This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Comparative Essay Describing The Ethics Of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, And Emmanuel Levinas.

893 words - 4 pages

Philosophers live and encourage others to live according to the rules of practical wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human life, Kant observed duty and obligation from respect for the law, and Levinas examined one's responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view offer different answers regarding the search for the good. In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound together by similar ideas. For example, each of the philosophers believed in optimism-- they thought that all humans are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers believed in using reason to be ethical. They emphasized the concept of living well and acting well by using virtuous habits and good character to reach the "good". Furthermore, they all believed in self actualization-- in other words, ethically being the best one can be. They all thought an ethical person must be rational and responsible for their actions. They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society.Aristotle lived during the B.C. era and established the concept of teleological ethics. This means that ethics has a purpose or a reason. He stressed the concept of doctrine of the mean-- maintaining balance in one's actions. Additionally, he theorized the idea of developing virtuous habits to build good character as well as that happiness is the main goal of all human beings. He explained how reaching one's potential by living well and acting well will ultimately lead to happiness. Moreover, he stated one should base one's actions on reason and he introduced the concept that reason controls desire.Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who lived the majority his life in the 1700's. He believed that an individual should use God, freedom, and immortality to be able to pursue and attain the supreme good. He also believed in deontological ethics, meaning it is one's obligation and duty to do what is right. Kant said that an individual must use intellect, free will, and reason to carry out this duty. He is similar to Aristotle because likewise, he believed that it is ideal for all people to act in an ethical manner by using reason. However, unlike Aristotle, Kant believed one must act ethically as an individual autonomy for the good of society. He said that one must use reason and free will to carry out one's duty and moral obligation to do good. He stressed the concept of not expecting to gain anything in return while...

Find Another Essay On Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas.

Immanuel Kant and the Moral Law

971 words - 4 pages Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century, widely known for his various achievements and works such as Critique of Pure Reason and Foundations of Metaphysics of Morals. Kant developed a theory of ethics that depends on reason rather than emotion called The Moral Law. Kant was not anti-religious but he wanted an ethical system that was not obscured by religion, emotion or personal interpretation. According to Kant, morality is

The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

2526 words - 10 pages : Balterson, D. The Philosophy of Immanuel Kant Toronto, 1984 Jewson, M. Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason Rome, 1986 Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason N.K. Smith tr London, 1929 McConnor, T. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment London, 1989 Tonderson, P. Immanuel Kant: The Critique of Of Pure Reason New York, 1987 Wallis, H. The Thought of Immanuel Kant New York, 1955 O Neill, P., SJ, Kant and Aquinas: A Comparative Study, Rome, 1967

Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

1849 words - 8 pages believe that one can have a foot on both sides, like Immanuel Kant. To be on one side or the other never gives you full knowledge you must be willing to use your senses and your reason to form ideas. Kant was to first to step away from choosing a side. Kant changed philosophy in the way that he showed that certain aspects of rationalism and empiricism were wrong. Kant was also the first to say that objects conform to our knowledge meaning that

Autonomous Thinking and Immanuel Kant

830 words - 4 pages Considered to be one of the most important philosophers of modern Europe and an important part of philosophical thinking, Immanuel Kant paved the way for current ethical thinkers. He paved the way for philosophers and social behavioral scientists such as Jean Piaget. Kant's theory is hinged by his beliefs on autonomy and his formulation of categorical imperatives. Kant believed in autonomy however, knowing that autonomy has flaws, he created the

Human cloning and Immanuel Kant

1135 words - 5 pages by definition, "good." Kant argued thatindividuals instinctively avoid behavior, which, ifperformed by everyone, would create anarchy. "We know, notby reasoning, but by vivid and immediate feelings, thatwe must avoid behavior which, if adopted by all men, wouldrender social life impossible" (Durant, 1961, p. 209).As this brief summary of Kantian ethics suggests, ifKant were presented with the problem of the morality ofgenetic research, he would

Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

950 words - 4 pages Florida International University Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics Haley Beahn (2697300) PHI 2600 Professor Henry Maklakiewicz 16 April 2014 Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then

Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

2543 words - 11 pages Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then describes steps required for humans to obtain the ultimate happiness. He also states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. A virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself

Examining the Ethics of Plato and Aristotle

1051 words - 4 pages This essay will be examining the ethics of Plato (428-347 BCE) and Aristotle (384-322 B.C). I will firstly attempt to summarise the five fundamental concepts of Plato and Aristotle before providing my own opinion and view on their ethics. I will concentrate on their theories on the good life as a life of justice, censorship, knowledge and the good life. I will first examine Plato’s ethics. Plato was a philosopher who was both a rationalist

Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

1506 words - 6 pages Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle describes the steps required for humans to obtain happiness. Aristotle states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. He states that a happy person cannot be inactive. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The virtuous

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE PHILOSOPHIES OF PLATO AND ARISTOTLE

1803 words - 7 pages Plato and Aristotle are undoubtedly the greatest of philosophers that the world has seen. Both Plato and Aristotle formed unique and distinct theories about the Greek city states. While most people believe that Plato and Aristotle are complete opposites of one another, it is not completely true. For those who have studied the works of both the philosophers, the theory proposed by Aristotle is just a development of the Platonic system because

Comparing David Hume and Immanuel Kant

1386 words - 6 pages Comparing David Hume and Immanuel Kant David Hume and Immanuel Kant each made a significant break from other theorists in putting forward a morality that doesn’t require a higher being or god, for a man to recognize his moral duty. Although Hume and Kant shared some basic principals they differed on their view of morality. In comparing the different views on human will and the maxims established to determine moral worth by David Hume and

Similar Essays

Aristotle Versus Kant On Ethics As The Science For The Achieve To Happiness

1569 words - 7 pages . Aristotle The Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Oxford UP, 1998.Johnson, Robert. "Kant's Moral Philosophy." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. CD-ROM. 2004.Immanuel Kant and the Categorical Imperative. (Online) Availablehttp://http://www.faithnet.org.uk/A2%20Subjects/Ethics/catergoricalimperative.htm Fall2005.

The Face, By Emmanuel Levinas Essay

1045 words - 4 pages This short essay engages in a close reading of a passage of Emmanuel Levinas’s ‘The Face’ drawing on the concepts of identity and relational logics. Questions concerning the assumptions employed by Levinas about time, space and form of being will be asked of the text in order to create a dialogue with its meaning. The potential implications of these assumptions will also be explored through the consideration of hinge words and pivotal phrases

19th And 20th Philosophy: The Views Of Emmanuel Kant

2711 words - 11 pages unity, can be regarded in two ways; 1) General logic is applied to concepts. 2) Logical forms are given conceptual content. These are two ways of describing the same thing, and differ only in point of view. By applying General logic to concepts, it seems to be the natural conclusion from the way that Kant states the problem but the formulation. By giving logical forms conceptual content, it is more useful in understanding what is happening

Analyzing The Political Thoughts Of Immanuel Kant And G.W.F. Hegel

1922 words - 8 pages Director Steve McQueen, in his 2013 film “12 Years a Slave” provides four examples of the philosophical arguments of both Immanuel Kant and G.W.F Hegel. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit argues two forms of consciousness. His categorization on the codependent relationship between lord and bondsman is complementary to Kant’s political thought on the categorical imperative. Kant argues in The Grounding of Metaphysics of Morals, that in the