Comparing Thomas Mores Utopia And Machiavelli’s The Prince Macquarie University Politics Essay

1828 words - 8 pages

Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince are both concerned with the 
fundamental issues of how society works in hand with virtue in order to maintain itself. The goals behind the two works, however, differ considerably. The aim of Utopia is to exemplify the maintenance of a perfect society (More 1516, p. 32) and the goal of The Prince is to instruct a prince, or ruler, on how to sustain his state (Machiavelli 1532, Chapter 16). From the exterior, these two goals may seem similar but the difference lies in the way the authors handle the appropriation of virtue. The Prince treats virtue as a necessity in order to hold power, a goal, to be worked towards and maintained, almost at all costs whilst Utopia, although a work of fiction, treats virtue as something all individuals have, defining them more as being empowered by such a force (Hexter 1964, p. 960). By comparing the way both works use and treat point of view and form, political systems and ideals the differences in perspective on the understanding of virtue become progressively clear. 
Machiavelli’s view of political nature examines a view of governing markedly different to how states were governed during that time period. Machiavelli believed that The Prince should be the sole authority who determines every aspect of the state’s political landscape and enact a policy which would serve in the best interest of The Prince himself (Ball 1984, p.525). According to Ball (1984, p.525) this entire concept is one which delineates a new meaning of the understanding of virtue, with the principal concern being the establishment of a powerful political system. Machiavelli states, that in order to maintain hold on the political establishment, the ruler must abandon prior moral thinking (Ball 1984, p.526). For Machiavelli, a ruler who deliberates outside of the moral framework, is one that will succeed in maintaining power. This understanding of total control does suggest disregard for virtue, but Machiavelli argues for The Prince to not base political philosophy on Christian virtues and rather a similar concept (Machiavelli 1532, Chapter 16). Rather, Machiavelli states that the Prince must learn to be not good. By this Machiavelli does not mean that the prince must learn to be evil, but that he should, in his role as prince, unlearn the Christian virtues, replacing these virtues of another variety entirely (Parel 1990, p. 537). These clearly political or princely virtues Machiavelli defined by the single word, ‘virtu’ (Hexter 1964, p. 954).
Machiavelli’s ‘virtu’ presents as a role-playing concept and more than an inherent quality as it can be seen to be manipulated to fit specific situations or attain certain goals. The idea of ‘virtu’ are qualities which any good ruler should possess, such as deliberately keeping secrets and a flair for the violent when political ideologies are challenged (Shklar 1982, p. 86). Whilst this whole concept of ‘virtu’ is a paradox, possessing such qualities and...

Find Another Essay On Comparing Thomas Mores Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince - Macquarie University Politics - Essay

Comparing Sir Thomas More's Utopia and Virgil's Aeneid

2376 words - 10 pages Identity and Power in Sir Thomas More's Utopia and Virgil's Aeneid In Utopia and the Aeneid, Sir Thomas More and Virgil describe the construction and perpetuation of a national identity. In the former, the Utopian state operates on the “inside” by enforcing, through methods of surveillance, a normalized identity on its citizens under the guise of bettering their lives. In the latter, the depleted national identity of the future Romans in

Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Modern Executive

1990 words - 8 pages the time, on Machiavelli was limited. Machiavelli’s knowledge of specific details of politics is primarily the culmination of a life-long career as a bureaucrat and diplomat.     In The Prince, Machiavelli offers advice to rulers as to what they must do to achieve their aims and secure their power. Butterfield describes Machiavelli’s teaching as a "collection of concrete maxims-warnings and injunctions in regard to certain points of policy

Essay on client interview skills and the link to ethical practice - Macquarie University LAWS108 - Essay

1409 words - 6 pages Professional Relationships assessment: Essay on client interview skills and the link to ethical practice Fiore Houwing (44366728) LAWS108: Law, Lawyers and Society, semester 2 2017 Length: 1421 words Introduction The client interview process is one of the most common and frequently performed tasks for lawyers and possessing the relevant skills is therefore essential for competent legal practice. The first part of this essay explains how a

BBA220 Entrepreneurship - Macquarie University - Essay

3117 words - 13 pages entrepreneurship to harvest its profits rather than recognizing their true potential and deriving self-satisfaction. References Journal Articles Amit, R., Muller, E. (1995) “Push and Pull Entrepreneurship” Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 12(4), pp. 64-80. Cantillon, R. and Van den Berg, R. (2015) Richard Cantillon’s Essay on the Nature of Trade in General. London: Routlege. Drucker, P. F. (1985) “The Practice of

Machiavelli’s The Prince: Examples of Machiavellian Leaders

2344 words - 9 pages politicians tell the people what they want to hear and not the truth. Interestingly, modern politics is based off of Machiavelli’s teachings in the Prince. Therefore, most politicians practice or use some of Machiavelli’s techniques. Not only did Machiavelli’s influence spread to modern politics but it also spreaded to modern business, such as big corporations. As before, there are many examples of Machiavellian companies. AT&T, being one

Thomas more and utopia

1974 words - 8 pages In the work Utopia,which is a product of imagination,More tells us about the flawless system of governing which he establishes.In his writings More reflects the aspirations of a Renaissance man.This both caused him to be considered as the Socrates of Europe and to be executed in the face of his disobedience against the king.Ideas of Humanism and Reformation had found refuge in More's mind.While carrying such qualities in theory,he was in fact a

Comparing Orwell's "1984" and Machiavelli's "The Prince"

1932 words - 8 pages When examining the totalitarian government of 1984 by George Orwell, a direct connection can be drawn to the motives and ideals associated with Niccoló Machiavelli’s The Prince. Machiavelli’s support of the political necessity as a means to remain in power resonate with the government whose aim is to “extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought” as a way to ensure complete political orthodoxy within the country (193

How did the communist Russia influence russian culture - Macquarie University, Russian Culture - Essay

1465 words - 6 pages tight control over educational policies, and the state was under communist rule, it is clear that the political structure of Russia influenced, but more than anything heavily dictated the educational system. Ball, A. M. (1994). And Now My Soul Is Hardened: Abandoned Children in Soviet Russia 1918-1930: University of California Press. CIA. (2015). World Fact Book: Russia. from https://

Comparing More's Utopia, Machiavelli's The Discourses, and Hobbes' The Leviathan

2627 words - 11 pages logical result of fear and of human, peace seeking, nature. Works Cited Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Edwin Curley (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994. More, Thomas. Utopia. Trans. Clarence H. Miller. 2nd ed. Yale University Press. 2001 Walker, Leslie J. The Discourses of Niccolo Machiavelli Routledge, 2013

Comparing Virtue and Vice in Utopia, The Bible, and Othello

881 words - 4 pages Comparing Virtue and Vice in Utopia, The Bible, and Othello The definition of virtue varies between cultures and societies. Utopian ideas of virtue do not necessarily agree with Biblical or Elizabethan England views, however, More’s "Utopia," the Biblical accounts in Genesis of Joseph and Jacob, and Shakespeare’s "Othello" all present the concept of virtue prevailing over vice. Although at times vice may appear to triumph over virtue

Comparing More’s Utopia and Redfield’s The Celestine Prophecy

2178 words - 9 pages Comparing More’s Utopia and Redfield’s The Celestine Prophecy   Throughout history many visionaries had glimpsed a world of new human culture, yet no way to create such a world had been achieved. Communism had become a tragedy. Sir Thomas More, author of Utopia, and James Redfield, author of The Celestine Prophecy, share many of the same ideas describing a new way of life. Written in 1516, More’s Utopia speaks about visions of a

Similar Essays

Comparing Leadership In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar And Machiavelli’s The Prince

1467 words - 6 pages the “right” decisions for the community, taking the blame, and being selfless. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Machiavelli’s The Prince, there are various examples as to what is the difference between a good and a bad leader, including initiative, accountability, generosity, and the leader’s values. A leader must learn to take the initiatives for many of his projects. In Julius Caesar, Cassius tries to convince Brutus of joining the

Utopia By Thomas More And The Prince By Machiavelli

819 words - 3 pages Utopia by Thomas More and The Prince by Machiavelli Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince both concern themselves with the fundamental issues of how a society works and maintains itself. The goals behind the two works, however, differ considerably. The goal of Utopia is to illustrate the maintenance of an “ideal” society and the goal of The Prince is to instruct a prince, or ruler, on how to maintain his state. On

A Compare And Contrast Of Thomas Moores Utopia And Machiavelli?S The Prince

1468 words - 6 pages Just vs. Viable      To be just is to be fair and honorable. Kids are taught that if you are kind and just you will excel and be successful. But life’s not fair and being just doesn’t necessary mean that a society will stand the test of time and be able to grow. The two different societies introduced in More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince are very different and although More’s Utopian society would be considered

Visions Of A Perfect Society Illustrated In Machiavelli's The Prince And Thomas More's Utopia

518 words - 2 pages When people think about the ‘perfect’ society, all will have a different idea on the topic. For example, Thomas More wrote in ‘Utopia’ of a society where all of the cities were exactly the same. Whereas Niccolo Machiavelli wrote about how a society should be ruled in ‘The Prince.’ Both works paint a portrait of leadership and laws, as well as life and society. In ‘The Prince’, Machiavelli isn’t describing the aspects of a perfect society, he is