay On Clear and Present Danger

Essay: I had to write an essay about a conflict in my life, and how I handled it. If it was overcome or not. I also had to present a clear thesis in my essay

529 words - 2 pages One Family, Two SocietiesGrowing up in a Pakistani household I was expected not to question or disrespect my father in any way. My father who was raised in Pakistan was a stern man, and stubborn at that. My father and I never really talked about anything serious. There came a point where I started to think and express my own opinions, which were different from what my father had. Over the past year I had become more independent of my father due

The Supreme Court in American Politics

1386 words - 6 pages prominent Supreme Court Cases in the arena for Freedom of Speech is Schenck v. United States (1919), in which the idea of “clear and present danger” was formulated. Charles Schenck and his fellow defendants were convicted under a federal criminal statute for attempting to disrupt World War I military recruitment. They were distributing leaflets claiming that conscription was unconstitutional. The federal government believed that this behavior

The Sedition Acts: Was Eugene Debs Rightly Convicted?

1859 words - 7 pages posed a “clear and present danger” to the country under a precedent established months before in Schenck v. United States. The precedent from the related Schenck v. United States trial has essentially been overturned by the Supreme Court in later decisions, and although many aspects of the Sedition Act were later repealed and are now considered unconstitutional, I will focus my arguments on why I believe the Supreme Court wrongly affirmed

First Amendment

1341 words - 5 pages have all the effect of force.” The “clear and present danger” rule came out of this. He also wrote “Circumstances that would create a clear and present danger, Congress has a right to prevent…. When a nation is at war many things that mighty be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right

Oliver Wendell Holmes and Free Speech

3577 words - 14 pages , goes as follows, “The question in every case, is whether the words are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about subsequent evils that congress has a right to prevent” 249 U.S. 47. Legal scholar Zechariah Chafee, in his article “Freedom of Speech in War Time,” writes that the clear and present danger test is a “good” test for future free speech cases. Chafee is

Important Cases Of The Us Supreme Court

731 words - 3 pages party, had been convicted of sending some 15,000 strongly worded leaflets to men who had been called to military service, urging them to resist the draft. The issue in this case was the individual rights of expression and speech against the needs of society. In this case a very important precedent was set the idea of "clear and present danger" which states that when words are in such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that

Violations in the Rulings of Schneck v. United States

1047 words - 5 pages The Schenck case in the early 1900s dealt with the freedom of speech as it related to the draft of World War I. Charles Schenck sent mass mail that stated “the draft was a monstrous wrong motivated by the capitalist system” (Schenck v. United States). The federal government found this to be in violation of the Clear and Present Danger Test as well as the Espionage Act and arrested Schenck for his actions. The case proceeded to the Supreme Court

Limiting of Civil Liberties

1005 words - 4 pages show that the forbidden conduct would substantially interfere with appropriate school discipline.So you can clearly see, that the crutch of each of these cases is whether it poses a "clear and present danger", as with our current situation a danger is posed, but this danger is not posed by American citizens, generally speaking of course. In the time just after September 11th, the government along with the FAA posed mandated passenger checks. After

Global Warming

504 words - 2 pages to reach a level of certain danger. However, within this treaty there is no specific definition of danger. This lack of a clear description of danger has led to one failed conference, Kyoto, and hundreds of countries, scientists, and policymakers to attempt an agreement on the level of damage caused by global warming.      Recently, many countries have requested a definition of unacceptable risk by measuring and comparing the change in average

Thematic Essay

1046 words - 5 pages . Also, after the case the "clear and present danger" test was introduced to test when speech is not protected. This test was to used to decide whether something said created a clear and present danger and if so, it would not be protected under the First Amendment and would be subject to becoming a threat to security. An example of this can be seen when saying “Fire!” in a public place, screaming “Fire!” would be a clear and present danger because

Kino’s Songs

1235 words - 5 pages arm and flung the pearl with all his might” (Steinbeck 89-90). This shows how much of a hold the pearl had had over his personality and also how quickly he went back to being the person he was before he found the pearl, the kind that does not punch his wife in the face. The Song of Family represents the balance of Kino’s life. The Song of Enemy is heard when Kino feels he is in danger or in the presence of an enemy. It is present in the

Similar Essays

Clear And Present Danger Essay

1292 words - 5 pages Betrayal, corruption, drugs, and a chaotic power struggle were the key elements used to make Tom Clancy's "Clear and Present Danger" a political history lesson. It closely examines the inner workings of our so called "ideal" government as it portrays a side where bureaucrats, including the President himself, are blundering in their decisions and concerned only with keeping their good names untarnished. Their true source of power is how the

Clear And Present Danger: Book Review

1874 words - 7 pages Clear and Present Danger: Book Review The book ‘Clear and Present Danger’ is a novel written by Tom Clancy in 1989 and published in 1990 by Thorndike-Magna Publisher (Beetz 824). This book has one thousand one hundred and forty pages, with the latest edition published by Berkley Books having six hundred and eighty eight pages. This novel like most of Clancy’s writings relies on a basic formula of good versus evil where the United States is

Clear And Present Danger Determines If Speech Causes Violence

1154 words - 5 pages 1) The various tests the government has come up with are the “bad tendency”, “clear and present danger”, and “direct incitement” tests. Bad tendency test is to determine when speech has a tendency to induce illegal behavior but does not directly encourage the behavior or tell people to do anything. Clear and present danger is used to determine if speech actually has the capability and will cause violence or cause people to do something illegal

Cell Phones For Children: A Clear And Present Danger

1591 words - 6 pages a cell phone a parent can send reminders to a child, or call to confirm medication have been taken. Cell phones also provide a way for children to keep constant communication between family members. By using cell phones, families can coordinate after school activities, and by sharing online calendars, which can cut down on over scheduling issues. When parents use GPS technology they are able to improve the way they are able to connect