Cloning Argument Essay

1363 words - 5 pages

Cloning: Choice is Ethical
Thousands of people a year are placed on the organ donor's list. Thousands of people a year are diagnosed with diseases that are dubbed fatal unless a transplant or transfusion is given. This has created a large demand for some alternative method to the present donor practice. Research in the "taboo" science of cloning seems to provide a viable method in which to aid the problem aforementioned and many others as well. But is it ethical?
Cloning technology is expected to aid the result in several medical breakthroughs. It is thought that there may one day be a cure for cancer. This is because the cloning process helps us understand the process of cell differentiation. Theories exist that if a cure for cancer can be found, then further testing may lead to a cure for heart attacks and cloning organs for organ transplantation. Scientists believe that they may be able to treat heart attack victims by cloning their healthy heart cells and injecting them into the areas of the heart that have been damaged (Smith). The cloning of organs would eliminate individuals waiting on a list for an organ transplant. Skin for burn victims, brain cells for the brain damaged, spinal cord cells for quadriplegics and paraplegics, hearts, lungs, livers, and kidneys could be produced or regenerated. This could provide a means for suffering patients in desperate need of a transplant, which also eliminates the risk of rejection, for these new organs will be compose of their own tissue (Garg).
Human cloning though, has always been an issue of controversy, be it in terms of its ethics or religious reasoning, and there are many who will counter these ideas at any means to see it not happen. They would argue that it is not our right to dabble in such research, but why not? In a science where the possibilities for good are endless and many lives can be saved why not? Others counterarguments may include the worry that there would be no line drawn, cloning would go too far. For example, in this war, would it be ethical to clone "soldiers"? Creating an army to win a war, using these "soldiers" as a type of disposable robot to fight and help win. This can also be called the 10,000 Hitler objection, since it is most commonly stated as fear that someone would use the technology to create an army of Hitlers. It's a fear generated from too much bad science fiction (Hume).
Cloned soldiers would still have to be carried to maturity by an army of mothers, and raised by an army of nannies and teachers. It would still take about two decades to come up with the first batch of useful soldiers or slaves.
Even then, getting the clones to all believe the same thing would be impossible. Neither knowledge nor experience can be cloned, and knowledge and experience heavily influences what type of person we become. To hear some people speak, one would think that Hitler's clones would all grow up speaking German regardless of the language...

Find Another Essay On cloning argument

The Argument For And Against Cloning

867 words - 3 pages have the same genes as their single parent. Simply speaking, clones are identical copy of their parents.About five years ago, on February 12th 1997, an event in genetic history occurred which changed our prospective of what we know as "reproduction". A new element was introduced by the birth of a unique sheep named Dolly. After this event, and many more coming afterwards including cloning of animals and plants, a question lingers in minds of

[LEGAL STUDIES]Discuss the issues surrounding IVF surrogacy and cloning, showing both sides of the argument and also at the same time, give your opinion

1818 words - 7 pages IVF, surrogacy, cloning and genetic experimentation are reasonably recent ideas and technologies that can certainly be improved on and explored further. But is it really the path the human race wants to take? Children being born to one mother and taken care of by another? Two people exact copies of each other? Living beings being altered from their natural form for the sake of our comfort and lifestyle? Raising our children in machines?We have

The Ethics of Cloning

1717 words - 7 pages potentially life changing science will be examined. Along with this we will take a close look at the arguments against cloning and exploring the flaws within the argument. This will affirm that cloning is useful because it cures diseases, passes on genes, and repopulates endangered species. In order to have a legitimate argument for the reasoning why cloning is or is not acceptable it is important first to be understand what exactly the topic

Cloning: The Face of a Better Tomorrow

3082 words - 12 pages the commander and chief of the country believes something then almost certainly others will follow and start to believe the same thing. An argument against cloning states that the act of cloning is like,”...humans taking into their own hands the future of the human race”(U*X*L Encyclopedia of Science). The political argument against cloning is explained as;”...genetic engineering can, and has, led to discrimination against those who do not fit in

Human Cloning Examines the issue human cloning. Debates the pros and cons and the ethical issues surrounding the procedure. Describes political efforts to outlaw the process

1198 words - 5 pages ; the technology used to make an organism that has the exact same DNA as another organism. This is the type of cloning that was used to create Dolly, the first mammal successfully cloned. There are different groups worldwide that want human reproductive cloning banned, such as the ABC (Americans to Ban Cloning), and naturally, the Catholic Church. But with any argument, there's a side in support of this touchy and controversial subject. Groups like

Human Cloning

932 words - 4 pages Opponents of cloning believe that the procedure of cloning has not been proven safe at all, while those who support cloning believe the cloning of humans could be used to solve human diseases and infertility. However, both sides may agree that human cloning may help in our new era. Human cloning has been successful and has had failure at times as well. The proponents of human cloning could be broken down into two arguments. The first argument

Should Human Cloning Be Pursued?

1209 words - 5 pages an alternative to organ donation. It is less likely to result in rejection by the recipient because the tissue would be made from the recipients own genetic material. Like stated previously, therapeutic cloning does not involve the creation of a live human being. However, despite the benefits of therapeutic cloning, there are huge controversies surrounding the topic. One argument against therapeutic cloning is that creating stem cells on a

What about Cloning?

751 words - 3 pages offspring for food. The moral issue of cloning is, in my opinion, the biggest one. Do we have the right to play God? I understand the usefulness of cloning plants for food usage but I strongly do not believe that we have the right of creation in cloning humans. This argument will obviously become a larger issue as the process of cloning gets perfected. Very good. I learn from each of your papers – I hope you are learning too.

The Role of DNA in Cloning

833 words - 3 pages argument will be based upon cloning being an experiment, where God had created everyone with no doubt in this person will be complete or not. The reason why I brought in religion is because no matter where science reaches, religion will most likely interfere. In Islam, cloning is strictly forbidden. We, as humans, get reproduction started, but God is the one who finishes it. I strongly believe God breathes life into each person not science

Cloning is Ethical and Necessary

1258 words - 5 pages 2001 prohibits any person or entity from knowingly preforming, participating, or attempting human cloning (“H.R. 2505…” 1). The main argument against cloning is religion. One of the main arguments against cloning is that, to certain people, it is seen as unethical, people think this because it took 300 attempts to make Dolly, the sheep. If the procedure did not go as planned, what would happen with the mistakes? Cloning is against many peoples

The controversy over cloning

2551 words - 10 pages argument against reproductive cloning addresses the possibility that men will no longer be required to procreate. Reproductive cloning utilizes unfertilized eggs from a female, as well as DNA from any person, male or female. It would then require implantation into a uterus to develop to full term. This argument is based on the assumption that asexual reproduction will be the preferred method of procreation. It assumes that women would choose this

Similar Essays

Argument For Human Cloning Essay

2277 words - 9 pages has to be obtained by the destruction of an embryo. Until an alternative is found, Cloning research should not be banned. Argument Point 2 Ancestors such as the Neanderthal, an extinct species of genus Homo sapiens, with a prominent brow bridges, a preceding forehead, and have been considered the closest species to modern human. They are classified as neanderthalensis. They thrive in the time of Pleistocene Epoch throughout Europe, Asia, and

Argument Against Human Cloning Essay

2467 words - 10 pages cloning proposes many arguments for each opposing side and can greatly impact the modern world based upon the research obtained through it. Whether or not that research is morally and ethically correct is the topic of most discussions in the genetics field. Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C

Argument Against Cloning Essay

960 words - 4 pages Human cloning has always been an issue of controversy, both religiously and ethically. Should a person be cloned for the sake of experimentation? Should a species be cloned in order to reproduce organs? Intense questions have been asked since the discovery of cloning, however the most controversial question is: is cloning right? The cloning of any species, whether human or not, is ethically and morally wrong.The process of cloning inevitably

"Men Without Hats: To Clone Or Not To Clone". A Pro Argument For Cloning, Arguing Against Charles Krauthammer M.D.'s Views On Cloning

981 words - 4 pages Hats: To Clone or Not to Clone?----------------------------------------------"To clone or not to clone?" is the question of this argument. This conquest has been the aspiration of many scientists for hundreds, perhaps thousands of years. On the other hand, it is the fear of many religious/paranoid people everywhere. By us determining the value of human life; this will dictate the future of cloning indefinitely. I feel Krauthammer's opinion is