Common Law Essay

1591 words - 6 pages

Business Law26th Intake/Semester 5/FLecturer: Mr Raymond FongDate of Submission: 24th April 2010Table of Contents
Introduction

1

Damages

2

Three Major Aspects

4

Case Application

6

4.1 Applicable Law

6

4.2 Applications of facts to law

6

4.3 Conclusion

7

References

8

IntroductionCommon law system is originated in England in middle ages and laws are made by the judges based on the decisions made on the cases. Thus, common law is also known as case law. Decisions on past cases by superior courts are binding and authoritative for future cases handled by lower courts. Under common law, there is contract law which facilitates the transactions made between different parties especially businesses. When there is breach of contracts, remedies are required to solve the problems that are likely to happen. One of the major remedies is common law damages. The very first type of damages could have been Weregeld paid by killer of Saxons for homicides. However, as time passes, more types of damages are formed. In business world, damages are handled based on case laws and originated from different cases just as how common laws are formed. New rules and limitations are created from various cases with different scenarios and facts. For instance, Hadley v Baxendale (1854) set out the rules on the remoteness that determine which losses are claimable for the damages from the breach of contracts. Another example would be Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Ltd v New garage and Motor Co. (1915) case that established guidelines to differentiate between liquidated damages and penalties.DamagesDamages is the main remedy when either one party breach the contract causing the other party to deal with the losses. Common law damages is to compensate the innocent party with the amount of money that would put him/her in the same position as he/she would have been if the contracts have been carried out properly as planned. The damages are granted if the broken contracts can be proved and liability is strict in contract law. However, the purpose of the law is not to punish the offender. Losses need to be analyzed properly before damages claims can be allowed. Damages can be either liquidated damages or unliquidated damages.Liquidated damages are certain sum of money pre-agreed by both parties for the losses they will suffer in the case of breach of contracts. In this case, the damages can be quickly and easily claimed without the requirement of court involvement.Unliquidated damages are compensatory damages when there is no prior agreement of damages if there is breach of contracts and the amount is uncertain. Unless the plaintiff can prove the loss, he will be entitled to the nominal damages only which mostly is just a dollar. The damages he claims will be just to compensate his loss and not the defendant's profits which he made by breaching the contract. For example, in the Surrey County Council v Bredero Homes (1993) case, a local authority sold the land to the...

Find Another Essay On Common Law

Sources of Common Law Essay

4071 words - 16 pages The question requires discussion of the sources of law in the United Kingdom (hereinafter referred to as UK) which comprises of common law, equity, legislation, European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights. The UK is a stranger to codification of laws, hence it comes as no surprise that the UK does not have a written constitution. The English legal system comprises of two main sources of law. Primary sources of law cover common

Comparison of common law and equity law

2888 words - 12 pages Originally, common law was customary law, folk law, based on precedent. There was of course statutory law -- the king's law -- but common law guided how it was enforced and administered. No real common law exists today, having been entirely codified as statutory law throughout the English-speaking world. There remains, however, what are sometimes termed common law rights.Now and again, a new situation arises where there is no law to guide a

The Common Law of Employment

607 words - 3 pages The Canadian employment law system consists of three regimes: common law, employment regulation, and collective bargaining agreement (CBA). From these regimes, the common law of employment is one that was created by Judges over centuries in order to regulate the employer-employee relationship. Judges, from lower level to upper level courts have used employment contracts and torts, two tools available to them under the common law system to aid in

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law

2135 words - 9 pages Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific LawAmericans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law.To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law

History and Application of Common Law

1873 words - 7 pages 1a) Common Law, also widely known as Case Law, derived from the old English common law, is largely based on precedents, where judicial decisions were already previously made in similar cases where it is used as reference bases or sources of law. Also, common law is not codified, which generally means there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and not written in statues [The common law and civil law traditions, 2010:1]. It is during

The Development of Common Law and Equity

3149 words - 13 pages The Development of Common Law and Equity 1.0 Introduction I have been asked to write a report on the development of common law and equity. Common law refers to the law created by judges that was historically significant but has been since superseded by parliament. It is in parallel with equity which refers to the source of law created by the Lord Chancellor which was designed to supplement the common law

Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law

1371 words - 5 pages Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law The law of conspiracy is considerably more complex and uncertain than it need be because the statutory reform of the area largely contained in Part I of the criminal law Act 1977 was only partial. As a result, there are now two types of conspiracy – statutory conspiracies governed by the 1977 Act, and an important but limited range of common law conspiracies, which were expressly retained by the act

Occupiers' Liability from the Common Law

2405 words - 10 pages between invitee and licensee and the Act would “in place of the common law, to regulate the duty the duty the duty which an occupier of a premises owes to visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises…” . Therefore its evident that the common law position in England with regards to occupiers’ liability was to a large extent confined to history with this act. However the Act did not apply to trespassers which were governed by

The History of English Common Law in Hong Kong

833 words - 3 pages local courts. Through the central authority, a unified system of Law was slowly used and it is known as the Common Law. We called it Common Law because the Common Law was common to all men within the King judicial system. As the local custom preceded both judicial precedent and legislation, we can say it is the original source of Law.The Writ SystemWithin the three hundred years after Norman Conquest, local custom was slowly replaced by the Common

The relationship between human rights and common law

2505 words - 10 pages common law and the making of administrative decisions .There has been an ever-increasing gap, between the reality of what the state should be doing in compliance with its obligations, and the actions it has actually taken. "Despite a commitment to internationalism in Australia's human rights diplomacy, international statements of human rights have been enacted as part of domestic law in only a very small number of cases" , given this lack of active

Common Law in Australia: The Tort Of Negligence

9095 words - 36 pages TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.NEGLIGENCE - Negligence is one of many

Similar Essays

Common Law Civil Law Essay

665 words - 3 pages CIVIL-LAW AND COMMON LAW TRADITION: ACOMPARATIVE APROACHCivil law primarily contrasted against common law. The significantdifference is that, historically, common law was developed bycustom whereas civil law was developed by legal principles and theinterpretation of doctrinal writings rather than application of facts tolegal fictions. 'Common-law is extremely decentralized in terms ofthe source of law (making place for evolving cultural changes

Common Law And Marriage Essay

1279 words - 5 pages Common Law relationships are steadily increasing due to several precipitating events.Studies, ranging from the 1930's to 1990's, have proven that couples all over the world are choosing to live common law rather than committing themselves through the legal act of marriage. In the last hundred decades marriage was traditionally based upon the women staying home, raising children, while the man went out and earned a living to support the family

Common Law And Equity Essay

1677 words - 7 pages Equity is frequently referred to as a supplement to the common law. Cruzon defines Equity as a system of law developed by the court of chancery in parallel with the common law. It was designed to complement it, providing remedies for situations that were unavailable at Law. Because of this, Equity provided a dimension of flexibility and justice that was often times lacking because of the common law’s rigidity. This rigidity stems from the fact

Common Law In Australia Essay

1090 words - 4 pages Common law is the law made by judges when deciding a certain case before the court. The reasoning the judge applies becomes a precedent, to be followed by other lower courts in future matters of similarity. This is the basis for the doctrine of precedent. A precedent is either a binding precedent, the reason for a decision of a higher court that must be followed by a court of lower status in the same hierarchy; or a persuasive precedent, meaning