Comparative Study Of Machiavelli's 'the Prince' And 'julius Caesar' Wenona Essay

1108 words - 5 pages

Module A - Intertextual Perspectives
To secure public support and thus a strong hold on power, one must demonstrate ruthless and decisive authoritative practices in leadership. Both written in response to respective fractious political climates and shifting philosophical perspectives; Niccolò Machiavelli’s advisory handbook The Prince (1513) and William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar (1599), reveal through a comparative study how composer’s differing contexts produce similar perspectives on the importance of decisive leadership, however conversely represent the consequences of the Machiavellian leadership model, particularly regarding the success of fear as means of securing public support. Machiavelli, writing to the Medici family in a time of civil and political strife in Renaissance Italy, emphasises the necessity of cruelty in uniting a fundamentally corrupted society, encouraging violent discourse as a means gaining respect through fear. Contrastingly spurred by political uncertainty surrounding the fate of the Elizabethan monarchy and ensuing societal instability, Shakespeare scrutinises the Machiavellian treatment of fear, inferring its contribution to leaders vulnerability and subsequent social instability. Both texts share similar ideas regarding the necessity of decisive leadership in securing public support, however Shakespeare demonstrates the consequences of Machiavellian leadership through contrasting characters that posses tactical prowess, against those who fail to uphold such qualities.
Responding to Italy’s civil conflict and successive military coups, Machiavelli’s advisory handbook The Prince provides a formulaic simplification of governance to the Medici family, advocating the necessity of fearsome and cruel authoritarian regimes in controlling the fickle public. Machiavelli characterises mankind as undignified and easily manipulated through the cynical aphorism ‘Men are a sad lot’, challenging humanist paradigms, and subverting the traditional Christian conventions. Machiavelli’s pessimistic commentary of human nature endorses the necessity of fear as a means of securing loyalty, as men are less likely to transgress against a leader who is capable to exercising violence. Through advocating fear as a means of securing loyalty, Machiavelli uses the binary imagery ‘It’s much safer to be feared than loved’ presenting fear as a constant characteristic of human nature, easily played upon by leaders to secure absolute authority. Machiavelli cements his argument through his classical allusion to Hannibal Barca, who applied cruelty to his troops, so they always looked up at him with ‘respect and terror.’ While Machiavelli subverts humanist and Christian conventions to reinforce the necessity of cruelty amongst leaders to subdue dissent; Shakespeare suggests that fear driven leadership breeds instability within society, demonstrating the precipitation of contrasting ideas of leadership in each text.
Similar to the tangible sense of...

Find Another Essay On Comparative study of Machiavelli's 'The Prince' and 'Julius Caesar' - Wenona - Essay

Macbeth and Machiavelli's The Prince Essay

888 words - 4 pages In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he stats that it is better to be feared than loved, but that one should avoid being despised and hated. With these concepts at hand we can compare these philosophies to one of Shakespeare’s most famous plays Macbeth. This play can be analyzed through two important characters Macbeth and Duncan. They both have their own tragic flaws and how they came to power. But Macbeth had gained his title illegitimately

This essay is a summary of Machiavelli's "The Prince"

1306 words - 5 pages , 1513, p. 48). His basic message is that leaders must surround themselves with loyal followers and be cautious of those who are in opposition. According to Bass (1990), Machiavelli's advice is that "strong, ruthless, and cynical leadership is required of the prince because people are completely and inherently self-interested and self-serving"(p. 134). In public schools, principals surround themselves with teachers and other administrators with whom

Julius Caesar Essay: The Character of Brutus

1243 words - 5 pages The Character of Brutus in Julius Caesar      “Et tu Brute?” Caesar’s simple statement sums up Brutus’ round character in the development of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus was thought to represent no threat due to his nobility and his loyalty; however, these qualities are precisely why the story is such a catastrophe.  What stemmed from these traits is the last expected outcome.  Caesar’s surprise was so immense, he could only mutter

Virtu and Fortune in Machiavelli's The Prince

2406 words - 10 pages Explain the relationship between 'virtú' and Fortune in Machiavelli's thought.The following essay is written to highlight the relationship between Machiavelli's delineations of the concepts of virtú and fortune in his 1532 political treatise, 'The Prince'. In order to examine the relationship between these two notions, their relation to the rest of the text and their relation to the context in which Machiavelli defined them, it is

Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince

1154 words - 5 pages Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince When the word "Renaissance" is mentioned, an image of love for antiquity learning and fine arts usually springs to one's mind. Yet this perception, however legitimate it may be in many areas of Renaissance human achievements, shatters in the face of Niccolò Machiavelli's masterpiece The Prince. Unlike his contemporary Baldassare Castiglione who exemplified subtlety, Machiavelli was

The Rise and Downfall of Julius Caesar

913 words - 4 pages Know for being an amazing general and the ruler of ancient Rome, Julius Caesar isn’t at all recognized for his accomplishment before the last few years of his life. That’s what made him such a popular dictator, the fact that he was just an average joe that made a name for himself. Julius Caesar is one of the most influential people in history because of his successful political career, the amazing things he accomplished in a short

Comparing Orwell's "1984" and Machiavelli's "The Prince"

1932 words - 8 pages When examining the totalitarian government of 1984 by George Orwell, a direct connection can be drawn to the motives and ideals associated with Niccoló Machiavelli’s The Prince. Machiavelli’s support of the political necessity as a means to remain in power resonate with the government whose aim is to “extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought” as a way to ensure complete political orthodoxy within the country (193

comparing good and bad qualities of Machiavelli's the Prince to leader Mao Zedong - homeschool english 10th grade - essay

626 words - 3 pages Surname 1 Name Professor Course title Date Good and Bad Qualities of Machiavelli's the Princes and Leader Mao Zedong Mao Zedong was a Chinese communist revolutionary, a political leader, a poet and the founding political leader of the people's republic of China. He was the chairperson of the Communist Party of the republic of China from the time it was established in the year 1949 until 1976, the year in which he died. While Machiavelli's the

Machiavelli's "The Prince"

1081 words - 4 pages The PrinceWhat would it take to be a Prince and stay in power? In the story of the Prince,Machiavelli writes about some controversial ways to keep power, if you were a Prince. Afterreading this story I asked my self the question, do I agree with Machiavelli's methods. If I werethe Prince and was presented with Machiavelli's treatise, I would accept and his ideas andadvice. Machiavelli, first makes the point of how a countries army's structure

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

1043 words - 4 pages Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the nature of power and his views of power are still somewhat in existence today. I'll discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Machiavelli discusses power over the people, dictatorial power, and power with people, shared power. While it is possible for power with to attain greater prevalence in society, it will not completely eliminate power

Machiavelli's "The Prince"

986 words - 4 pages The study of Machiavelli's view of human nature is a doleful task. In reviewing The Prince, it does not seem that Machiavelli attributes to man any basically good intrinsic characteristics, such as loyalty, selflessness, or concern for others. In short, he appears to view humans as being downright wicked. When good fortune prevails, they conform and in unfavorable times, they rebel. Machiavelli counsels that a prince must always be wary of men

Similar Essays

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince And Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

1045 words - 4 pages . William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar utilizes similar methods. As shown in Julius Caesar and The Prince, a leader who follows Machiavelli’s advice will accomplish their goals; if the leader does not adhere to Machiavelli’s recommendations, then the leader will not fulfill his aspiration. A character from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Cassius, exhibits Machiavellian attributes by manipulation and a drive to accomplish his goal of assassinating

Julius Caesar And The Odyssey Comparative Essay

884 words - 4 pages Julius Caesar and The Odyssey Comparative Essay Throughout William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar and Homer’s epic poem The Odyssey, loyalty is strongly presented as a major motif. In both texts, loyalty is highly valued as one of the most important traits to a person’s character. Not only do the loyal characters receive better fates, but those who are not loyal are punished for the actions, usually through revenge. In Julius Caesar, the

Comparing Leadership In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar And Machiavelli’s The Prince

1467 words - 6 pages the “right” decisions for the community, taking the blame, and being selfless. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Machiavelli’s The Prince, there are various examples as to what is the difference between a good and a bad leader, including initiative, accountability, generosity, and the leader’s values. A leader must learn to take the initiatives for many of his projects. In Julius Caesar, Cassius tries to convince Brutus of joining the

Julius Caesar Comparative Essay: Mark Antony And Marcus Brutus

1136 words - 5 pages The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, is a tragic drama that takes place in the 1st century BC in Rome, Italy. The play covers events surrounding and including the death of Julius Caesar. Mark Antony is his trusted friend and supporter. Another friend of Caesar, but much less of a supporter, is Marcus Brutus, who is a leader of the conspiracy against Caesar. While Antony and Brutus are both friends of Caesar, other