Community By Jury Essay

1896 words - 8 pages

We live in a world where differences stand out and are often celebrated. This can lead to success on an individual level, but within an organization, finding common ground can lead to structural cohesion. Cooperation within an organization has been noted as a key component as numerous scholars have mentioned that a sense of community is important to organizational success. It is important to set a parameter of what community is. Kouzes and Posner (2003) observed that “creating a community requires promoting shared values and developing an appreciation for the value of working together an caring about one another” (p. 92). These shared values allow an organization to operate ...view middle of the document...

The movie 12 Angry Men provides a unique case study into how community is built within an organization. The lead character, Juror #8, played by Henry Fonda allowed viewers to see a leader can create a cooperative community in a group with diverse and contradictory worldviews. This paper builds on the premise that community is an important part of organizational success and that ethical standards play a practical role within that community. Spitzer (2000) showed how a leader who provided principle-based ethics can foster a communal environment for an organization. By studying how Juror #8 was able to build a common ground among this differing group of men, we will better understand how communication, inclusion, and cooperation promotes organizational health. Kouzes and Posner (2003) noted that cooperative relationships are more productive than competitive relationships. This may appear to be an obvious point, but it is especially important within a group. This paper will also explore how community has played a large part in my personal growth as a leader and how I would create a cooperative, productive, and moral community.
Community by Jury
Jury dynamics provides an emotional and intellectual exercise for jurors to collaborate with their peers to come up with an agreed upon decision. Differing worldviews are brought to light during juror deliberations. In the movie, 12 Angry Men, the audience is provided with examples of how a group of strangers with divergent views were able to come together to a make a unanimous decision in a murder trial. The jury was instructed by the judge, led by the foreman, but inspired by Juror 8. Fonda’s character was able to bring about a sense of common ground through a calm manner. Kouzes and Posner (2003) noted that people will not see a compelling reason to commit to the community unless they know they have something in common. In the movie, the group had more than just their shared experience of being on this fateful jury. Juror 8 is able to show each member that they should look at the case through a different lens. He encouraged them to look beyond the literal evidence and put themselves into the situation of the alleged murder. This was another step towards finding common ground. In this instance, it was a commonality with the defendant. Each juror brought in their own personal opinions of the legal system and society as a whole, but by making the evidence appear in practical terms this provided a common path for the jury to travel. Kouzes and Posner (2007) observed that credible leaders empower constituents to take actions that support higher organizational purposes. Juror 8 made a concerted effort to show how was interested in inclusive and cooperative goals and that effort paid off.
By standing alone, Juror 8 was able to create an opportunity for the group. Johnson (2007) denoted dissenting views bring about group decision-making effectiveness by encouraging group members to think analytically and...

Find Another Essay On Community by Jury

nullification Essay

1163 words - 5 pages ability to provide a referendum on the law if they view law is unjust or being applied unjustly in a process known as jury nullification. Horowitz and Willging describe jury nullification as a situation in jurors do not convict the defendant because the “strict interpretation of the law would result in an injustice or a violation of the moral conscience of the community.” (Horowtiz, Willging 166) Individuals who do not support the ability of the jury

The Jury and Its Role in the Courts of Trial

2023 words - 8 pages The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely

The American Jury: Justice is Challenged

680 words - 3 pages The American Jury: Justice is ChallengedWhen used in criminal cases, Jury trials tend to occur where the crime is extremely serious, and "no fault tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States". Meanwhile, as it is the jury who gives the verdict, how a jury is selected and what it is supposed to do play a very important role in defending the law. However, justice of law is challenged in several aspects in

The History of the Jury System

678 words - 3 pages ensuring equity and empowering citizens to determine and play a role in justice. According to Abramson (1994), the only way an ordinary citizen participates in government and injects community values in the administration of justice is through the jury system. This has been the only system that has placed power directly in the hands of the citizens (Abramson, 1994). As a result, the jury does help society’s acceptance of judicial decisions. The

Law In Action

1206 words - 5 pages The jury system was introduced in Queensland in 1867 as part of the Queensland Constitution Act. Juries are used in indictable offences in criminal trials. They are mainly used in the District and Supreme Court if the accused pleads guilty. Juries are used to decide the guilt or innocence, of the accused person, based on the facts and evidence provided in court by the Prosecution and Defence Council. The legislation that governs the jury

Jury Nullification

2169 words - 9 pages benefits to 'their' own community, then by the customary criminal justice process, which is made up by "white lawmakers and white law enforcers." He goes on to say that "jury nullification gives the African-American community the power to decide justice for them, one case at a time regardless of whether white people understand or not." (Neubauer, 2001 pp. 109)In 1771, a Mr. John Adams who was our second President of the United States stated; "It is

A Dilemma of the Jury Selection Process?

1875 words - 8 pages duty. In fact, only people who are in active military service, members of fire or police departments and certain appointed public officials are completely exempt from serving on a jury. Even though avoiding jury duty might be punished by community service for up to 60 hours, people are still likely to try to be excused (Internet 2). Ultimately, this upper income group is also excluded from jury summons process and this undermines the representation

Innocent Judged By Ignorants

1853 words - 7 pages Tom Barrett, American politician and actual 40th Mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Jury trials take twice as long and lead to far more appeals than cases tried by a judge alone, they note. Along with community values jurors often bring community prejudices against racial minorities or in favor or vigilantes. The point he is trying to make here is that when jury of peers comes together, it must be associated with different factors that affect

Jury Nullification

1456 words - 6 pages facts. In order to fulfill their duty to the defendant, the community and their own consciences, they must use their own judgment to determine right and wrong and nullify unjust laws.Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect mollifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fates that

Discuss whether trial by jury should be abolished in the English legal system? Critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the system

2010 words - 8 pages of the jury is to provide trial by peer group, a notion encapsulated in the Magna Carta of 1215. Clause 39 of the charter stated that "no man shall be imprisoned...except by the lawful judgement of his peer..."Allowing some people to avoid jury service by virtue of their occupation means that the diversity of the community from which jury members are drawn is not properly reflected. A long trial could mean that invaluable training would be missed

California Assembly Bill 1401

954 words - 4 pages should enjoy this right of citizenship. He added, “It is about making sure that we uphold the standards of our justice system and make sure everybody is afforded a jury of their peers" (“para 6, 2013). AB 1401 would have dropped the lawfully present immigrants from the list of people that are excluded from jury lists that are collected in part from California’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) records. The bill was introduced by Assemblyman

Similar Essays

Jury Trial Analysis

1143 words - 5 pages A jury trial is not to be confused with a bench trial as it often times is. While a bench trial takes places only in front of a Judge who is then tasked with coming to a verdict on his/her own, a jury trial is one that is “composed of members of the community present at the trial to act as the finder of fact” (McGuigan, 2014). The constitutional trial rights that are sanctioned throughout a jury trial is called a trial by jury. This is in the

Jury System Essay: Whether Or Not Jury Systems Should Be Used In Australia Legal Studies Essay

1019 words - 5 pages just by a Judge2. A jury’s role is to listen carefully to evidence in court, and deliberate a verdict of guilty, or not guilty. As mentioned previously, having a jury system makes the community participate directly into the administration of justice, and connects citizens to the constitution3. It also spreads the weight of responsibility, and individual bias can be ruled out when sharing the decision making, rather than having one judge6. The jury

Juries In Nsw Essay

971 words - 4 pages disadvantages of the jury system in NSW in 2005 Advantages - Provides a link between the public and the legal system which reflects the community’s values. - The decision is made by more than 1 person giving an opportunity for the accused to be not guilty - Jurors are not controlled by the government - Gives an opportunity to people from the community to participate in the justice system - The use of

The Jury System And Democracy Essay

1115 words - 5 pages in a legal case by analysing all submitted evidence in court room known as a jury member. The trial is a method of reducing complexity of any case to protect a fair and a neutral administration of justice between two parties to the action. Trial board Consider all the matters in issue between two parties and also provides a final legal decision for the disputing matter. Under the adversary system, resolving a dispute by the jury trial method is