This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Comparing Brutus' And Mark Antony's Funeral Speeches In Julius Caeser By William Shakespeare

1235 words - 5 pages

Comparing Brutus' and Mark Antony's Funeral Speeches in Julius Caeser by William Shakespeare

Julius Caeser is a well known play written by William Shakespeare. It
is based on the life and after life of the great roman leader, Caeser.
One of the most important and memorable scenes in the play is when
Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches at Caeser's funeral. In
this essay I will be comparing to two, noting the key speech writing
elements, and finally concluding which I think is most effective.

The first speech we hear is that of Brutus. In his speech he aims to
justify his reasons for killing Caeser, and also hopefully gain the
backing of his fellow Romans.

In Antony's speech he is trying to prove that the conspirators are
wrong to have killed Caeser, but he has the harder job because he is
speaking by permission of Brutus, therefore has to discretely drop
hints that this is the case.

A speech writing element that both Brutus and Antony use is emotive
language. The difference is that Antony genuinely feels emotion for
Caeser's death, whereas Brutus is merely pretending. Brutus refers to
himself as 'a dear friend of Caeser's'. This makes Brutus seem
honourable, because he killed a good friend of his 'for the good of
Rome'. Since Antony is actually upset about Caeser's death, I find his
emotive language to be more effective. He says 'my heart is in the
coffin there with Caeser.' This demonstrates just how much of a friend
Caeser was to Antony.

In both speeches we see elements of hyperbole. This exaggeration of
language shocks the listener. Brutus says 'had you rather Caeser was
living and die all slaves?' Of course this would never be the case,
but it was effective in this speech, because the audience were naïve
enough to believe it. Antony also uses hyperbole. He said 'when the
poor hath cried, Caeser hath wept.' Again Caeser wouldn't literally
have cried, although he may have been upset. This exaggeration helps
to create the image that Caeser wasn't so bad after all.

Rhetorical questions are a very influential persuasive device, and can
be pinpointed in both speeches. Brutus uses them to see if the
listeners are proud to be Romans, 'who here is so vile that will not
love his country?' This gives the audience something to contemplate
on, and they all say 'non Brutus non.' Brutus gets his desired answer.
Antony uses rhetorical devices also. He says 'did in this Caeser seem
ambitious?' He is asking the crowd whether they think that refusing
the crowd is ambition. Both of these questions are effective because
they involve the audience in their speeches, by asking them an

In both speeches, the writers use 'threes', this is where they string
three words together, thus making them memorable. Brutus uses
'friends, countrymen and lovers' when he refers to...

Find Another Essay On Comparing Brutus' and Mark Antony's Funeral Speeches in Julius Caeser by William Shakespeare

Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus's and Antony's Speeches

1052 words - 4 pages Brutus's and Antony's Speeches in Julius Caesar   William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is a tragic story of the dog and the manger.  After Caesar is killed Mark Antony, a good friend of Caesar, plots to revenge his bloody death.  He knows there is strength in numbers, and through a speech at Caesar's funeral, Antony plans to win the crowd of Rome and turn them against Brutus and the other conspirators.  Cassius is one of

Brutus and Antony’s Use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

1367 words - 5 pages Politicians and companies are constantly competing to persuade the masses to “stand for this” or “buy that”, its become a part of our everyday lives, Persuasion is a very powerful weapon even against the most stoic of people. In the Tragedy, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Cassius, a high class politician with bad intentions persuades Brutus, an honorable, stoic high class politician and Casca to kill Caesar for the good of Rome, however

Brutus and Antony’s Use of Rhetoric in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

656 words - 3 pages William Shakespeare is most well known for his plays like the Hamlet, or Romeo and Juliet, for their effects as loving tragedies; however, Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar takes a different pace because of its historical evidence that has been developed into a tragedy. This twist has caused a fictional look into what was happening in Rome during the end of Caesar’s life and thereafter, as well as the persuasive techniques used by the Romans, like

Brutus and Greed in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

993 words - 4 pages downfall was the seed of Brutus’s plunder. Brutus and the others soaked their hands in Caesar’s blood before they went out to the crowd and announced his death. He was arrogant enough to let Mark Antony speak at Caesar’s death ceremony. “Speak in the order of his funeral.” (III.i.242) “You shall, Mark Antony.” (III.i.243) Mark Antony turned the monstrous crowd against Brutus, and the murderers forcing the entire assassination crew to leave Rome

Mark Antony´s Loyalty in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

1037 words - 5 pages What is loyalty? Loyalty means being faithful to one’s own country, ideals, and friends. Loyalty is illustrated as Mark Antony in this The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. This play, which was set in 44 B.C., was written by William Shakespeare in 1599. “I shall remember: When Caesar says “Do this,” it is performed.” (l.ii.9-10). Mark Antony also changed his party and completely devoted himself to Caesar when Rome split into two factions; the

Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar". Analyze brutus' and Antony's funeral orations from both a rhetorical and character standpoint. Points taken off for not analyzing Antony's FULL oration

720 words - 3 pages rhetorical standpoint, Brutus' prose also creates a larger gap in the eloquence of Brutus' speech and Antony's oration. Since the more educated, like Antony, use verse, which shows intelligence, Antony portrays himself as cultured and well-spoken while Brutus' use of prose shows his utter stupidity. Not only is the delivery ironic, but the actual text as well. "Here comes [Caesar's] body, mourned by Mark Antony, who, though he had no hand in his death

The Power of the Speeches in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

891 words - 4 pages In one of the most renowned plays of all time written by landmark play write William Shakespeare the two ground breaking speeches of Julius Caesar serve as a critical element to the ending. Both of these speeches given by Brutus and Mark Antony up hold perhaps the most controversial part of the play and have stayed controversial over centuries; Was Julius Caesars killing justified? The speeches though wildly different have great

Rhetorical Analysis of Mark Antony in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

965 words - 4 pages “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare is the story of the assassination of Julius Caesar. Two speeches were made after his death, one being by Mark Antony. He uses many rhetorical devices in this speech to counter the previous speech and persuade the crowd that the conspirators who killed Caesar were wrong. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion and these many devices strengthen this by making points and highlighting flaws. Antony uses many

The three main deaths and the speeches from brutus and Marc antony in julius caesar

828 words - 3 pages faces death nobly, "Hold then my sword, and turn away thy face, while I do run upon it..." (IV, i, 47-48). This shows that Brutus is the noblest of the three characters and not afraid of dying for what he believed in for his country. These three deaths show the different attitudes and circumstance of each character.In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus and Mark Antony give a speech at Caesar's funeral. Caesar was just murdered by his

Suicide in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

1095 words - 4 pages brilliant Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, many characters in the play take their own lives, this throws us into the dark as to whether or not their acts of suicide are heroic or weak. As described in Julius Caesar the play, Brutus is a man driven by will and pride. Honor is also a very vibrant underlying foundation of Brutus’ character. After the suspenseful assassination of Caesar, specifically during his funeral speech

How Brutus' Three Mistakes affected the Outcome of his life - "Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare

594 words - 2 pages Everyday people make decisions that may or may not determine the outcomes of their lives. It took only three wrong choices to bring calamity upon Marcus Brutus. First, he refused to agree to the death of Marc Antony, second, he allowed Marc Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral and third, he decided to risk all in one battle at Philippi. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus makes three big mistakes that bring him to his

Similar Essays

Marc Antony's Funeral Oration In "Julius Caeser"

2513 words - 10 pages In this speech Mark Antony argues that Julius Caesar was dishonourably murdered by Brutus and his accomplices. He argues for the crowd to see through Brutus' apparent integrity and for the crowd to hold him to account for his crime in assassinating the once much respected leader. He does this by forming an emotional relationship with the crowd and engineering a deep level of trust. He subtly sows seeds of discontent in the crowd and uses

Julius Caesar By William Shakespeare. The Importance Of Mark Antony's Soliloquy (Funeral Speech)

519 words - 2 pages In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony delivers a very strong and persuasive funeral oration in Caesar's honor. Antony himself was a trusted friend of Caesar and manipulated the conspirators of the play in thinking that he approved of their deed. With his influential tone and methods of verbal communication, Antony had his audience in an awe of disgust and hate. Mark Antony's funeral speech: A soliloquy that changed the

Comapring The Speeches Of Mark Antony And Brutus In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

2132 words - 9 pages Comapring the Speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar The play 'Julius Caesar' reaches a peak of tension at the point of the two speeches, and so it would seem whichever speech was enjoyed more by the crowd would make the speaker the more popular. This was in fact the case in the play. Mark Antony used better techniques of speech than Brutus and he prevailed in the end. After the

Brutus V. Antony: Compare The Speeches Made By Brutus And Antony After Caesar's Death. Julius Caesar, By William Shakespeare

797 words - 3 pages Brutus and Antony are both portrayed as above average orators in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they both use this skill to achieve there preplanned goals in there speeches. Brutus's goal was to rationalize the assassination of Caesar and to convince the people that Brutus and his fellow conspirators were actually heroes for what they did. On the other hand Antony's goal was to turn the people of Rome against the