This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Common Law In Australia: The Tort Of Negligence

9095 words - 36 pages

TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.NEGLIGENCE - Negligence is one of many types of Torts. Negligence is now the dominant Tort and the focus of this topic.DEFINITION: Conduct that falls below the standard of care demanded for the protection of others against the unreasonable risk of harm.To establish a claim for Negligence the plaintiff must prove three essential elements:(1) the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care and not to cause him or her e injury, loss or damage in the circumstances of the case.(2) the defendant breached the standard of care; -(3) the plaintiff suffered damage, injury or loss because of that breach. -(4) That the damage suffered by the plaintiff was not too remote - that is, the injury, loss or damage suffered would have been foreseen as a possible result of the breach of the duty by a reasonable person placed in the position of the defendant at the time when he or she breached the duty.ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE1. DUTY OF CARE - Legal obligation on a person engaged in any activity to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that they can foresee would likely cause damage or injury to another personTo be liable in Negligence a 'duty of care' must be owed by one party to another. This rule was established in the House of Lords decision Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). In this case Lord Atkin formulated the "neighbour test" to determine whether a duty of care was owed by one party to another. This test established that you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.Per Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson:" Who is my neighbour? Anyone so directly affected by my actions that I ought reasonably have them in my contemplation as being affected when I am directing my mind to the acts/omissions in question" (an objective test).However, the 'neighbour principle has been condemned as inadequate sole determinant of the duty of care issue to be applied in all negligence cases.1ai) Whether the consequences of the defendant's act were reasonable foreseeable. For example damage or harm to the plaintiff's were held to be reasonably foreseeable in:Thus, the connection between the parties is vital. The Courts have accepted that 'reasonable foreseeability' was not enough and that the proximity of the parties needed also to be established to determine the duty of care. In this regard, consider: Jaensch v Coffey - where the plaintiff suffered nervous shock after seeing the husband who had been involved in a motor accident, it was held that the harm to the plaintiff was reasonably...

Find Another Essay On Common Law in Australia: The Tort Of Negligence

The Ingredients Required to Establish the Tort of Negligence

2281 words - 9 pages The tort of Negligence is defined by Winfield as, ‘as breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage to the claimant’ . To bring an action in the tort of negligence it’s not enough to prove that defendant behaved carelessly. It is just one of the ingredients required to establish the tort of negligence, the claimant must prove that the defendant owes the claimant a duty of care. The defendant has acted in breach of that duty and as

The Purpose of Tort Law in the Irish Legal System

3219 words - 13 pages conduct. The debate of what the purpose of tort law is has continued over many centuries. However, it is possible that this question does not merely have one answer. Tort is an ancient institution and I intend to show in this essay that it is capable of serving many purposes and has been repurposed many times over the years. Historical development of tort law Originally, tort in the common law had a system of compensating for wrongs, there was no

Medicine and the Law of Negligence

1717 words - 7 pages 1.0 Introduction The tort of negligence is designed to give citizens of society protection from personal injury damages caused by negligent action of someone else. The reform of negligence adopted from the ‘Ipp Report’ in 2003, have gone too far in trying to decrease the number of negligence claims against professionals. Due to these reforms of 2003, citizens who have legitimate claim to compensation, are now left with less chance to hold a

The Common Law of Employment

607 words - 3 pages The Canadian employment law system consists of three regimes: common law, employment regulation, and collective bargaining agreement (CBA). From these regimes, the common law of employment is one that was created by Judges over centuries in order to regulate the employer-employee relationship. Judges, from lower level to upper level courts have used employment contracts and torts, two tools available to them under the common law system to aid in

The History of English Common Law in Hong Kong

833 words - 3 pages , the writs became formalized so all the arguments in civil matters became more determinable by the Common Law then by the local custom. Moreover, the Norman King started the feudalism; it means all the land was owned by the King. No people except the King had rights to own a piece of land. As a result , all disputes concerning the title to land were removed from the local system.Equity LawAt the beginning of the writ system developed, the Common

Discuss the extent to which public servants owe a duty of care under the tort of negligence

2565 words - 10 pages IntroductionThe tort of negligence was established by the House of Lords in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]. In this case the claimant’s friend ordered a bottle of ginger beer for the claimant. The ginger beer was contained in an opaque bottle. Having drunk some of the ginger beer, the claimant poured the remainder into her glass. As she did so, the remains of a decomposed snail fell out. The claimant became ill and sued the manufacturer of the

The Division Of Law-making Powers In Australia

1266 words - 5 pages supreme law making power was to create the Senate in the Federal Parliament. The Senate is a States house with an equal number of representatives from each State, regardless of population, and it can easily veto (reject) any Bill proposed by the Commonwealth Parliament. This was important because even though it was the Commonwealth Parliament, the states could still have a major voice.In 1942 World War Two was a major issue in Australia. The

Essay on tort law history, in particular looking at the British and Australian tort law development through the 19th century

1396 words - 6 pages . It was because of this change in society that negligence law rapidly developed.Despite being criticized for omitting elements of negligent law such as railroad accidents White does give a more just account of the law as he does not disregard an internal coherence, which Friedman's arguments tends to discount. Rather White concentrates on the individuals within the legal system and their effect on the shaping of Tort law. This angle challenges

Australian Law Assignment Discuss the elements of the law of negligence highlighting recent developments

2403 words - 10 pages Australian Law AssignmentQuestion: The test in Australia has been applied as a two part test, one of foreseeability and proximity. Discuss the elements of the law of negligence highlighting recent developments.Table of Cases CitedCases CitedCaparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605Chapman v Hearse (1962) 106 CLR 112Donoghue v Stevenson [1932} AC 562Hill v Van Erp (1997) 71 ALJR 487Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 115 CLR 549Nagle v Rottnest Island

The Development of Common Law and Equity

3149 words - 13 pages The Development of Common Law and Equity 1.0 Introduction I have been asked to write a report on the development of common law and equity. Common law refers to the law created by judges that was historically significant but has been since superseded by parliament. It is in parallel with equity which refers to the source of law created by the Lord Chancellor which was designed to supplement the common law

Tort law in Canada and what this area of law is all about

1111 words - 4 pages be a detriment to society.Tort law is used in society as an advantage by helping the victim receive damages from the person who caused the injury or damage. Tort law is great when it is used properly. If you get injured due to the negligence of another person it is not right. Tort law is a benefit because the victim will receive compensation for the mistakes of the person who was negligent. As an example of a real case; John Doe is suing Thomas

Similar Essays

Common Law In Australia Essay

1090 words - 4 pages Common law is the law made by judges when deciding a certain case before the court. The reasoning the judge applies becomes a precedent, to be followed by other lower courts in future matters of similarity. This is the basis for the doctrine of precedent. A precedent is either a binding precedent, the reason for a decision of a higher court that must be followed by a court of lower status in the same hierarchy; or a persuasive precedent, meaning

Tort Law Negligence Misstatement Llb Assignment

1153 words - 5 pages Q5, 2017, ZONE B 1. Liam -> formal investigation by Diego, an independent HR Consultant which subsequently lead to Liam being dismissed by the head teacher. -> The negligence misstatement here is made to a third party, which then causes financial loss to Liam (i.e Liam was dismissed at 55, when he has 10 more working years to go.) -> Based on errors and inaccuracies, in the investigations report, have come to luge. · Kim was out of the country

Key Similarities And Differences Between Roman Delict And Common Law Tort

2690 words - 11 pages similarity between the tort of trespass to the person, in the form of assault and the delict of insult or injuria. However there is only one major difference between the roman law of delicts and the common law of torts, the roman law of delicts has a penal element to its punishment , whereas the common law of torts is strictly a civil and compensatory damages punishment. Similarities The Roman delict can be defined as a wrongful act which causes

The Test Of Remoteness In The Tort Of Negligence

826 words - 4 pages The law places a limit upon the extent to which the defendant is liable for the loss which occurs from his breach of a duty of care to the plaintiff, once it is established that the loss sustained by the plaintiff is one recoverable in negligence. The test of remoteness of damage limits this liability by defining certain types of damage or losses as being irrecoverable as a matter of law. The test is carried out to protect the defendant in