A writer's mind should not take on blame for a bad example of writing. The writer’s opinion should always be valued. Perfectly acceptable as it may be to label a writer’s facts or information as incorrect, to point out a writer's own opinions, thoughts, views, or takes on a subject as incorrect displays a failure to connect with the writer. When a writer expresses their opinion openly and in return, a professional labels the piece as a display of close-minded thinking and badly argued writing, it would be wise to search within the words themselves to uncover a hidden voice or manner in which the author wrote them. This particular teacher does not deserve a pass for his criticisms, instead, chastised for a lack of understanding on where the writer comes from. Still, the writer makes the error in assuming an absolute moral to which all should acknowledge exists.
One could in fact point out that the High School teacher displays close-minded thinking. Perhaps the writer comes from a background in which his parents from very early on instituted the opinion of homosexuality as being immoral. After all, our parents, peers, and tutors are responsible for instilling upon us our basis for moral understanding. While we all might not agree in full with them, they do have at least a slight impact on how we view the world. Consider, for example, Sarah Vowell and her relationship with her father in Shooting Dad. Sarah managed to be in complete disagreement with her father on many issues at a young age; guns were the primary example given to emphasize this. Sarah grew up with a belief that she did not take after her dad, yet in the end, she opened her eyes, thus revealing the similarities of character between them. “Oh. My. God. My dad and I are the same person. We are both smart-alecky loners with goofy projects and weird equipment. And since this whole target practice outing was my idea, I was no longer his adversary. I was his accomplice. What’s worse, I was liking it.” (Vowell 33). Sarah might not have taken on her father’s love of guns, but she did come to realize that her basic characteristics mirrored those of her father’s. If the writer’s family imposed a feeling of hostility towards homosexuals on him, then his views and opinions on a supposed “moral absolute” would reflect this. I would have to point out to the teacher that this writer has probably had a certain view on homosexuality from a very young age due to his upbringing, and that his labeling of others who do not share his view as ignorant, results from a product of his own ignorance.
The teacher should receive no blame for being in disagreement with the student, for if I defend the writer’s opinion on a basis of moral understanding brought on by parents, then I must also defend the teacher’s opinion. The teacher appears up in arms due to the writer’s lack of toleration for other’s moral opinions, and rightfully so. When claiming there to be...