This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Commentary Of Evil In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part X

861 words - 4 pages

In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part X, Philo have questioned how it is possible to reconcile God's infinite benevolence, wisdom, and power with the presence of evil in the world. “His power we allow is infinite: whatever he wills is executed: but neither man nor any other animal is happy: therefore he does not will their happiness. His wisdom is infinite: he is never mistaken in choosing the means to any end: but the course of Nature tends not to human or animal felicity: therefore it is not established for that purpose.” (Hume, 87) Given the presence of evil, we must either conclude that God wishes to prevent needless suffering, but cannot, in which case God is not all-powerful, or we may admit that he does not wish to prevent evil in which case we may conclude that God is not infinitely benevolent. Or, alternatively, we can conclude that he both wishes and can prevent evil, but that he is not wise enough to know how to arrange the world so that there is no evil, in which case he is not infinitely wise.
Philo’s argument of the incompatibility of God’s existence with the existence of evil is valid, because of the following:
Philo’s argument has the premises which are God is infinitely wise, powerful and benevolent is true. The existence of evil shows God must lack either infinite benevolence or powerful or wisdom. If we assume these premises are true, then the conclusion God does not exist is true. A valid argument is one on which, if we assume the premises are all true, the conclusion must be true. Therefore it is a valid argument.
It is an unsound argument, because the premises of this argument are not true in fact: the existence of evil cannot show that God must lack either infinite benevolence or powerful or wisdom. Because if God is infinitely perfect, which means he has power and wisdom to make the world that non-existence of evil, and he is benevolently want make the world that non-existence of evil, but God is possible have good reasons for allowing evil to exist that, in his mind, outweigh the desirability of the nonexistence of evil. So Philo also offers an answer that we can allow that God's infinite perfection and the evil of his creation can be reconciled in some unknown way. A sound argument is a valid argument whose premises are all true in fact. Therefore, this argument is unsound.
Van Inwagen’s...

Find Another Essay On Commentary of Evil in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part X

The Problem of Evil in Hume's Dialouges on Natural Religion and "Candide"

1398 words - 6 pages each address this issue in Candide and Dialogues on Natural Religion, respectively. Voltaire does so in a more lighthearted approach typical of the philosophes, employing his wit to address weighty issues of philosophy and at the same time entertaining his readers. Candide makes this point with an amusing story and its brutal satire; Hume does so in a more pedagogical style. However, the Dialogues do employ a sort of plot that helps to draw the

David Hume’s an Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals

688 words - 3 pages concerning it.” Reason is impossible without feeling, they are like two sides of a coin. They constantly affect each other. Hume’s analysis of human belief starts with a distinction between our mental contents. Impressions and emotions appear to be the direct and vivid products of immediate experience. Sympathy is an original impression that later create its product in the form of ideas. Being a part and lying at the foundation of human nature

Commentary of "Learning to Read" in Malcolm X´s Autobiography

672 words - 3 pages In "Learning to Read," an excerpt found in The Autobiography of Malcolm X, author Malcolm X attacks his illiteracy while imprisoned for battling the white man. Malcolm in his conversations with other prisoners realized he was not as articulate with the hustlers in prison as he was in the street. Bimbi, a fellow prisoner in Charlestown Prison would take over conversations because of his vast vocabulary and knowledge from reading. This knowledge

Cause and Effect in David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

954 words - 4 pages Cause and Effect in David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding In An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume states, “there is not, in any single, particular instance of cause and effect, any thing which can suggest the idea of power or necessary connexion” (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume establishes in section II that all ideas originate from impressions that employ the senses (11). Therefore, in order for there

Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning

923 words - 4 pages Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order

The 'Natural' Feminine in Romanticism: A Commentary

1620 words - 6 pages 'feminine' ideals can appear progressive but, as a result, ultimately serves to authenticate an idea of 'natural femininity that is, in the opinion of many a feminist, a repressive patriarchal social construct that lacks any real biological referent. Thus it is very fitting, - but not the least bit subtle - that this artificial idea of femininity should be directly applied to Nature herself. If, as Bethany and Sarah point out, the 'feminine

The Problem of Evil in the Judeo-Christian Tradition Depicted in Hicks' Philosophy of Religion

973 words - 4 pages flaws of its own. In the excerpt from Philosophy of Religion, John Hicks outlines the problem of evil as such: (a) If God were truly omnibenevolent, he would then wish to eliminate all evil; (b) If God is were truly omnipotent, he would then be capable of eliminating evil; (c) Evil exists in the world. Therefore: (d) God is not omnibenevolent or He is not omnipotent. Either element of the conclusion is damaging to the traditional

The Problem of Natural Evil, by Luke Gelinas

1264 words - 5 pages Gelinas introduces his examination of the arguments from natural evil and their replies by noticing that an omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly good being existing in concurrence with the existence of evil appears to be a contradiction. He goes on to state that this inconsistency seems to many to be justifiable in favour of theism through free-will. Free-will dictates that I have the choice of doing wrong or right, and since free-will entails

Discuss and evaluate what part Eastern philosophy and religion play in George Lucas's conception of Star Wars?

669 words - 3 pages for the interpreter.Clearly the Force of the Star Wars films is not like the concepts typically found in Eastern or Western religion or philosophy. We then have the opportunity to learn about just what the Force is. We can also attempt to find if it is a more coherent description of ultimate reality than the concepts typically found in Eastern or Western religion or philosophy.Near the end of Star Wars: A New Hope, when Luke destroys the death star

Sophocles' Use of Social Commentary in Antigone

1523 words - 7 pages Art has the power to reach people across space and time. Although artists primarily use creative media to disseminate their ideas and emotions to a contemporary audience, great art has the ability to reach whoever appreciates it no matter their origin. In Antigone, Sophocles does this by creating a fictionalized Thebes in which he reflects upon the politics, religion, and societal norms of his own world. He creates a ruler, Creon, whose

Commentary on Witchcraft, Magic, and Religion in 17th-Century by Richard Weisman

2180 words - 9 pages mind and gain control of them for wrongdoings. An individual can be blinded by evil and can be taken away from God to glorify the Devil. In the book Witchcraft, Magic, and Religion in 17th-Century Massachusetts by Richard Weisman, the writer focuses on the origins of witchcraft in the village Salem in the 17th century. Weisman’s goal is to portray the people accused during the Salem trials as ordinary human beings and not witches; therefore

Similar Essays

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Essay

1342 words - 5 pages an existence, therefore when explaining the essence and nature of God, there are no such beings or deities in the entire world who possess all three qualities. If this was possible, then that would have to be from a high level of intelligence that no human would be able to comprehend in any fashion of known existence, thus refuting there being and existence of a supreme being all together. Works Cited dialogues concerning natural religion

An Analysis Of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

4432 words - 18 pages bulk of Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion is given over to two discussions of "the" so-called argument from design. (1) In Part 2 Cleanthes succinctly states an "argument a posteriori" that attempts to "prove at once the existence of a Deity, and his similarity to human mind and intelligence." According to this argument, the world and its parts are (like) intricate machines or human contrivances, implying "by all the rules of analogy

David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

1737 words - 7 pages David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion provide conflicting arguments about the nature of the universe, what humans can know about it, and how their knowledge can affect their religious beliefs. The most compelling situation relates to philosophical skepticism and religion; the empiricist character, Cleanthes, strongly defends his position that skepticism is beneficial to religious belief. Under fire from an agnostic skeptic and a

Dialogues Conceringing Natural Religion Essay

903 words - 4 pages Philo first begins his argument by stating that if God is truly dominant than he can control everything. Afterwards he continues on to state that if God was willing to avert evil but not able to than he was inept. If he is able to avert it but not willing to, he is malicious. With that being said, Philo concluded that if God truly believed in the well being of man-kind, than there would be no evil in this world. Demea responds by stating that