This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Comparing And Contrasting Juror 3 And Juror 8 From Twelve Angry Men

1396 words - 6 pages

In the play “Twelve Angry men”, the story line presents a variety of perspectives and opinions between twelve very different men. Some are more likely to be pointed out as prejudice, and others are more focused on reaching fair justice. Clearly, it is quite difficult for different people to vote ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ in unity when coming to a fair decision. In all of the twelve jurors, I have chosen Juror 3 and Juror 8 for contrast and comparison. I believe that Juror number 3 is a very opinionated man, with more differences than similarities comparing with Juror number 8.

These two jurors are almost the plain opposite of each other. Juror 3 appears to be a very intolerant man accustomed of forcing his wishes and views upon others. On the other hand, Juror 8 is an honest man who keeps an open mind for both evidence and reasonable doubt. Since these two people are indeed very different, they both have singular thoughts relating to the murder case. Juror 8 is a man who is loyal to justice. In the beginning of the play, he was the only one to vote ‘not guilty’ the first time the twelve men called a vote. Although his personality is reflected on being a quiet, thoughtful, gentle man, he is still a very persistent person who will fight for justice to be done. Juror 8 is a convincing man who presents his arguments well, but can also be seen as manipulative. An example would be when he kept provoking Juror 3 until he finally said “I’m going to kill you" to Juror 8. He did this because he wanted to prove that saying "I’ll kill you" doesn’t necessarily mean that Juror 3 was actually going to kill him. Juror 3 is a totally different character. He is a stubborn man who can be detected with a streak of sadism. He was forcing reasonable doubt out of his mind throughout the whole play, and only stuck with his prejudice. Juror 3 was basing his failed relationship with his son on the accused boy. The reason that he had such a bad relationship with his son is because when the boy was young, he ran away from a fight and Juror 3 said: “I’m going to make a man out of you or I’m going to bust you up into little pieces trying”. Later on, when his son was older, they got into a fight and Juror 3 hasn’t seen him since. This experience probably left him the impression that all kids take their loved ones for granted, and that they deserve severe punishments. Juror 3 is not the type to provide the sharpest evidence or information, but he is very determined to prove that the accused really did murder the victim. Juror 8 practically gives nothing away about his real life, probably because he did not want to add his own prejudices to the case. Juror 3 gave both his ill-mannered personality and bigotry away in the play.

Indeed, Juror 3 and 8 have individual outlooks on the case, but I believe that even between these two diverse people, there are is one strong similarity, and that would have to be persistency. In the...

Find Another Essay On Comparing and Contrasting Juror 3 and Juror 8 from Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men Essay

1488 words - 6 pages other like kids until they conclude a verdict. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a group of men are summoned for jury duty and almost all of the men would rather conclude a verdict immediately and leave; except for one, Juror #8. He managed to detain the group by requesting for a discussion of the murder trial before voting “guilty” or “not guilty.” Not once did Juror #8 allow the others to influence him unless they had a valid explanation. Often

A Real Twelve Angry Men and Jerry Sandusky Trial

2236 words - 9 pages and lawyer, Sandusky stood alone. However, after reading the play Twelve Angry Men, and after analyzing Juror Three, one can infer that he would possibly side with Sandusky. This is shown when Juror Three said, “‘You’re right. It’s the kids. The way they are you know? They don’t listen,’ he says bitterly, ‘I’ve got a kid. When he was eight years old he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed. I told him right out, ‘I’m gonna make a man

Twelve angry men

818 words - 3 pages Put yourself on trial, where 11 jurors out of 12 vote guilty. Although you are innocent, and the one man in the jury who votes not guilty has reasonable doubt for your guilt. Your life is in twelve angry mens' hands. You can hardly defend yourself. It's up to the jurors to interpret the words in the testimonies to find the truth. In "Twelve Angry Men," by Reginald Rose the main factor's that create reasonable doubt for the jurors to look at were

Twelve Angry Men

644 words - 3 pages . He was also trying to recreate a situation to see if indeed one of the witnesses on the stand was lying. Quotes like this one convinced me that #8 was very wise and intelligent person: "If he heard anything at all, he still couldn't have identified to voice with the el roaring by..." (The el is a train)I believe Twelve Angry Men situation could happen in the real life, and I am almost certain it has already happened, however I do not

Twelve Angry Men Plot

610 words - 2 pages Plot: “Twelve Angry Men” is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the

Twelve Angry Men

1149 words - 5 pages insight into the fundamental truths that can come out of a negotiation from watch ?Twelve Angry Men.? I now know that no matter what the evidence given, there can be some truth and some falsification to it. I feel that you should not always believe what you are told is the truth because there may be some hidden meaning to it or information that you may have overlooked, but other will pick up on. I have also learned that negotiations can be very

A Real Twelve Angry Men and The Rodney King Trial

1900 words - 8 pages two months and the jury reached the uttermost biased verdict. After reading the play Twelve Angry Men and researching the Rodney King Beating trial, it is easy to conclude Juror Three would be indecisive about the verdict of this trial. His opinion would waver back and forth because he would have opinions regarding both sides. In the play Twelve Angry Men, Juror Three said, “I’ve got a kid. When he was eight years old he ran away from a fight

Twelve Angry Men

664 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth based only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without any personal bias. In spite of this assumption people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what I’m talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who

Twelve Angry Men and the Jurors of The Kevorkian Trials

2347 words - 9 pages taking out it first” (Rose 3). If Juror Eight was willing to give a boy with no future a chance, then he would most likely have done the same with Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Juror Eight would want to know all the facts and go over them again and again, until he had no reasonable doubt that Dr. Kevorkian was guilty. All it takes is one person to step up and soon people will follow. Juror Nine, from Twelve Angry Men, noted of Eight, “This gentleman chose

Movie Analysis "Twelve Angry Men"

1745 words - 7 pages source of group conflict, we can provide many examples from the movie "Twelve Angry Men" because all jurors are so different and do not know each other very well. Juror #3, for example, is obviously the absolute opposite to juror #5. Juror #3 has no tolerance and respect; he is rude and loud-mouthed. At one time during the discussion, he shouts: "Why listen to facts, I am right! The guy is guilty. You are all listen to stories of a

Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

2027 words - 8 pages displayed throughout the movie "Twelve Angry Men". Henry Fonda emerged as a leader because of his motivation and respect earned from others. Although he was surrounded by intimidating people he was able to emerge into various leadership styles. There is a lot to learn from this movie and it shows that anyone is able to influence others through effective leadership.ReferencesLumet, S. (Director). (1957). Twelve Angry Men. United States: United Artists.Rothwell, D. J. (2007). In Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups and Team (6th edition). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

Similar Essays

Twelve Angry Men Juror Notes Essay

1100 words - 4 pages first person because it shows the point of view from the victim of prejudice and twelve angry men the third person because it shows the perspective of the people who are the racists.twelve angry men - if there is enough reasonable doubt then the defendant is not guilty BIBLIOGRAPHY

Juror 3 Essay

1001 words - 4 pages difficult to fairly judge the innocence of the defendant. In fact, in the play Twelve Angry Men, Juror Three exhibits the effect that personal prejudice can have on the judicial system, as well as the ineffective arguments produced from this prejudice. He reveals how unsuccessful bias-based arguments are, and the lack of evidence and persuasive reasoning resulting from them. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, although Juror three attempts to prove

12 Angry Men: 8th Juror Importance

10678 words - 43 pages Color-- -1- -2- -3- -4- -5- -6- -7- -8- -9- Text Size-- 10-- 11-- 12-- 13-- 14-- 15-- 16-- 17-- 18-- 19-- 20-- 21-- 22-- 23-- 24 TWILIGHT By Stephenie Meyer Contents PREFACE 1. FIRST SIGHT 2. OPEN BOOK 3. PHENOMENON 4. INVITATIONS 5. BLOOD TYPE 6. SCARY STORIES 7. NIGHTMARE 8. PORT ANGELES 9. THEORY 10. INTERROGATIONS 11. COMPLICATIONS 12. BALANCING 13. CONFESSIONS 14. MIND OVER MATTER 15. THE CULLENS 16. CARLISLE 17. THE GAME 18. THE HUNT 19

This Is An Essay About "12 Angry Men", By Reginald Rose. It Describes Juror 6 And The Cons Of The Jury System

942 words - 4 pages Juror 6:In the story "12 angry Men", by Reginald Rose, juror six is described as an honest but slow man, one who finds it difficult to create a positive opinion, and is often listening and slowly trying to understand the opinions of others, rather then forming his own. In the text of the play, we can find examples of many of these characteristics of juror six and even more that were not given to us by the author.The first, and most obvious