In his short paper Phillips (2010), attempted to explain the development of the use of observation by the research industry and the way the industry has begun to self-regulate themselves in order to maintain public confidence. With the various methods of collecting scientific research data coming under scrutiny when it involves researching the human, it is only logical that with the advancement of the internet and how humans use it, that internet research should also fall within these guidelines.
Over the years, researchers have tried to link stress to several studies and Skakon et al. 2010 in their conclusion found limited support for the proposition that leader stress and well-being is associated with employee stress and well being. While formulating my research problem I had listed stress as a criteria to investigate further as it relates to organizational leaders and employees, upon reviewing the questions below and completing my homework assignment I can safely say the question I had in mind is of no value to my research.
Naturalistic Observation and Data Collection
Naturalistic observation is where one or more observers in a specific research environment, observes behavior, and records their findings in a reliable manner. In layman’s terms, this is called field observation and researchers must take great care not to alter or influence the behaviors they are observing. Once a researcher decides to conduct his/her research using the naturalistic observation method they will be observing the respondents in their natural environment.
Data collection takes place where the behaviors of the observant typically occurs, these studies tend to be generalizable to other populations, human or animal. Naturalistic observation data are collected visually and the observation involves watching the observant in his or her natural environment, such as at home, or playground in the case of naturalistic observation of children and recording what the children are doing. For example, watching a group of children playing on a swing for five minutes and documenting how the children interact with each other or the adults around them. Naturalistic observation studies have a high external validity, for example, children in a playground in Memphis are likely to behave the same way as children in California. The researcher must ensure that the data they collect can be both qualitative and quantitative in nature.
Naturalistic Observation Data is Primarily Qualitative
Thinking about the goal of naturalistic observation and understanding behaviors in a natural setting, this research is to understand a phenomenon from the point of view of the observer,nott the researcher, that means that the quality of the attribute is more important than howmuchy experience the attribute. The method in which the data are collected such as interviewing, watching and observation tends to produce results from unique individuals, mostly describing an event or feeling...