Comparison Shakespears Plays: King Lear Vs. Hamlet

1107 words - 4 pages

William Shakespeare is probably the greatest dramatist of England. I think everyone has read one of his great plays or at least has seen one of the movies which are based on Shakespeare's work. In this essay I will compare two of his tragedies 'Hamlet, Prince of Denmark' and 'Tragedy of King Lear'.King Lear is perhaps Shakespeare's most psychologically dark tragedy. The naive and pitiable Lear with his children, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia present all that is right and wrong with a father's relationship with his children. Lear is used to enjoying absolute power and to being flattered and he does not respond well being disagreed with and challenged. He wants to be treated as a king and to enjoy the title but he doesn't want to fulfill king's obligations of governing for the good of his subjects. At the beginning of the play his values are notably hollow; he prioritizes the appearance of love over actual devotion. Nevertheless, he inspires loyalty in subjects such as Gloucester, Kent, Cordelia, and Edgar, all of whom risk their lives for him. The tragedy illustrates the complete chaos which reigns in a state not governed by a strong ruler. Shakespeare constructed King Lear on an old folk story which exists in many countries and versions for example our version 'Gold over salt' which has same plot but ending of a fairy tale.Hamlet is one of Shakespeare's most popular works. This is the tragedy of suffering and hesitation of an honest man who is not able to kill or punish without having a clear proof of guilt.Both of these books are tragedies, in both books there is quarrel going on within the royal family and in both the quarrel is between the children and their parents or relatives. Hamlet is looking for the revenge on his uncle for killing Hamlet's father and he has to plan his murder. He is also upset with his mother who married the murderer of king Hamlet; he is very disappointed by her behavior.In King Lear there are two quarrels between him and his daughters. The first one is between Cordelia and the King. When he asks his three daughters how much they love him two older daughters say that they love him above all, though it was not true but the youngest daughter, Cordelia, who is at the age in which a woman is about to marry, says she would give half of her love to her father and half to her future husband. He punishes her by giving her no property and banishes her out of his kingdom. The second quarrel is between two older daughters both of them want the kingdom and also get rid of Lear. After he gave them everything Goneril and Regan banished him. He is left in a cruel storm and he loses his wit: "Is a man no more than this? Consider him well. Thou ouwest the worm no silk, the beast no hide, the sheep no wool, the cat no perfume." [Act III, scene II]The quarrels in both tragedies seem at one and same time. Fighting between members of the families is always sad but it is different in the sense that Hamlet has to kill his uncle and Lear has to...

Find Another Essay On Comparison Shakespears plays: King Lear vs. Hamlet

The Role of Femininity in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Othello, and King Lear

2331 words - 9 pages The Role of Femininity in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Othello, and King Lear Hamlet, Othello, and King Lear similarly experience an "unhooking" (Tompkins) in the eponymous plays. These tragic figures struggle with internal and external femininity: after realizing their emotions and labeling them feminine, they identify women as the source of this negative femininity. Their inability to deal with the female gender in any form destabilizes their

A Comparison Between the Plots of King Lear and Much Ado about Nothing

1194 words - 5 pages from his position of power, offering each of his daughters a share of his land in exchange for proclaiming their love for him. Cordelia refuses to do so, and is banished. In the alternative plot in King Lear, Edmund is turning his father on his legitimate brother, Edgar. In Much Ado about Nothing, the rising action begins as soon as Claudio lays eyes on Hero. From here he begins to court her, hoping to marry her. Now in comparison, these plays

A comparison of the plot development of King Lear and Much Ado About Nothing

1179 words - 5 pages development. Shakespeare uses a lot of dramatic irony in his plays, and this always helps the reader get set up for what is coming after that. The play King Lear and the play Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare each have their own use of plot development, but they also share some qualities as well. The play King Lear by William Shakespeare was written with a very well thought out plot development that makes it a very intriguing story. “The

Analyzing Shakespeare´s Account of Human Nature in King Lear in Comparison With Other Authors

1697 words - 7 pages portray that human nature is either entirely good or entirely evil. He seems to suggest, however, that it is not impossible for one to move from one end of the spectrum of human nature to the other, as multiple characters go through somewhat of a metamorphosis where their nature is changed. In this paper I analyze and present Shakespeare’s account of human nature in King Lear in comparison with other authors that we have read throughout our year

A Comparison of Pride in King Lear and The Duchess of Malfi

1568 words - 6 pages The Sin of Pride Exposed in King Lear, and The Duchess of Malfi   In this brief monograph, we shall be hunting down and examining various creatures from the bestiary of Medieval/Renaissance thought. Among these are the fierce lion of imperious, egotistical power, a pair of fantastic peacocks, one of vanity, one of preening social status, and the docile lamb of humility. The lion and the peacocks are of the species known as pride, while

In the plays Macbeth and King Lear, Shakespeare shows his characters as cruel and lacking the common feelings of humanity, through their characteristics of betrayal, selfishness, and greed.

1336 words - 5 pages learned about people in our society with the same evil characteristics that Shakespeare so vividly describes in his novels, through their actions and thoughts. In the plays Macbeth and King Lear, Shakespeare shows his characters as cruel and lacking the common feelings of humanity, through their characteristics of betrayal, selfishness, and greed. Betrayal is used many times by Shakespeare to portray evil characters in his works. Two very

A Comparison of the Outcomes of Othello and King Lear

558 words - 2 pages The Tragic Outcome of Othello and King Lear   Two Sources        In Othello and Lear, Shakespeare contrasts two endings that tragedy can bring.  As Lear is thrown from kingship, he begins to see through his previous misconceptions about love, justice, and the nature of authority.  Othello, on the other hand, held no real misconceptions about the world.  He begins the tragedy nearly

A Comparison of "Old Goriot" and "King Lear"

2020 words - 8 pages "How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child." (Act 1 scene 4 lines 282-3) This quotation may have been taken from "King Lear" but it is also very apt for Balzac's novel "Old Goriot." Both stories tell of misplaced loyalties, thankless children and self-knowledge, which comes too late. Both eponymous characters surrender their fortunes to their daughters, excepting Cordelia in "King Lear", only to find

King Lear - Edgar plays many roles throughout the play and performs a wide range of functions. What is the purpose of his role playing?

677 words - 3 pages After reading King Lear and studying the role of Edgar at some length, it is hard not to be disappointed with the outcome of Edgar's role. He performs so many roles and functions that he seems to just be a 'plot device'. Not much time was spent by Shakespeare on establishing Edgar's qualities and virtues prior to starting him off on his journey of role playing.Through this role playing it is possible to detect progression in Edgar's character as

King Lear vs. The Stone Angel

1839 words - 7 pages      It has been said that, “Rivers and mountains may change; human nature, never.”(worldofquotes.com) This is a quote that can be deconstructed when examining William Shakespeare’s King Lear and Margaret Laurence’s The Stone Angel. When reviewing the two books the main characters, King Lear and Hagar, are easily comparable. The first similarity becomes apparent when King Lear and Hagar are both developed as flawed

"The Stone Angel" vs "King Lear": Blindness,Insight

1458 words - 6 pages Blindness; a flaw with insight`It was once said, "What you lose in blindness is the space around you, the place where you are, and without that you might not exist. You could be nowhere at all."(Kingslover) This is a quote that can relate the characters in The Stone Angel and King Lear. In the tragedy King Lear, written by William Shakespeare and in the novel The Stone Angel, written by Margaret Laurence, the term blindness has an entirely

Similar Essays

Othello & King Lear A Comparison

1210 words - 5 pages SHAKESPEARE; Othello & King Lear - A comparisonIf Shakespeare was alive today it is certain that therewould be a lot written about him. We would read reviews ofhis new plays in newspapers, articles about his poetry inthe literary papers, and gossip about his love life and histaste in clothes splashed across the glossy magazines. Hisviews about everything under the sun, from the government tokitchen furniture, would probably appear regularly

Hamlet In Comparison With The Lion King

1333 words - 5 pages Many literary works can be compared due to vast amounts of similarities between theme and characters; Hamlet and the Lion King Many literary works can be compared due to vast amounts of similarities between theme and characters; Hamlet and the Lion King are two literary works in which character and theme are surprisingly similar throughout each work. The Lion King is thought to be just an animated children's film, however, it is in

Oedipus The King Comparison To Hamlet

1913 words - 8 pages /reclaiming Hope: Literature, Theology, and Sociology in Conversation. London: Ashgate, 2004. Hamilton, David. Destiny Vs Free Will: Why Things Happen the Way They Do. New York: Hay House Publishers, 2007. Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus. New York: W. W. Norton, Incorporated, 1976. Shakespeare, William "Hamlet" 2014.Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. By X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 915-939. Print. Sophocles. "Oedipus the King." 2014. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. By X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 860-870. Print.

The Role Of The Double Plot In King Lear And Hamlet

1632 words - 7 pages King Lear and Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, are two plays that reveal similar thematic elements, yet possess fundamentally different plot structures. Driven by the suffering and rage of two complementary characters, both plays suggest injustice through ‘good’, but ultimately flawed characters. This shared overarching theme is, however, conveyed differently within each of the works, as one employs two mainly disparate plot threads, while the