This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Comparison Of Leviathan, By Thomas Hobbes, And The Discourse On The Origin And Foundations Of Inequality Among Mankind, By Jean Jacques Rousseau.

1289 words - 5 pages

Jean Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes are two of the most "influential political theorists in the world"(Arbury). Their ideas and philosophies have spread all over the world influencing the creation of many new governments (Arbury). Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were seventeenth and eighteenth century philosophers with similar, yet contrasting, theories about human nature; both men developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. Hobbes theory is based upon the assumption that "human nature is naturally competitive and violent; while Rousseau's theory about the state of 'natural man' is one living in harmony with nature and in a better situation than that he was seeing throughout his life in Europe"(Arbury). In some cases, Hobbes has been criticized because of his "overly cynical view of human nature, whereas Rousseau has been criticized because of his naïve view of human nature" (Palaver). The concept of 'state of nature' merely means the "state of man as it would be if there were no political organization or government"(People and Idea Systems). This concept has been used by many philosophers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as a "criterion of what man's natural condition might be and how this condition has been corrupted by civilization"(Palaver). Through this paper I will compare and contrast the human nature and individualism mentioned in Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes, and the Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Mankind, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau.In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes presents the reader with an overall pessimistic view of human nature, void of human emotions and based on reason. Hobbes begins his critique of human nature by creating what he refers to as 'state of nature'. Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau agree that the state of nature is what would exist without a government present. In this state of nature, Hobbes believes that people are naturally savage and out for themselves, "for the laws of nature (justice, equity, modesty, mercy, and the golden rule) of themselves without the terror of some power to cause them to be observed, are contrary to our natural passions, which carry us to partiality, pride, revenge, and the like"(qtd. in Cruz). Hobbes states that this state of human condition " worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death, and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short"(Hobbes, 377). Through his state of nature, Hobbes wants to show what men are characteristically like- what our human nature is like without conventional government to protect us. He is attempting to show us that we need a strong central power. However, Hobbes did believe in he existence of 'laws of nature' in the state of nature, one of which being the biblical golden rule. He also had a theory of 'right of nature, which was basically "the liberty each of us has to live our own individual lives, and to preserve our lives by the most appropriate...

Find Another Essay On Comparison of Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes, and the Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Mankind, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

Explaining the Origins and Evils of Society in Second Treatise of Government by Locke and Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by Rousseau

1262 words - 6 pages Second Treatise of Government by John Locke and Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by Jean-Jacques Rousseau are books written to try and explain the origin of society. Both try to explain the evils and inequalities of society, and to a certain degree to discuss whether man in his natural state is better than man in society. These political science based theories do not appear, at first, to have anything in common with J. Hector St. John De

State of Nature and Freedom: Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes

1793 words - 8 pages State of Nature and Freedom In the Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes places limits on the freedom of individuals in the social contract, as well as individuals in the state of nature. Hobbes writes that in the state nature, “the liberty each man hath to use his own power as he will himself for the preservation of his own nature; doing anything which, in his own judgement and reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means there unto” (ch. 14, ¶1). An

Differing Views on Humans as Portrayed by William Golding in Lord of the Flies and Jean Jacques Rousseau

716 words - 3 pages In the book “Lord of the Flies” written by William Golding, Golding has a certain type of philosophy that he applies throughout the book. The main idea of Golding’s philosophy is that people were naturally cruel and that if there were no rules people would fight, rob, and kill. A little later on there was another philosopher named Jean Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau’s philosophy opposed Golding’s philosophy by believing that humans in their normal

The Life and Philosophies of Jean-Jacques Rousseau

841 words - 3 pages , Robert. The European Enlightenment. 2000. 4 May 2002.Froebel Web. 2000. 4 May 2002.Glossary of People. 2001. 3 May 2002Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, and Translation by G. D. H. Cole. Alliance for Lifelong Learning-A Dissertation on the Origin and Foundation of the Inequality of Mankind and is it Authorized by Natural Law? 1998. 3 May 2002.Scruton, Roger. From Descartes to Wittgenstein: A Short History of Modern Philosophy. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and The Essence of Human Nature

1757 words - 7 pages books by your kind, who are liars” (133) and looks to “nature, which never lies” (133). The books of history are records written by man for man. They “lie” about the true origin of man by showing facts and beliefs about the present man and how he evolved. Yet, nature shows man as he once was. By using nature as the guide, Rousseau can discover the man of the past a man different than the man of today. By setting aside all the facts, Rousseau

Social contract theorists: Hobbes vs. Rousseau This paper compares and contrasts Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and then I discuss who I think has the stronger position and why

1754 words - 7 pages Thomas Hobbes believes that all people are naturally evil, hostile, and self-seeking whereas Jean Jacques Rousseau claims that all people are naturally good people and generally happy. I plan to prove that Rousseau has the stronger position of the two contract theorists.Thomas Hobbes claims all people are hostile and naturally self-seeking. Hobbes's claims when two people have a desire for the same resource the natural result is war. The state

The Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes: The State of Nature as an Exemplum

1648 words - 7 pages In the Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes's theory of the state of nature serves as an exemplum; an account that legitimizes and argues for the authority of the state, by providing the logic behind sovereignty. The theory illustrates the point that without government, man is in hell (an awful and evil state of nature), where peace, order and liberty are impossible. His purpose in writing the Leviathan, and in describing man's state of nature, should be

Biography of Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2216 words - 9 pages behaviour. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a brilliant political thinker who has had great emphasis on modern day politics. He was above all a man of the people and he attempted to find for mankind a solution to the mess he claimed civil society was in. He outlined the problem that men in civil society had in his confessions and the discourse on the origins of inequality and in his work the social contract he attempted to find

Edmund Burke and Jean Jacques Rousseau Concerning the Justification of the French Revolution

651 words - 3 pages Edmund Burke, who is often regarded as a spokesman for modern conservatism, believed that human rights were based on tradition and could only be inherited. Burke strongly opposed the French Revolution, which in his view, attempted to break from the traditions of France and destroy their contemporary society. On the other hand, Jean-Jacque Rousseau believed that general will would always be correct and that it would unshackle humans from their

Inferring Freedom and Equality. Speaks of Jean Jacques Rousseau

992 words - 4 pages Many of Earth's organisms and processes depend on each other to survive the natural world. Jean Jacques Rousseau employed this aspect of natural dependency to connect the ideas of freedom and equality together. Rousseau theorized many ingenious ideas for an upcoming legitimate government. The American Constitution and the basis of this nation's bureaucracy adopted many of his opinions, along with John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, into the making of

Questionaire: Jean- Jacques Rousseau and The Social Contract

1266 words - 5 pages some rights in order to do so. Rousseau makes a convincing solution to the problem of being able to be free while united with everyone else through his philosophy on how the social contract works. Jean- Jacques Rousseau provides a convincing solution to the problem he poses by the social contract through explaining it in steps. The first step he explains is the social contract itself. Rousseau states that by giving up some of your rights you

Similar Essays

Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau

1269 words - 5 pages entered into civilization. Works Cited: Hobbes, Thomas, and Crawford B. Macpherson. Leviathan. Harmondsworth, Middlesex [u.a.: Penguin, 1985. Print. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Donald A. Cress. Basic Political Writings: "Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts", "Discourse on the Origin of Inequality", "Discourse on Political Economy", "On the Social Contract", “The State of War”. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987. Print.

Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau

1147 words - 5 pages While Hobbes and Rousseau address many of the same issues and topics in both The Leviathan as well as The Discourses, the way that Hobbes and Rousseau look at these issues such as, human nature, the state, and inequality are extremely different from each other. In some cases Hobbes and Rousseau’s opinions on these certain ideas are completely contradicting and opposite of each other. While it is tough to say which viewpoint, Hobbes’ or

Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay

2132 words - 9 pages Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes and Rousseau, both became two of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies spread all over the world influencing the creation of

Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay

2212 words - 9 pages . Overall, I think it is clear that Rousseau’s plan is more plausible as we see more elements of his ideas in modern political arrangements than Hobbes’ ideas. I feel that for a society to thrive, it must let the individual flourish thus causing other areas (such as arts) to flourish, something Hobbes’ contract simply doesn’t allow a lot of place for. Works Cited [1] Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Company, 1987. Print. [2] Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Company, 1994. Print.