This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, And Jean Jacques Rousseau

2042 words - 8 pages

Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all dealt with the issue of political freedom within a society. John Locke's “The Second Treatise of Government”, Mill's “On Liberty”, and Rousseau’s “Discourse On The Origins of Inequality” are influential and compelling literary works which while outlining the conceptual framework of each thinker’s ideal state present divergent visions of the very nature of man and his freedom. The three have somewhat different views regarding how much freedom man ought to have in political society because they have different views regarding man's basic potential for inherently good or evil behavior, as well as the ends or purpose of political societies.
In order to examine how each thinker views man and the freedom he should have in a political society, it is necessary to define freedom or liberty from each philosopher’s perspective. John Locke states his belief that all men exist in "a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and person as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man." (Ebenstein 373) Locke believes that man exists in a state of nature and thus exists in a state of uncontrollable liberty, which has only the law of nature, or reason, to restrict it. (Ebenstein 374) However, Locke does state that man does not have the license to destroy himself or any other creature in his possession unless a legitimate purpose requires it. Locke emphasizes the ability and opportunity to own and profit from property as necessary for being free.
John Stuart Mill defines liberty in relation to three spheres; each successive sphere progressively encompasses and defines more elements relating to political society. The first sphere consists of the individuals "inward domain of consciousness; demanding liberty of conscious in the most comprehensive sense; liberty of thought and feeling; absolute freedom of opinion and sentiment on all subjects, practical or speculative, scientific, moral, or theological." (Ebenstein 532) The second sphere of Mill's definition encompasses the general freedoms which allow an individual to freely peruse a " to suit our own character; of doing as we like..." (Ebenstein 533) Mill also states that these freedoms must not be interfered with by "fellow creatures, so long as what we do does not harm them..." (Ebenstein 533), The final sphere of Mill's definition of liberty is a combination of the first two. He states that "...the freedom to unite, for any purpose not involving harm to others: the persons combining being supposed to be of full age, and not forced and or deceived." (Ebenstein 535)
Rousseau thought that man was born weak and ignorant, but virtuous. It is only when man became sociable that they became wicked. (Cress, 80) Since civil society makes men corrupt, Rousseau...

Find Another Essay On Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism Essay

1586 words - 7 pages A major problem in society John Stuart Mill highlights is that there is not a set standard for judging what makes something right or wrong. Clearing these principles is one of the fundamental steps for consensus on moral thinking. Mill believes that what makes something right or wrong is based on whether it is thought of as “good”. However, this only further raises the question on what is considered good. Mill purposes the goodness as a

John Stuart Mill Essay

1827 words - 7 pages Who is John Stuart Mill? John Stuart Mill was born on May 20, 1806, in London, England. He was mostly known for his radical views. For example, he preached sexual equality, divorce, universal suffrage, free speech, and proportional representation. He had many works of writings such as Principles of Political Economy, On Liberty, The Subjections of Women, and the Three Essays of Religion: Nature, the Utility of Religion, and Theism.  &nbsp

John Stuart Mill - Life and Economics

571 words - 2 pages most elastic in its demand for goods. By this, John Stuart Mill was talking about the ratio of percent change in one country to another – the percent change being the increase or decrease in value of a good (in a percentage). The last two parts of this book were; the influence of the progress on society on production and distribution2 – that is, the way the development of a country affects its production and distribution – and, the

Ethics: Ayn Rand and John Stuart Mill

1367 words - 6 pages Ethics is defined as the study of moral standards and how they affect conduct in a society or individual. With such a definition it is not wonder that the idea of what is ethically right or wrong can be interpreted differently depending on whose moral compass you use. Though there are many scholars to choose from I chose two very specific doctrines to evaluate for the purpose of this class. Ayn Rand and John Stuart Mill are two scholarly writers

John Stuart Mill: Representation's importance and pitfalls

1238 words - 5 pages For John S. Mill, representation is the best form of government. "The ideally best form of government is that in which the sovereignty, or supreme controlling power in the last resort, is vested in the entire aggregate of the community; every citizen not only having a voice in the exercise of that ultimate sovereignty, but being, at least occasionally, called on to take an actual part in the government, by the personal discharge of some public

John Stuart Mill Biographical Information

1400 words - 6 pages John Stuart Mill was a very intelligent man, who not only was a great economist of his time, but he was also a philosopher, scholar, author and a political scientist. He was the “most influential English-speaking philosopher of the 19th century.” (John Mill, 1) John made a huge impact on the world. He contributed many ideas and beliefs to society. John Mill was a man of many talents, and he had the courage to hold beliefs that most people did

Utilitarianism, by John Stuart Mill

2492 words - 10 pages In John Stuart Mill’s work Utilitarianism, Mill is trying to provide proof for his moral theory utilitarianism and disprove all the objections against it. Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" (Ch. II, page 7). He calls this the “greatest happiness principle. Mill says, “No reason can be given

John Stuart Mill on Liberty

2027 words - 8 pages to others", and some feel they are no actions that only affect the person, not others. Indeed many feel that Mill's theory raises as many questions as it answers. It is true that "harm to others" can be interrupted differently, however Mill knew of what he was talking and I believe he clearly defines this in the essay and that I have also explained it in this essay. Overall I believe that John Stuart Mill makes a very clear, coherent and

Utilitarianism, by John Stuart Mill

1368 words - 5 pages . Bibliography Crisp, Roger: J.S. Mill Utilitarianism, Oxford University Press, New York 1999. Crisp, Roger: Routledge philosophy guidebook to Mill on utilitarianism / Roger Crisp. London : Routledge, 1997. Mill, John Stuart: Utilitarianism in Coursepack for PY1101 Web Sources

On Liberty - John Stuart Mill

1126 words - 5 pages John Stuart Mill was a great philosopher of the nineteenth century and the author of 'On Liberty.' In this writing (written in 1850), Mills voiced his ideas on individual freedom, both social and political. His intended audience is educated, healthy and 'civilized' adults. He equates our personal freedoms with the pursuit of happiness, in particular, freedom of speech and expression. Mill defines the meaning of liberty as the relationship

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1317 words - 5 pages & Company LTD., 1969. Morely, John. Rousseau. London: Macmillan & Company, 1886. Havens, George R. Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1978. July 7, 1712- death of rousseau’s mother, suzanne bernard rousseau. October 3, 1722- isaac rousseau wounds pierre gautier, a retired army captain, with a sword. October 11, 1722- isaac flees to nyon, 10 miles away, out of genevan jurisdiction. Cousin, abraham Bernard and jean

Similar Essays

John Locke Vs Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay

1693 words - 7 pages John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are great political philosophers that have many similar insights about society and its political form. However, when closely examining the writings of these thinkers, one can easily discover many subtle differences among them. The two philosophers base their theories on different assumptions, which subsequently lead to dissimilar ideas about the origin of society and the constitution of governments. As a

John Locke And Jean Jacques Rousseau On Equality And Democracy

1567 words - 6 pages Fighting for democracy in an age of monarchies in Europe, John Locke was a revolutionary thinker whose belief in human reason and self-rule inspired many intellectuals centuries after his death. Advocating the "general will," or actions and decisions for the good of the community rather than one's self, the insight of Jean-Jacques Rousseau is found in almost every hint of modern philosophy. Though in common they share theories on the state of

Jean Jacques Rousseau And John Locke: Their Relevance For American Society

2166 words - 9 pages In Second Treatise on Government and The Social Contract, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau each present and describe their own perceptions of what allows for equality, freedom and democracy. Of the many major ideas developed throughout these texts, the two main distinctions between the two philosophers are natural freedom versus civil freedom and individualism versus collectivism. John Locke, who provided the framework that would allow for

Comparing Karl Marx And John Stuart Mill

4526 words - 18 pages originally issued in several languages, including an English version. According to Mark, the modern age is a dangerous age, an age in which we might be alienated from that individual independence in work and in mind which defines our humanity. Confronted by this crisis, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill offer the world diverging solutions: annihilate the existing world and march toward communism, or guard against the dangers of the existing world