Compare The Leadership Qualities Shown By Caesar, Antony And Lepidus So Far. How Effective Is Each As A Leader And Why?

1440 words - 6 pages

The story of Antony and Cleopatra is set just as world leaders began evolving. Prior to this change a good leader was seen as being a mighty warrior, someone who was skilful in the battlefield, but as demands of the world began changing, leaders began evolving into politicians. There was no need for them to be great warriors; they had to be cunning, manipulative and intelligent. Antony, Caesar and Lepidus are all different types of leaders and are each effective in their own way.In a play, first impressions of a character are very important as they set a base that can be built on throughout the play. The first time the audience sees Antony he is in Egypt being self-indulgent with Cleopatra. The audience sees him as being carefree, lazy and over dramatic. "There's not a minute of our lives should stretch/Without some pleasure now," shows the audience that Antony likes to relax and enjoy his time. Here, Shakespeare writes in verse, which emphasises the lustrous nature of Egypt and everyone in it, Antony does not seem to be at all concerned with anything else other than himself and Cleopatra. In contrast, when the audience first sees Antony and Lepidus, the difference is huge. The scene is set in Rome and Shakespeare writes in rigid prose, which gives the impression of order and structure. Caesar and Lepidus are talking about what a disgrace Antony has become and are very focussed on their goals, winning the battle. Caesar says "Let's grant it is not/Amiss to tumble on the bed of Ptolemy...yet must/Antony/No way excuse his foils when we do bear/So great weight in his lightness." This shows the audience the difference between Antony and Caesar. Caesar is not angered by the fact that Antony is being indulgent in Egypt, he is angered by the fact that he is neglecting his duties as a leader.When the audience is first introduced to Lepidus he does not make much of an impression. Caesar is obviously the dominant one out of the two and so Lepidus seems to fade into the background. He does not seem very confident and is seen simply agreeing with Caesar or announcing messengers. For example, "Here's more news." Lepidus says very little and when he does speak he seems to be defending Antony's ways, "I must not think these are/Evils enough to darken all his goodness." By doing this he comes across as being weak and unimportant in the shadow of Caesar.From the first few scenes the audience has a sense of the qualities of these three leaders. Antony, whilst he was once a very strong courageous warrior who "didst drink/The stale of horses," to survive has succumb to the opulent ways of Egypt. Therefore he is seen to be weak willed and not very ambitious. Caesar is seen as being very rigid and strong. He is confident and focussed on what he has to do to remain in power. The audience does not really get much of an impression of Lepidus. He is seen as being weak and unable to control the conversation the way Caesar does. He is focussed on his goals but the audience...

Find Another Essay On Compare the leadership qualities shown by Caesar, Antony and Lepidus so far. How effective is each as a leader and why?

Caesar: A Man Of Power. History Essay Proving Why Julius Caesar Was A Great Leader And So Successful In His Political Rise In Rome

926 words - 4 pages Great Leader, 1) While in Cadiz, he burst into tears admiring a statue of Alexander the Great. When his friends asked him why, they were greatly surprised. Caesar said, "Do you think I have not just cause to weep, when I consider that Alexander at my age has conquered so many nations, and I have all this time done nothing that is memorable." (Akinde, 6) Undoubtedly this shows he was a deep thinker.Because he was a brave and courageous man, he

Management of change, and why is it so effective?

1805 words - 7 pages . 2002: 346). So it comes to the question, why is it a necessity for organisations to change? And what affects upon effective change management?Robbins et al discusses that change is driven by five main points; the nature of the workforce, technology, competition, social trends and world politics (Robbins, S.P. et al 2004: 568). The nature of the workforce affects change due to the diversity of organisation itself. As the organisation grows in size

New Aspects of Leadership A significant part of effective leadership is the close connection between the leader and the follower, which often determines the success of the leader's mission

1059 words - 4 pages become more diverse, leaders must learn how to communicate with them as individuals if a vision is to be shared, a cohesive group to be formed, and a goal to be achieved. Each follower is important and can contribute something to the mission. Understanding the diversity among followers or potential followers can make a significant impact when trying to make them work together as a team. Despite differences in opinions, the leader and followers

Aboilitionist Movement and Why It Was So Effective

833 words - 4 pages North there came a group of Virginians with the mind set to stimulate the commencement of antislavery without interfering with property rights. This organized group called themselves the American Colonization Society (ACS), which formulated in 1817 and therefore, beginning the movement. The ACS wanted to resettle the slaves elsewhere and did so by repaying slave owners. An abundance amount of these funds given to the Society were received from

Spain's Pre-War Years, speaks of why the years before the Spanish Civil War of 1936 so confusing and unstable, resulting in the need for a totalitarian leader?

2811 words - 11 pages confusion was for the General to rule by decree, as a dictator.14Ruling through the Army at first, one of his first objectives was to put an end to the Riff War. He collaborated with France, and with their aid, successfully occupied the protectorate by 1927.15 At home, he was aware of the anarchist threat, so he outlawed the CNT and gave exclusive rights of the trade union to the UGT.16 He was aware of the willingness of the UGT to cooperate with the

Compare The Birthing Scene In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Directed By Kenneth Branagh (1994) With The Original Version Directed By James Whale (1931). Which Do You Think Is Most Effective And Why?

1361 words - 5 pages . The James Whale is considered by many people to be a classic because it is still being watched some 70 years later. Although "˜Mary Shelley's Frankenstein' by Kenneth Branagh is still too modern to be considered a classic, I think in years to come it will still be being watched as one of the best "˜Frankenstein' adaptations.I think "˜Frankenstein' is the type of film that improves as technology develops, allowing better special effects, and, to some extent, reality. The Kenneth Branagh version pays more attention to detail and I preferred his portrayal of Victor. I think this makes Kenneth Branagh's "˜Mary Shelley's Frankenstein' more effective.

Why is the Declaration of Independence of the United States so Effective?

694 words - 3 pages declares their independence, it affects the whole world. But why was this declaration so effective? “That whenever any Form of the Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.” When Thomas Jefferson writes this, I presume that he is trying to tell the colonies that if the government will not give them their rights, they must stand up and fight for it. Their rights will affect the safety

Compare the play "Pygmalion" by George Bernard Shaw with its film version "My fair lady". Which do you find more effective work of art and why. Use quotes

1908 words - 8 pages these and Pickering is the one who gives her the rest of her social class in addition to the language given by Higgins. So language also has an important role as shown in Higgins song “why cant the English?” where he says that Eliza is “condemned by every syllable that she utters”.In the year 300 b.c. Aristotle made it clear that a tragedy usually ends in death and a comedy ends in marriage. Throughout the play, Bernard Shaw

Why did "The Big Three" disagree each other so strongly during the treaty of Versailles?

507 words - 3 pages The first dispute occurred in January 1919. A meeting was held at Versailles in France by the leaders of each country as to decide how to punish the Germans. The leaders who attended the meeting were Lloyd George, prime minister of England, Georges Clemenceau, prime minister of France, and Woodrow Wilson, president of America. They were also known as "The Big Three" However they disagreed with each other's ideas. They each wanted something

A Comparison of the Speeches Made by Brutus and Antony Over the Body of Caesar

2034 words - 8 pages A Comparison of the Speeches Made by Brutus and Antony Over the Body of Caesar “Liberty! Freedom! Tyranny is dead!” So claims Cinna as Caesar is fallen. Brutus his trusty friend killed for Rome while Cassius his jealous counterpart killed over hate. The conspirators brought his body to the market place to show the people. Over the corpse, two speeches were made. In this essay I will compare and contrast these two

Essay - Antony and Cleopatra - In Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, it is Octavius Caesar who emerges as the most powerful figure throughout the play. Discuss. (Approx. 1200 - 1500 words)

1038 words - 4 pages my sword, made weak by my affection would obey it on all cause" in act 3 scene 11. Before this comment was made Antony was mad at Cleopatra, after it he says "Fall not a tear, I say, one of them rates, all that is won and lost. Give me a kiss" This emphasizes how Cleopatra's manipulative power is so strong that it can dominate even Antony.Also sexual power is evident amongst Cleopatra throughout the play. Enobabus uses blank verse and dialogue

Similar Essays

Antony A Better Leader Than Caesar In Shakespeare's Antony And Cleopatra:

1078 words - 4 pages the front of his army in order to humiliate Antony so that he has a psychological advantage in the battle. Caesar even uses his sister by supporting a marriage between Antony and Octavia. Judging from Caesar?s clear sightedness, this is a cunning ploy to later, as Antony deserts Octavia, have a reason to proclaim war on Antony. Therefore Caesar?s greed is so great that he deliberately hurts and takes advantage of other people to attain power

Brutus V. Antony: Compare The Speeches Made By Brutus And Antony After Caesar's Death. Julius Caesar, By William Shakespeare

797 words - 3 pages Brutus and Antony are both portrayed as above average orators in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they both use this skill to achieve there preplanned goals in there speeches. Brutus's goal was to rationalize the assassination of Caesar and to convince the people that Brutus and his fellow conspirators were actually heroes for what they did. On the other hand Antony's goal was to turn the people of Rome against the

Julius Caesar Qualities Of A Good Leader

968 words - 4 pages great leader.Along with being confident, Antony would make a great leader because of his nobility towards others. Antony was seen to be noble towards Caesar. The two men were close to each other like a mother and her child. When Caesar died, Antony wanted revenge for Caesar. And Caesar's spirit, ranging for revenge, "With Ate by his side come hot from hell / Shall stir these confines with a monarch's voice / Cry "Havoc!" and let slip the dogs of

Roberto Goizueta And Jack Welch: The Wealth Builders What Makes A Great Leader? What Common Characteristics Were Shared? Why Each An Effective Leader?

631 words - 3 pages create outstanding results. Knowledge and technical skills are basic prerequisites for their success; most importantly, Welch and Goizueta empowered with behavioral and motivational competencies as critical differentiators.Why an effective leader?After all, effective leadership is one of the most elusive keys to organizational success and forming distinctiveness. The article details these findings and offers two vivid examples effective and high